Statistics / Football / USA. USL League One / Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Forward Madison

Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Forward Madison Statistics & Analysis

Sep 16, 2026 - 23:00
1 1.38
0 1.22
xG Accuracy: 64%
Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (1 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS No No ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 Chattanooga Red Wolves Chattanooga Red Wolves ✔ Correct
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 1-0 ✔ Correct

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Sep 10, 2026 · 21:02 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-7956249

Closing Odds 3.71
AI Fair Odds —
CLV +0.0%
Final Result Chattanooga Red Wolves win · Chattanooga Red Wolves 1–0 Forward Madison
Prediction ✔ Correct
Decision Grade A

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE1 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Draw (1X2), Under 2.5 goals meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Under 2.5 goals by about 8.1 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market Model % Closing impl. % Gap (pp)
Chattanooga Red Wolves (1X2) 39.0 39.3 -0.4
Draw (1X2) 29.5 24.7 +4.8
Forward Madison (1X2) 31.5 36.0 -4.5
Over 2.5 goals 48.2 56.3 -8.1
Under 2.5 goals 51.8 43.7 +8.1
What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 51.8% on Under 2.5 goals, while the closing snapshot implied about 43.7%. The difference — about 8.1 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE1 · Book: Pinnacle

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table
Market Early (PRE30) Closing (PRE1) Implied Δ (pp)
Chattanooga Red Wolves (1X2) 2.33 2.33 0.0
Draw (1X2) 3.71 3.71 0.0
Forward Madison (1X2) 2.55 2.55 0.0
Over 2.5 goals 1.67 1.67 0.0
Under 2.5 goals 2.15 2.15 0.0

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Pre-match snapshot for this fixture.

  • League: USL League One
  • Fixture: Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Forward Madison
  • Kickoff: 2026-09-16 23:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 39.0% · Draw 29.5% · Away 31.5%
  • xG (showing): Chattanooga Red Wolves 1.38 — Forward Madison 1.22 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Primary / headline line (Betting Primary Pick when shown): Under 2.5 goals
  • Model: 51.8% · Implied: 44.5% · Probability edge: +7.4 pts · Est. EV: +11.4%
  • BTTS (model): Yes 54.4% · No 45.6%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.5%)

Totals and BTTS are evaluated against current market prices where available.

Early match state can move realised goals away from pre-kick projections.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Primary Bet

Outcome: Validated — Pre-match lean validated against the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 28, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Chattanooga Red Wolves & Forward Madison!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
USL League One USL League One — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Union Omaha 28 18 4 6 58
2 Charlotte Independence 28 17 6 5 57
3 Forward Madison 28 15 6 7 51
4 One Knoxville 27 13 8 6 47
5 Boise 27 13 7 7 46
6 Chattanooga Red Wolves 26 13 4 9 43
7 Spokane Velocity 25 13 4 8 43
8 Fort Wayne 27 10 8 9 38
9 Sarasota Paradise 27 9 6 12 33
10 Corpus Christi 26 8 9 9 33
11 Alta 28 8 8 12 32
12 Portland Hearts of Pine 28 7 9 12 30
13 Westchester SC 27 8 5 14 29
14 Naples 26 8 4 14 28
15 Greenville Triumph 26 6 5 15 23
16 NY Cosmos 26 6 4 16 22
17 Richmond Kickers 26 5 5 16 20
18 Tormenta 0 0 0 0 0
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Charlotte Independence 28 64 40 +24 57
2 Forward Madison 28 50 27 +23 51
3 Union Omaha 28 50 30 +20 58
4 Chattanooga Red Wolves 26 47 38 +9 43
5 Westchester SC 27 46 45 +1 29
6 One Knoxville 27 44 31 +13 47
7 Boise 27 43 37 +6 46
8 Fort Wayne 27 42 36 +6 38
9 Portland Hearts of Pine 28 40 50 -10 30
10 Spokane Velocity 25 37 33 +4 43
11 Sarasota Paradise 27 37 40 -3 33
12 Alta 28 34 40 -6 32
13 NY Cosmos 26 32 52 -20 22
14 Corpus Christi 26 30 36 -6 33
15 Naples 26 29 43 -14 28
16 Greenville Triumph 26 29 48 -19 23
17 Richmond Kickers 26 25 53 -28 20
18 Tormenta 0 0 0 0 0