Statistics / Football / France. National 3 - Group F / Jura Dolois vs Strasbourg II

Jura Dolois vs Strasbourg II Statistics & Analysis

May 09, 2026 - 16:00
2 1.45
1 1.25
xG Accuracy: 80%
Premium betting site 1xbet: New users can use the promo code 1x_3342271 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the model’s highlighted side (or lean) to what happened at full time.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Over 2.5 (3 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS No Yes ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 Jura Dolois Jura Dolois ✔ Correct
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1 2-1 ✖ Incorrect

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

  • League: National 3 - Group F
  • Fixture: Jura Dolois vs Strasbourg II
  • Kickoff: 2026-05-09 16:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 45.0% · Draw 45.0% · Away 10.0%
  • xG (showing): Jura Dolois 1.45 — Strasbourg II 1.25 (total xG ≈ 2.7)
  • Value headline: None — no positive EV could be estimated on tracked lines at current best prices (missing odds or thin book depth).
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Over 2.5 (Under 2.5 46.9% · Over 2.5 53.1%); BTTS No (Yes 47.2% · No 52.8%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Over 2.5; BTTS No
  • BTTS (model): Yes 47.2% · No 52.8%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (11.5%)

Saying “no value” on a snapshot is a feature, not a bug: it protects readers from forcing a play when the edge is not there.

If lines move materially, re-run generation or refresh — implied probabilities and any future EV readouts will change first.

Best Bet + Reason

No clear +EV headline on this snapshot.

When 1X2 is tight, prices often already embed the uncertainty — all three legs can be −EV, or show only small +EV that still fails the headline threshold — respect that when sizing.

Re-check after material price moves; edges appear and disappear with liquidity.

FAQ

What do the grey “lean” labels mean then?

They summarise where the model tilts (e.g. Under 2.5 or BTTS No) without claiming a positive economic edge. Use them as context; size to zero unless you deliberately accept discretionary risk.

Is the most likely correct score still relevant?

As context only: it is still a low absolute probability tail outcome (often in the single digits, sometimes low teens). It does not override the “no headline +EV” stance — treat score bets as fun-sized if you play them at all.

Why is there no “best bet” on this page?

The headline engine uses a minimum +EV threshold (e.g. 2%) for a default pick. A line can still show tiny +EV that fails that bar — we still call it no default bet so readers do not over-size thin edges.

When would a headline +EV return?

When odds move enough that implied probabilities drop relative to the same model snapshot, or when more book prices arrive so EV can be computed reliably — then re-run the pipeline.

Risk Factors

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Methodology

  • Inputs: Same structured facts bundle as the public prediction page (xG / Poisson snapshot, market EV where available, decision engine v2).
  • Compliance: Educational framing only; not personalised advice.

Last Updated

May 17, 2026 (UTC)

How to use this
  • Focus on the Primary line when you want one actionable idea.
  • Do not parlay many thin-edge picks together; edges do not add reliably.
  • Treat longshots as optional, high-stake-sizing plays only.

Get Premium Predictions for Jura Dolois & Strasbourg II!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
National 3 - Group F National 3 - Group FStandings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Troyes II 25 14 6 5 48
2 Chalon 25 12 8 5 44
3 Thonon Évian 25 12 7 6 43
4 Jura Dolois 25 12 6 7 42
5 Racing Besançon 25 11 9 5 42
6 Pontarlier 25 9 9 7 36
7 Torcy 25 10 6 9 36
8 Ivry 25 8 8 9 32
9 Thaon 25 9 4 12 31
10 Belfort 25 7 9 9 30
11 Mulhouse 25 8 6 11 30
12 Strasbourg II 25 6 7 12 25
13 Sochaux II 25 6 6 13 24
14 Besançon 25 2 7 16 13
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Troyes II 25 51 30 +21 48
2 Thaon 25 42 40 +2 31
3 Thonon Évian 25 41 30 +11 43
4 Chalon 25 39 27 +12 44
5 Pontarlier 25 38 30 +8 36
6 Jura Dolois 25 36 29 +7 42
7 Belfort 25 36 32 +4 30
8 Racing Besançon 25 34 20 +14 42
9 Sochaux II 25 34 42 -8 24
10 Mulhouse 25 33 43 -10 30
11 Torcy 25 28 26 +2 36
12 Strasbourg II 25 27 48 -21 25
13 Ivry 25 24 28 -4 32
14 Besançon 25 16 54 -38 13