Al Shabab vs Al-Nassr Statistics & Analysis

Al Shabab

May 07, 2026 - 18:00

2 1.40

4 2.22

xG Accuracy: 52%

Al-Nassr

Premium betting site 1xbet: New users can use the promo code 1x_3342271 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the model’s highlighted side (or lean) to what happened at full time.

Market Prediction Result Outcome
Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (6 goals) ✖ Incorrect
Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
1X2 Al-Nassr Al-Nassr ✔ Correct
Correct Score Insights 1-2 2-4 ✖ Incorrect

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Pre-match snapshot for this fixture.

League: Pro League
Fixture: Al Shabab vs Al-Nassr
Kickoff: 2026-05-13 17:00:00
1X2 (model): Home 22.6% · Draw 22.4% · Away 55.0%
xG (showing): Al Shabab 1.4 — Al-Nassr 2.22 (total xG ≈ 3.62)
Value headline: At least one tracked line reaches the headline EV threshold — align with the hero / Primary card if shown.
Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Over 2.5 (Under 2.5 29.9% · Over 2.5 70.1%); BTTS Yes (Yes 68.2% · No 31.8%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS Yes
BTTS (model): Yes 68.2% · No 31.8%
Correct score (top bin): 1-2 (9.2%)

Saying “no value” on a snapshot is a feature, not a bug: it protects readers from forcing a play when the edge is not there.

Most likely correct score stays a low-probability tail: use it for context, not as a must-bet story.

Best Bet + Reason

Skip unless odds move — the engine sees no line clearing the +EV gate.

When 1X2 is tight, prices often already embed the uncertainty — all three legs can be −EV, or show only small +EV that still fails the headline threshold — respect that when sizing.

Stake sizing should default to zero when no headline +EV exists — experimentation belongs in the discretionary bucket only.

FAQ

When would a headline +EV return?

When odds move enough that implied probabilities drop relative to the same model snapshot, or when more book prices arrive so EV can be computed reliably — then re-run the pipeline.

Is the most likely correct score still relevant?

As context only: it is still a low absolute probability tail outcome (often in the single digits, sometimes low teens). It does not override the “no headline +EV” stance — treat score bets as fun-sized if you play them at all.

Should I still read the 1X2 card?

Yes — it shows whether any winner price clears value. Here it often explains why there is no headline: probabilities can be clustered while prices already embed that uncertainty.

What do the grey “lean” labels mean then?

They summarise where the model tilts (e.g. Under 2.5 or BTTS No) without claiming a positive economic edge. Use them as context; size to zero unless you deliberately accept discretionary risk.

Risk Factors

Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Methodology

Inputs: Same structured facts bundle as the public prediction page (xG / Poisson snapshot, market EV where available, decision engine v2).
Compliance: Educational framing only; not personalised advice.

Last Updated

May 17, 2026 (UTC)

How to use this

When there is no Primary line, compare the +EV rows in the market cards below (not only 1X2).
Do not parlay many thin-edge picks together; edges do not add reliably.
Treat longshots as optional, high-stake-sizing plays only.

Explore More Predictions Content

Get Premium Predictions for Al Shabab & Al-Nassr!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now

Back to Statistics

Pro League — Standings

#	TEAM	MP	W	D	L	PTS
1	Al-Nassr	33	27	2	4	83
2	Al-Hilal Saudi FC	33	24	9	0	81
3	Al-Ahli Jeddah	33	24	6	3	78
4	Al-Qadisiyah FC	33	22	8	3	74
5	Al-Ittihad FC	32	16	7	9	55
6	Al Taawon	33	15	8	10	53
7	Al-Ettifaq	33	14	7	12	49
8	NEOM	33	12	8	13	44
9	Al-Hazm	33	10	9	14	39
10	Al-Fayha	33	10	8	15	38
11	Al Khaleej Saihat	33	10	7	16	37
12	Al-Fateh	33	9	9	15	36
13	Al Kholood	33	9	5	19	32
14	Al Shabab	32	7	11	14	32
15	Damac	33	6	11	16	29
16	Al Riyadh	33	6	9	18	27
17	Al Okhdood	33	5	5	23	20
18	Al Najma	33	2	7	24	13

#	TEAM	MP	GS	GC	+/-	PTS
1	Al-Nassr	33	87	27	+60	83
2	Al-Hilal Saudi FC	33	84	27	+57	81
3	Al-Qadisiyah FC	33	78	33	+45	74
4	Al-Ahli Jeddah	33	67	24	+43	78
5	Al Taawon	33	59	44	+15	53
6	Al Khaleej Saihat	33	53	58	-5	37
7	Al-Ittihad FC	32	52	40	+12	55
8	Al-Ettifaq	33	50	54	-4	49
9	NEOM	33	42	47	-5	44
10	Al-Fayha	33	41	53	-12	38
11	Al Shabab	32	41	54	-13	32
12	Al-Fateh	33	41	55	-14	36
13	Al Kholood	33	39	61	-22	32
14	Al-Hazm	33	36	57	-21	39
15	Al Riyadh	33	34	63	-29	27
16	Damac	33	31	51	-20	29
17	Al Najma	33	31	76	-45	13
18	Al Okhdood	33	27	69	-42	20

#	TEAM	MP	xG	xGC	+/-	PTS
1	Al-Nassr	33	65.9	24.9	+41.0	83
2	Al-Hilal Saudi FC	33	63.9	24.5	+39.4	81
3	Al-Ahli Jeddah	33	54.1	23.6	+30.5	78
4	Al-Qadisiyah FC	33	58.8	33.4	+25.4	74
5	Al-Ittihad FC	32	47.6	37.0	+10.6	55
6	NEOM	33	43.5	36.8	+6.7	44
7	Al Shabab	32	43.1	43.3	-0.2	32
8	Al Taawon	33	41.1	42.2	-1.1	53
9	Al Khaleej Saihat	33	39.8	41.3	-1.5	37
10	Al-Fateh	33	40.9	43.5	-2.6	36
11	Al-Fayha	33	33.1	42.3	-9.2	38
12	Al Riyadh	33	40.3	50.0	-9.7	27
13	Damac	33	24.2	37.4	-13.2	29
14	Al-Hazm	33	31.7	46.5	-14.8	39
15	Al Kholood	33	30.9	47.0	-16.1	32
16	Al-Ettifaq	33	38.4	54.9	-16.5	49
17	Al Najma	33	26.8	60.1	-33.3	13
18	Al Okhdood	33	25.0	60.7	-35.7	20