Statistics / Football / Spain. Tercera División RFEF - Group 2 / Tuilla vs Caudal

Tuilla vs Caudal Statistics & Analysis

Tuilla Tuilla
May 10, 2026 - 15:00
1 1.45
3 1.25
xG Accuracy: 55%
Caudal Caudal
Premium betting site 1xbet: New users can use the promo code 1x_3342271 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the model’s highlighted side (or lean) to what happened at full time.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Over 2.5 (4 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 Tuilla Caudal ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1 1-3 ✖ Incorrect

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Pre-match snapshot for this fixture.

  • League: Tercera División RFEF - Group 2
  • Fixture: Tuilla vs Caudal
  • Kickoff: 2026-05-10 15:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 10.0% · Draw 45.0% · Away 45.0%
  • xG (showing): Tuilla 1.45 — Caudal 1.25 (total xG ≈ 2.7)
  • Value headline: None — no positive EV could be estimated on tracked lines at current best prices (missing odds or thin book depth).
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Over 2.5 (Under 2.5 48.1% · Over 2.5 51.9%); BTTS Yes (Yes 50.1% · No 49.9%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Over 2.5; BTTS Yes
  • BTTS (model): Yes 50.1% · No 49.9%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (11.4%)

When book depth is thin or odds are missing, EV may be unavailable even though the model still prefers one side on totals or BTTS — wait for cleaner prices or skip.

Most likely correct score stays a low-probability tail: use it for context, not as a must-bet story.

Best Bet + Reason

Skip unless odds move — the engine sees no line clearing the +EV gate.

Treat this page as a read-only diagnostic: totals/BTTS structure can be informative even when the honest answer is to wait.

Correct-score markets remain high-variance even when one scoreline leads the table.

FAQ

Is the most likely correct score still relevant?

As context only: it is still a low absolute probability tail outcome (often in the single digits, sometimes low teens). It does not override the “no headline +EV” stance — treat score bets as fun-sized if you play them at all.

Should I still read the 1X2 card?

Yes — it shows whether any winner price clears value. Here it often explains why there is no headline: probabilities can be clustered while prices already embed that uncertainty.

What do the grey “lean” labels mean then?

They summarise where the model tilts (e.g. Under 2.5 or BTTS No) without claiming a positive economic edge. Use them as context; size to zero unless you deliberately accept discretionary risk.

Why is there no “best bet” on this page?

The headline engine uses a minimum +EV threshold (e.g. 2%) for a default pick. A line can still show tiny +EV that fails that bar — we still call it no default bet so readers do not over-size thin edges.

Risk Factors

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Methodology

  • Inputs: Same structured facts bundle as the public prediction page (xG / Poisson snapshot, market EV where available, decision engine v2).
  • Compliance: Educational framing only; not personalised advice.

Last Updated

May 17, 2026 (UTC)

How to use this
  • Focus on the Primary line when you want one actionable idea.
  • Do not parlay many thin-edge picks together; edges do not add reliably.
  • Treat longshots as optional, high-stake-sizing plays only.

Get Premium Predictions for Tuilla & Caudal!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
Tercera División RFEF - Group 2 Tercera División RFEF - Group 2 — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Llanera 34 29 4 1 91
2 Covadonga 34 25 5 4 80
3 Sporting Gijón II 34 19 10 5 67
4 Caudal 34 20 6 8 66
5 Mosconia 34 16 7 11 55
6 San Martín 34 14 9 11 51
7 L'Entregu 34 13 10 11 49
8 Ceares 34 12 10 13 45
9 Praviano 34 11 9 14 42
10 Siero 34 11 9 15 42
11 Colunga 34 10 9 15 39
12 Llanes 34 8 13 13 37
13 Avilés Stadium 34 6 15 13 33
14 Gijón Industrial 34 7 11 16 32
15 Lenense 34 7 11 16 32
16 Navarro 34 6 13 15 31
17 Tuilla 34 7 6 21 27
18 Real Titánico 34 3 9 22 18
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Covadonga 34 88 24 +64 80
2 Sporting Gijón II 34 79 29 +50 67
3 Llanera 34 71 18 +53 91
4 Caudal 34 59 39 +20 66
5 Mosconia 34 46 29 +17 55
6 Llanes 34 44 51 -7 37
7 L'Entregu 34 41 42 -1 49
8 Ceares 34 39 40 -1 45
9 Siero 34 39 49 -10 42
10 Navarro 34 38 53 -15 31
11 Colunga 34 38 59 -21 39
12 San Martín 34 36 36 0 51
13 Praviano 34 36 42 -6 42
14 Gijón Industrial 34 36 57 -21 32
15 Lenense 34 36 58 -22 32
16 Tuilla 34 31 60 -29 27
17 Real Titánico 34 22 74 -52 18
18 Avilés Stadium 34 21 40 -19 33
Popular Leagues