Haguenau vs Dieppe Statistics & Analysis

May 09, 2026 - 16:00
3 1.45
1 1.25
xG Accuracy: 61%
Premium betting site 1xbet: New users can use the promo code 1x_3342271 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the model’s highlighted side (or lean) to what happened at full time.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (4 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS No Yes ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 Haguenau Haguenau ✔ Correct
  • Correct Score Insights 1-0 3-1 ✖ Incorrect

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Quick read on how the model reads this matchup.

  • League: National 2 - Group B
  • Fixture: Haguenau vs Dieppe
  • Kickoff: 2026-05-09 16:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 41.8% · Draw 25.7% · Away 32.6%
  • xG (showing): Haguenau 1.45 — Dieppe 1.25 (total xG ≈ 2.7)
  • Best +EV line (same label as hero card when Primary thresholds are not met): Under 2.5 goals
  • Model: 62.3% · Implied: 56.0% · Probability edge: +6.3 pts · Est. EV: +4.0%
  • BTTS (model): Yes 42.9% · No 57.1%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-0 (13.9%)

Where EV is shown, it is estimated return per unit stake at the best tracked decimal price — not the same thing as a raw probability gap.

Early match state can move realised goals away from pre-kick projections.

Best Bet + Reason

Top tracked +EV leg right now (hero card, non-primary grading): Under 2.5 goals.

We separate probability edge (model minus implied, in points of probability) from estimated EV (economic edge at the best price shown on the page).

No pick is a guarantee; variance is especially large in scoreline markets.

FAQ

What is the best-supported line in this snapshot?

Match the hero card above: if it says “Betting Primary Pick”, that leg cleared primary rules; if it says “Best +EV (tracked markets)”, it is the strongest +EV line that did not meet stricter Primary thresholds. The bullets below repeat the same model %, implied %, edge (pts), and EV % as that card.

Safer market than correct score?

Markets with more liquidity and smoother prices (often 1X2 or O/U 2.5 from many books) are usually easier to reason about than long-tail correct-score prices; still read EV on each leg.

Is the most likely correct score a good bet?

Usually no as a standalone bet: the “most likely” scoreline is still a low absolute probability tail event (often single digits, sometimes low teens). Use it as context; keep any correct-score stake in the “fun / small” bucket.

Who has the edge in the match-winner market?

Use the 1X2 model percentages in the summary and the 1X2 market card: the side with the highest model % is the model lean, but check EV — a lean can still be -EV after prices.

Risk Factors

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Methodology

  • Inputs: Same structured facts bundle as the public prediction page (xG / Poisson snapshot, market EV where available, decision engine v2).
  • Compliance: Educational framing only; not personalised advice.

Last Updated

May 17, 2026 (UTC)

How to use this
  • Focus on the Primary line when you want one actionable idea.
  • Do not parlay many thin-edge picks together; edges do not add reliably.
  • Treat longshots as optional, high-stake-sizing plays only.

Get Premium Predictions for Haguenau & Dieppe!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
National 2 - Group B National 2 - Group BStandings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Thionville Lusitanos 29 18 6 5 60
2 Haguenau 29 14 8 7 50
3 Bourges Foot 18 29 13 10 6 49
4 Feignies-Aulnoye 29 12 9 8 45
5 St-Pryvé St-Hilaire 29 12 6 11 42
6 Furiani-Agliani 29 12 6 11 42
7 Dieppe 29 11 8 10 41
8 Bastia-Borgo 29 11 7 11 40
9 Biesheim 29 10 10 9 39
10 Epinal 29 10 7 12 37
11 Colmar 29 9 10 10 36
12 Wasquehal 29 10 3 16 33
13 Beauvais 29 8 11 10 32
14 Chambly Thelle FC 29 8 10 11 31
15 Chantilly 29 6 9 14 27
16 Blois 29 6 4 19 22
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Thionville Lusitanos 29 53 32 +21 60
2 St-Pryvé St-Hilaire 29 46 39 +7 42
3 Haguenau 29 42 28 +14 50
4 Feignies-Aulnoye 29 40 23 +17 45
5 Furiani-Agliani 29 40 38 +2 42
6 Colmar 29 38 40 -2 36
7 Beauvais 29 34 41 -7 32
8 Bourges Foot 18 29 33 24 +9 49
9 Bastia-Borgo 29 32 35 -3 40
10 Chambly Thelle FC 29 31 35 -4 31
11 Biesheim 29 30 32 -2 39
12 Chantilly 29 30 39 -9 27
13 Dieppe 29 29 32 -3 41
14 Epinal 29 29 35 -6 37
15 Blois 29 27 45 -18 22
16 Wasquehal 29 25 41 -16 33