Torre del Mar vs Torreperogil Statistics & Analysis

May 10, 2026 - 10:00
1 1.45
2 1.25
xG Accuracy: 72%
Premium betting site 1xbet: New users can use the promo code 1x_3342271 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the model’s highlighted side (or lean) to what happened at full time.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (3 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS No Yes ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 Torre del Mar Torreperogil ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-0 1-2 ✖ Incorrect

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

  • League: Tercera División RFEF - Group 9
  • Fixture: Torre del Mar vs Torreperogil
  • Kickoff: 2026-05-10 15:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 45.0% · Draw 45.0% · Away 10.0%
  • xG (showing): Torre del Mar 1.45 — Torreperogil 1.25 (total xG ≈ 2.7)
  • Value headline: None — no positive EV could be estimated on tracked lines at current best prices (missing odds or thin book depth).
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 70.4% · Over 2.5 29.6%); BTTS No (Yes 33.1% · No 66.9%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS No
  • BTTS (model): Yes 33.1% · No 66.9%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-0 (17.9%)

The decision block shows no default bet: no tracked line clears the headline minimum +EV threshold at the best prices we have (a leg can still show small +EV below that bar). Lean labels are directional only — not bankroll-sized recommendations.

Most likely correct score stays a low-probability tail: use it for context, not as a must-bet story.

Best Bet + Reason

Skip unless odds move — the engine sees no line clearing the +EV gate.

The cards may still show value leans (e.g. a preferred Under or a BTTS side) where prices are inefficient or incomplete — that is not the same as a positive-EV ticket at the configured threshold.

Re-check after material price moves; edges appear and disappear with liquidity.

FAQ

Is the most likely correct score still relevant?

As context only: it is still a low absolute probability tail outcome (often in the single digits, sometimes low teens). It does not override the “no headline +EV” stance — treat score bets as fun-sized if you play them at all.

What do the grey “lean” labels mean then?

They summarise where the model tilts (e.g. Under 2.5 or BTTS No) without claiming a positive economic edge. Use them as context; size to zero unless you deliberately accept discretionary risk.

Should I still read the 1X2 card?

Yes — it shows whether any winner price clears value. Here it often explains why there is no headline: probabilities can be clustered while prices already embed that uncertainty.

Why is there no “best bet” on this page?

The headline engine uses a minimum +EV threshold (e.g. 2%) for a default pick. A line can still show tiny +EV that fails that bar — we still call it no default bet so readers do not over-size thin edges.

Risk Factors

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Methodology

  • Inputs: Same structured facts bundle as the public prediction page (xG / Poisson snapshot, market EV where available, decision engine v2).
  • Compliance: Educational framing only; not personalised advice.

Last Updated

May 17, 2026 (UTC)

How to use this
  • Focus on the Primary line when you want one actionable idea.
  • Do not parlay many thin-edge picks together; edges do not add reliably.
  • Treat longshots as optional, high-stake-sizing plays only.

Get Premium Predictions for Torre del Mar & Torreperogil!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
Tercera División RFEF - Group 9 Tercera División RFEF - Group 9Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Mijas Las Lagunas 34 19 9 6 66
2 Motril 34 18 11 5 65
3 Torre del Mar 34 14 13 7 55
4 Arenas Armilla 34 15 9 10 54
5 Churriana Vega 34 14 10 10 52
6 Marbelli 34 14 9 11 51
7 Ciudad de Torredonjimeno 34 13 11 10 50
8 UD San Pedro 34 13 10 11 49
9 Atlético Porcuna 34 14 4 16 46
10 Huétor Vega 34 12 9 13 45
11 Granada II 34 10 14 10 44
12 Alhaurino 34 11 10 13 43
13 UD Melilla II 34 9 12 13 39
14 Mancha Real 34 9 10 15 37
15 Huétor Tájar 34 9 10 15 37
16 Martos 34 9 10 15 37
17 Torreperogil 34 9 6 19 33
18 El Palo 34 6 9 19 27
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Motril 34 55 29 +26 65
2 Granada II 34 49 47 +2 44
3 Mijas Las Lagunas 34 46 24 +22 66
4 Huétor Vega 34 43 42 +1 45
5 Atlético Porcuna 34 41 39 +2 46
6 Alhaurino 34 41 41 0 43
7 Huétor Tájar 34 40 44 -4 37
8 UD San Pedro 34 39 37 +2 49
9 Ciudad de Torredonjimeno 34 39 38 +1 50
10 Arenas Armilla 34 38 29 +9 54
11 Torre del Mar 34 37 26 +11 55
12 Marbelli 34 36 28 +8 51
13 Churriana Vega 34 32 40 -8 52
14 Martos 34 32 48 -16 37
15 UD Melilla II 34 30 32 -2 39
16 Mancha Real 34 30 38 -8 37
17 El Palo 34 28 53 -25 27
18 Torreperogil 34 24 45 -21 33