Independ. Rivadavia vs Aldosivi Statistics & Analysis

Independ. Rivadavia

Sep 12, 2026 - 17:45

4 1.70

3 0.82

xG Accuracy: 29%

Aldosivi

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

Market Prediction Result Outcome
Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Over 2.5 (7 goals) ✔ Correct
Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
1X2 Independ. Rivadavia Independ. Rivadavia ✔ Correct
Correct Score Insights 1-0, 2-0, 1-1, 2-1, 0-0 4-3 ✖ Incorrect

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Sep 07, 2026 · 02:48 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-7466629

Closing Odds 1.46

AI Fair Odds —

CLV +0.0%

Final Result Independ. Rivadavia win · Independ. Rivadavia 4–3 Aldosivi

Prediction ✔ Correct

Decision Grade A

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE1 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Draw (1X2), Aldosivi (1X2) meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Draw (1X2) by about 4.7 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market	Model %	Closing impl. %	Gap (pp)
Independ. Rivadavia (1X2)	56.8	66.1	-9.2
Draw (1X2)	26.7	22.0	+4.7
Aldosivi (1X2)	16.4	11.9	+4.5
Over 2.5 goals	46.1	45.9	+0.2
Under 2.5 goals	53.9	54.1	-0.2

What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 26.7% on Draw (1X2), while the closing snapshot implied about 22.0%. The difference — about 4.7 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE1 · Book: Pinnacle

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table

Market	Early (PRE30)	Closing (PRE1)
Independ. Rivadavia (1X2)	1.46	1.46
Draw (1X2)	4.38	4.38
Aldosivi (1X2)	8.11	8.11
Over 2.5 goals	2.11	2.11
Under 2.5 goals	1.79	1.79

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Quick read on how the model reads this matchup.

League: Liga Profesional Argentina
Fixture: Independ. Rivadavia vs Aldosivi
Kickoff: 2026-09-12 17:45:00
1X2 (model): Home 56.8% · Draw 26.7% · Away 16.4%
xG (showing): Independ. Rivadavia 1.7 — Aldosivi 0.82 (total xG ≈ 2.52)
Primary / headline line (Betting Primary Pick when shown): BTTS Yes
Model: 47.2% · Implied: 42.2% · Probability edge: +4.9 pts · Est. EV: +6.2%
BTTS (model): Yes N/A · No N/A
Correct score (top bin): N/A

Use the cards for tiering; this text only restates the same inputs in narrative form.

Early match state can move realised goals away from pre-kick projections.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Primary Bet

Outcome: Validated — Pre-match lean validated against the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 16, 2026 (UTC)

Explore More Predictions Content

Get Premium Predictions for Independ. Rivadavia & Aldosivi!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now

Back to Statistics

Liga Profesional Argentina — Standings

#	TEAM	MP	W	D	L	PTS
1	Estudiantes L.P.	16	9	4	3	31
2	Boca Juniors	16	8	6	2	30
3	Velez Sarsfield	16	7	7	2	28
4	Talleres Cordoba	16	7	5	4	26
5	Independiente	16	6	6	4	24
6	Lanus	16	6	6	4	24
7	San Lorenzo	16	5	7	4	22
8	Union Santa Fe	16	5	6	5	21
9	Instituto Cordoba	16	6	3	7	21
10	Defensa Y Justicia	16	4	7	5	19
11	Gimnasia M.	16	5	4	7	19
12	Platense	16	3	7	6	16
13	Central Cordoba de Santiago	16	4	4	8	16
14	Newells Old Boys	16	3	6	7	15
15	Deportivo Riestra	16	1	8	7	11

#	TEAM	MP	GS	GC	+/-	PTS
1	Independiente	16	24	20	+4	24
2	Union Santa Fe	16	24	20	+4	21
3	Boca Juniors	16	22	9	+13	30
4	Estudiantes L.P.	16	19	7	+12	31
5	Velez Sarsfield	16	18	12	+6	28
6	Lanus	16	18	15	+3	24
7	Defensa Y Justicia	16	18	21	-3	19
8	Talleres Cordoba	16	17	13	+4	26
9	Instituto Cordoba	16	17	17	0	21
10	Newells Old Boys	16	15	27	-12	15
11	San Lorenzo	16	14	14	0	22
12	Gimnasia M.	16	14	22	-8	19
13	Central Cordoba de Santiago	16	11	21	-10	16
14	Platense	16	10	15	-5	16
15	Deportivo Riestra	16	5	12	-7	11

#	TEAM	MP	xG	xGC	+/-	PTS
1	Instituto Cordoba	16	13.1	4.6	+8.5	21
2	Lanus	16	11.6	8.1	+3.5	24
3	Defensa Y Justicia	16	9.9	6.9	+3.0	19
4	Deportivo Riestra	16	9.3	6.4	+2.9	11
5	Estudiantes L.P.	16	10.6	8.6	+2.0	31
6	Union Santa Fe	16	7.8	5.9	+1.9	21
7	Boca Juniors	16	7.1	5.8	+1.3	30
8	Independiente	16	7.8	7.8	0.0	24
9	Gimnasia M.	16	7.9	8.2	-0.3	19
10	Talleres Cordoba	16	10.0	11.9	-1.9	26
11	San Lorenzo	16	4.6	6.5	-1.9	22
12	Platense	16	6.1	9.2	-3.1	16
13	Central Cordoba de Santiago	16	7.8	11.1	-3.3	16
14	Newells Old Boys	16	4.2	8.1	-3.9	15
15	Velez Sarsfield	16	6.1	10.1	-4.0	28