Fort Lauderdale United W vs Carolina Ascent W Statistics & Analysis

Fort Lauderdale United W

May 09, 2026 - 23:30

0 1.45

3 1.25

xG Accuracy: 42%

Carolina Ascent W

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

Market Prediction Result Outcome
Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Over 2.5 (3 goals) ✔ Correct
Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
1X2 Fort Lauderdale United W Carolina Ascent W ✖ Incorrect
Correct Score Insights 1-1, 0-1, 1-2, 0-2, 1-0 0-3 ✖ Incorrect

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Jul 24, 2026 · 15:30 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-1612395

Closing Odds 1.57

AI Fair Odds 2.39

CLV +0.0%

Final Result Carolina Ascent W win · Fort Lauderdale United W 0–3 Carolina Ascent W

Prediction ✖ Missed

Decision Grade F

Probability Calibration

Expected: 41.8%
Historical Bucket: 40–45% — Actual 0.0% (n=2)

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE1 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Fort Lauderdale United W (1X2) meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Fort Lauderdale United W (1X2) by about 23.8 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market	Model %	Closing impl. %	Gap (pp)
Fort Lauderdale United W (1X2)	41.8	18.0	+23.8
Draw (1X2)	25.7	24.7	+1.0
Carolina Ascent W (1X2)	32.6	57.3	-24.7
Over 2.5 goals	50.6	50.0	+0.6
Under 2.5 goals	49.4	50.0	-0.6

What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 41.8% on Fort Lauderdale United W (1X2), while the closing snapshot implied about 18.0%. The difference — about 23.8 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE1 · Book: Pinnacle

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table

Market	Early (PRE30)	Closing (PRE1)
Fort Lauderdale United W (1X2)	5.0	5.0
Draw (1X2)	3.64	3.64
Carolina Ascent W (1X2)	1.57	1.57
Over 2.5 goals	1.87	1.87
Under 2.5 goals	1.87	1.87

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Pre-match snapshot for this fixture.

League: USL Super League
Fixture: Fort Lauderdale United W vs Carolina Ascent W
Kickoff: 2026-05-09 23:30:00
1X2 (model): Home 41.8% · Draw 25.7% · Away 32.6%
xG (showing): Fort Lauderdale United W 1.45 — Carolina Ascent W 1.25 (total xG ≈ 2.7)
Best +EV line (same label as hero card when Primary thresholds are not met): BTTS Yes
Model: 56.2% · Implied: 49.1% · Probability edge: +7.1 pts · Est. EV: +7.3%
BTTS (model): Yes 56.2% · No 43.8%
Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (11.4%)

Use the cards for tiering; this text only restates the same inputs in narrative form.

1X2 can look balanced even when side markets show clearer structure.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Wait - No Primary Bet

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

October 01, 2026 (UTC)

Explore More Predictions Content

Get Premium Predictions for Fort Lauderdale United W & Carolina Ascent W!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now

Back to Statistics

USL Super League — Standings

#	TEAM	MP	W	D	L	PTS
1	Lexington W	28	14	11	3	53
2	Sporting JAX	28	16	5	7	53
3	Carolina Ascent W	28	15	6	7	51
4	Dallas Trinity W	28	11	7	10	40
5	Spokane Zephyr W	28	10	9	9	39
6	DC Power W	28	8	9	11	33
7	Brooklyn W	28	6	8	14	26
8	Tampa Bay Sun W	28	5	9	14	24
9	Fort Lauderdale United W	28	5	8	15	23

#	TEAM	MP	GS	GC	+/-	PTS
1	Sporting JAX	28	54	32	+22	53
2	Lexington W	28	50	24	+26	53
3	Carolina Ascent W	28	39	27	+12	51
4	Dallas Trinity W	28	36	40	-4	40
5	Spokane Zephyr W	28	34	28	+6	39
6	DC Power W	28	34	32	+2	33
7	Brooklyn W	28	31	44	-13	26
8	Fort Lauderdale United W	28	30	62	-32	23
9	Tampa Bay Sun W	28	27	46	-19	24