Statistics / Football / Italy. Serie B / Venezia vs Palermo

Venezia vs Palermo Statistics & Analysis

May 08, 2026 - 18:30
2 1.85
0 1.00
xG Accuracy: 73%
Premium betting site 1xbet: New users can use the promo code 1x_3342271 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the model’s highlighted side (or lean) to what happened at full time.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (2 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 Venezia Venezia ✔ Correct
  • Correct Score Insights 1-0 2-0 ✖ Incorrect

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Pre-match snapshot for this fixture.

  • League: Serie B
  • Fixture: Venezia vs Palermo
  • Kickoff: 2026-05-09 13:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 55.9% · Draw 25.4% · Away 18.7%
  • xG (showing): Venezia 1.85 — Palermo 1.0 (total xG ≈ 2.85)
  • Best +EV line (same label as hero card when Primary thresholds are not met): Under 2.5 goals
  • Model: 45.8% · Implied: 42.9% · Probability edge: +2.9 pts · Est. EV: +4.9%
  • BTTS (model): Yes 54.7% · No 45.3%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-0 (10.7%)

Use the cards for tiering; this text only restates the same inputs in narrative form.

1X2 can look balanced even when side markets show clearer structure.

Best Bet + Reason

Best current value angle on the board — same leg as the “Best +EV” hero when Primary rules are not met: Under 2.5 goals.

We separate probability edge (model minus implied, in points of probability) from estimated EV (economic edge at the best price shown on the page).

Edges shrink quickly if prices move; always re-check the number on your book.

FAQ

What changes first if odds move?

Implied probabilities and EV move immediately with price; model probabilities in this snapshot do not update until the pipeline is re-run. Refresh after material line moves.

Is the most likely correct score a good bet?

Usually no as a standalone bet: the “most likely” scoreline is still a low absolute probability tail event (often single digits, sometimes low teens). Use it as context; keep any correct-score stake in the “fun / small” bucket.

What is the best-supported line in this snapshot?

Match the hero card above: if it says “Betting Primary Pick”, that leg cleared primary rules; if it says “Best +EV (tracked markets)”, it is the strongest +EV line that did not meet stricter Primary thresholds. The bullets below repeat the same model %, implied %, edge (pts), and EV % as that card.

How should I read EV versus a probability gap?

Probability edge = model probability minus implied probability (reported here in percentage points). EV ≈ model probability × best tracked decimal odds − 1, shown as return per unit stake. They are related but not interchangeable labels.

Risk Factors

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Methodology

  • Inputs: Same structured facts bundle as the public prediction page (xG / Poisson snapshot, market EV where available, decision engine v2).
  • Compliance: Educational framing only; not personalised advice.

Last Updated

May 17, 2026 (UTC)

How to use this
  • Focus on the Primary line when you want one actionable idea.
  • Do not parlay many thin-edge picks together; edges do not add reliably.
  • Treat longshots as optional, high-stake-sizing plays only.

Get Premium Predictions for Venezia & Palermo!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
Serie B Serie BStandings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Venezia 38 24 10 4 82
2 Frosinone 38 23 12 3 81
3 Monza 38 22 10 6 76
4 Palermo 38 20 12 6 72
5 Catanzaro 38 15 14 9 59
6 Modena 38 15 10 13 55
7 Juve Stabia 38 11 18 9 51
8 Avellino 38 13 10 15 49
9 Mantova 38 13 7 18 46
10 Padova 38 12 10 16 46
11 Cesena 38 12 10 16 46
12 Carrarese 38 10 14 14 44
13 Sampdoria 38 11 11 16 44
14 Virtus Entella 38 10 12 16 42
15 Empoli 38 9 14 15 41
16 Sudtirol 38 8 17 13 41
17 Bari 38 10 10 18 40
18 Reggiana 38 9 10 19 37
19 Spezia 38 8 11 19 35
20 Pescara 38 7 14 17 35
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Venezia 38 77 31 +46 82
2 Frosinone 38 76 34 +42 81
3 Catanzaro 38 62 51 +11 59
4 Monza 38 61 32 +29 76
5 Palermo 38 61 33 +28 72
6 Pescara 38 51 66 -15 35
7 Modena 38 49 36 +13 55
8 Carrarese 38 47 52 -5 44
9 Empoli 38 47 54 -7 41
10 Cesena 38 45 56 -11 46
11 Mantova 38 45 57 -12 46
12 Juve Stabia 38 44 45 -1 51
13 Avellino 38 43 55 -12 49
14 Spezia 38 43 59 -16 35
15 Padova 38 39 49 -10 46
16 Sudtirol 38 38 48 -10 41
17 Bari 38 38 60 -22 40
18 Virtus Entella 38 36 51 -15 42
19 Reggiana 38 36 56 -20 37
20 Sampdoria 38 35 48 -13 44
# TEAM MP xG xGC +/- PTS
1 Venezia 38 73.9 33.1 +40.8 82
2 Monza 38 56.5 34.9 +21.6 76
3 Palermo 38 57.5 43.0 +14.5 72
4 Frosinone 38 62.1 49.0 +13.1 81
5 Modena 38 49.2 38.5 +10.7 55
6 Cesena 38 51.7 46.5 +5.2 46
7 Sampdoria 38 38.6 35.7 +2.9 44
8 Empoli 38 46.3 44.1 +2.2 41
9 Juve Stabia 38 41.7 39.6 +2.1 51
10 Catanzaro 38 50.2 49.0 +1.2 59
11 Mantova 38 49.0 50.6 -1.6 46
12 Sudtirol 38 41.8 44.9 -3.1 41
13 Virtus Entella 38 45.0 48.5 -3.5 42
14 Spezia 38 46.9 50.5 -3.6 35
15 Carrarese 38 45.1 55.0 -9.9 44
16 Pescara 38 46.4 58.1 -11.7 35
17 Reggiana 38 33.8 48.8 -15.0 37
18 Avellino 38 33.6 51.9 -18.3 49
19 Padova 38 33.3 52.3 -19.0 46
20 Bari 38 33.3 61.8 -28.5 40