Statistics / Football / Italy. Serie B / Avellino vs Modena

Avellino vs Modena Statistics & Analysis

Avellino Avellino
May 08, 2026 - 18:30
1 1.22
0 1.03
xG Accuracy: 71%
Modena Modena
Premium betting site 1xbet: New users can use the promo code 1x_3342271 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the model’s highlighted side (or lean) to what happened at full time.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (1 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS No No ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 Avellino Avellino ✔ Correct
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1 1-0 ✖ Incorrect

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Pre-match snapshot for this fixture.

  • League: Serie B
  • Fixture: Avellino vs Modena
  • Kickoff: 2026-05-09 13:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 38.7% · Draw 32.0% · Away 29.2%
  • xG (showing): Avellino 1.22 — Modena 1.03 (total xG ≈ 2.25)
  • Value headline: At least one tracked line reaches the headline EV threshold — align with the hero / Primary card if shown.
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 60.9% · Over 2.5 39.1%); BTTS No (Yes 47.0% · No 53.0%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS No
  • BTTS (model): Yes 47.0% · No 53.0%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (13.2%)

Saying “no value” on a snapshot is a feature, not a bug: it protects readers from forcing a play when the edge is not there.

If lines move materially, re-run generation or refresh — implied probabilities and any future EV readouts will change first.

Best Bet + Reason

Skip unless odds move — the engine sees no line clearing the +EV gate.

The cards may still show value leans (e.g. a preferred Under or a BTTS side) where prices are inefficient or incomplete — that is not the same as a positive-EV ticket at the configured threshold.

Re-check after material price moves; edges appear and disappear with liquidity.

FAQ

Should I still read the 1X2 card?

Yes — it shows whether any winner price clears value. Here it often explains why there is no headline: probabilities can be clustered while prices already embed that uncertainty.

Is the most likely correct score still relevant?

As context only: it is still a low absolute probability tail outcome (often in the single digits, sometimes low teens). It does not override the “no headline +EV” stance — treat score bets as fun-sized if you play them at all.

When would a headline +EV return?

When odds move enough that implied probabilities drop relative to the same model snapshot, or when more book prices arrive so EV can be computed reliably — then re-run the pipeline.

What do the grey “lean” labels mean then?

They summarise where the model tilts (e.g. Under 2.5 or BTTS No) without claiming a positive economic edge. Use them as context; size to zero unless you deliberately accept discretionary risk.

Risk Factors

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Methodology

  • Inputs: Same structured facts bundle as the public prediction page (xG / Poisson snapshot, market EV where available, decision engine v2).
  • Compliance: Educational framing only; not personalised advice.

Last Updated

May 17, 2026 (UTC)

How to use this
  • When there is no Primary line, compare the +EV rows in the market cards below (not only 1X2).
  • Do not parlay many thin-edge picks together; edges do not add reliably.
  • Treat longshots as optional, high-stake-sizing plays only.

Get Premium Predictions for Avellino & Modena!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
Serie B Serie B — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Venezia 38 24 10 4 82
2 Frosinone 38 23 12 3 81
3 Monza 38 22 10 6 76
4 Palermo 38 20 12 6 72
5 Catanzaro 38 15 14 9 59
6 Modena 38 15 10 13 55
7 Juve Stabia 38 11 18 9 51
8 Avellino 38 13 10 15 49
9 Mantova 38 13 7 18 46
10 Padova 38 12 10 16 46
11 Cesena 38 12 10 16 46
12 Carrarese 38 10 14 14 44
13 Sampdoria 38 11 11 16 44
14 Virtus Entella 38 10 12 16 42
15 Empoli 38 9 14 15 41
16 Sudtirol 38 8 17 13 41
17 Bari 38 10 10 18 40
18 Reggiana 38 9 10 19 37
19 Spezia 38 8 11 19 35
20 Pescara 38 7 14 17 35
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Venezia 38 77 31 +46 82
2 Frosinone 38 76 34 +42 81
3 Catanzaro 38 62 51 +11 59
4 Monza 38 61 32 +29 76
5 Palermo 38 61 33 +28 72
6 Pescara 38 51 66 -15 35
7 Modena 38 49 36 +13 55
8 Carrarese 38 47 52 -5 44
9 Empoli 38 47 54 -7 41
10 Cesena 38 45 56 -11 46
11 Mantova 38 45 57 -12 46
12 Juve Stabia 38 44 45 -1 51
13 Avellino 38 43 55 -12 49
14 Spezia 38 43 59 -16 35
15 Padova 38 39 49 -10 46
16 Sudtirol 38 38 48 -10 41
17 Bari 38 38 60 -22 40
18 Virtus Entella 38 36 51 -15 42
19 Reggiana 38 36 56 -20 37
20 Sampdoria 38 35 48 -13 44
# TEAM MP xG xGC +/- PTS
1 Venezia 38 73.9 33.1 +40.8 82
2 Monza 38 56.5 34.9 +21.6 76
3 Palermo 38 57.5 43.0 +14.5 72
4 Frosinone 38 62.1 49.0 +13.1 81
5 Modena 38 49.2 38.5 +10.7 55
6 Cesena 38 51.7 46.5 +5.2 46
7 Sampdoria 38 38.6 35.7 +2.9 44
8 Empoli 38 46.3 44.1 +2.2 41
9 Juve Stabia 38 41.7 39.6 +2.1 51
10 Catanzaro 38 50.2 49.0 +1.2 59
11 Mantova 38 49.0 50.6 -1.6 46
12 Sudtirol 38 41.8 44.9 -3.1 41
13 Virtus Entella 38 45.0 48.5 -3.5 42
14 Spezia 38 46.9 50.5 -3.6 35
15 Carrarese 38 45.1 55.0 -9.9 44
16 Pescara 38 46.4 58.1 -11.7 35
17 Reggiana 38 33.8 48.8 -15.0 37
18 Avellino 38 33.6 51.9 -18.3 49
19 Padova 38 33.3 52.3 -19.0 46
20 Bari 38 33.3 61.8 -28.5 40
Popular Leagues