SV Rodinghausen vs Wiedenbrück Statistics & Analysis

SV Rodinghausen

May 09, 2026 - 12:00

0 1.45

1 1.25

xG Accuracy: 63%

Wiedenbrück

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

Market Prediction Result Outcome
Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (1 goals) ✔ Correct
Both Teams To Score BTTS No No ✔ Correct
1X2 SV Rodinghausen Wiedenbrück ✖ Incorrect
Correct Score Insights 1-1, 2-1, 1-2, 1-0, 2-2 0-1 ✖ Incorrect

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Aug 04, 2026 · 20:00 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-3003042

Closing Odds 1.53

AI Fair Odds —

CLV +0.0%

Final Result Wiedenbrück win · SV Rodinghausen 0–1 Wiedenbrück

Prediction ✖ Missed

Decision Grade C

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Market intelligence

Supporting read on how the prioritized closing feed moved versus the model — use after the Primary pick above.

Market briefing

Market remained largely stable before kickoff. No meaningful late implied-price shift was detected between PRE30 and PRE1 on the prioritized bookmaker snapshot.

Despite limited late movement, the model still prices Draw (1X2), Wiedenbrück (1X2), Under 2.5 goals meaningfully above what those closing snapshots implied — that gap is a static “model vs. price” read, not a late steam or chase story.

The model still exceeds closing implied on Wiedenbrück (1X2) by about 14.1 percentage points — the clearest mispricing signal summarized on this page.

Model vs. closing implied

Market	Model %	Closing impl. %	Gap (pp)
SV Rodinghausen (1X2)	41.8	59.9	-18.2
Draw (1X2)	25.7	21.6	+4.0
Wiedenbrück (1X2)	32.6	18.4	+14.1
Over 2.5 goals	50.6	62.4	-11.8
Under 2.5 goals	49.4	37.6	+11.8

What this means

In plain terms: the model lands near 32.6% on Wiedenbrück (1X2), while the closing snapshot implied about 18.4%. The difference — about 14.1 percentage points — is the largest model-vs.-market gap highlighted on this page.

Quick definitions: “closing implied” is the probability for that outcome implied by the final captured odds (after a simple de-vig). “Gap (pp)” is the model percentage minus that implied value, in percentage points (pp).

Closing-window line move

Single prioritized bookmaker per snapshot (not all books). Capture path: PRE30 → PRE1 · Book: Pinnacle

Column tags in parentheses: Closing uses the first available snapshot in PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Early uses the first available in PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 that is not the same capture as Closing.

Detailed capture odds are folded below — movement was negligible on de-vig implied prices.

View full line-by-line capture table

Market	Early (PRE30)	Closing (PRE1)
SV Rodinghausen (1X2)	1.53	1.53
Draw (1X2)	4.24	4.24
Wiedenbrück (1X2)	4.97	4.97
Over 2.5 goals	1.49	1.49
Under 2.5 goals	2.47	2.47

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

League: Regionalliga - West
Fixture: SV Rodinghausen vs Wiedenbrück
Kickoff: 2026-05-09 12:00:00
1X2 (model): Home 41.8% · Draw 25.7% · Away 32.6%
xG (showing): SV Rodinghausen 1.45 — Wiedenbrück 1.25 (total xG ≈ 2.7)
Value headline: At least one tracked line reaches the headline EV threshold — align with the hero / Primary card if shown.
Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Over 2.5 (Under 2.5 38.0% · Over 2.5 62.0%); BTTS No (Yes 45.1% · No 54.9%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS No
BTTS (model): Yes 45.1% · No 54.9%
Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (10.4%)

Saying “no value” on a snapshot is a feature, not a bug: it protects readers from forcing a play when the edge is not there.

Prefer skipping to over-staking when the engine is honest about missing edge.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: No Primary Bet

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 30, 2026 (UTC)

Explore More Predictions Content

Get Premium Predictions for SV Rodinghausen & Wiedenbrück!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now

Back to Statistics

Regionalliga - West — Standings

#	TEAM	MP	W	D	L	PTS
1	Fortuna Köln	34	20	10	4	70
2	Rot-weiss Oberhausen	34	19	9	6	66
3	Schalke 04 II	34	18	7	9	61
4	FC Gutersloh	34	16	11	7	59
5	Borussia Dortmund II	34	16	10	8	58
6	Borussia M'gladbach II	34	17	7	10	58
7	Sportfreunde Siegen	34	14	13	8	54
8	Paderborn II	34	12	10	12	46
9	Bonner SC	34	12	10	12	46
10	Köln II	34	13	6	15	45
11	Sportfreunde Lotte	34	11	12	11	45
12	Fortuna Düsseldorf II	34	11	7	16	40
13	FC Bocholt	34	10	9	15	39
14	Bochum II	34	9	12	13	39
15	SV Rodinghausen	34	7	8	19	29
16	Wiedenbrück	34	7	8	19	29
17	Wuppertaler SV	34	5	11	18	26
18	SSVg Velbert	34	6	7	21	25

#	TEAM	MP	GS	GC	+/-	PTS
1	Schalke 04 II	34	77	50	+27	61
2	Fortuna Köln	34	71	30	+41	70
3	Borussia Dortmund II	34	66	50	+16	58
4	Sportfreunde Siegen	34	62	43	+19	54
5	Borussia M'gladbach II	34	61	46	+15	58
6	Rot-weiss Oberhausen	34	60	40	+20	66
7	FC Gutersloh	34	55	40	+15	59
8	Köln II	34	55	63	-8	45
9	Paderborn II	34	52	38	+14	46
10	Bochum II	34	50	62	-12	39
11	FC Bocholt	34	49	57	-8	39
12	Fortuna Düsseldorf II	34	47	58	-11	40
13	SV Rodinghausen	34	46	63	-17	29
14	Sportfreunde Lotte	34	45	55	-10	45
15	Wiedenbrück	34	39	65	-26	29
16	Bonner SC	34	38	42	-4	46
17	Wuppertaler SV	34	36	70	-34	26
18	SSVg Velbert	34	35	72	-37	25