Statistics / Football / Germany. Regionalliga - West / SV Rodinghausen vs Wiedenbrück

SV Rodinghausen vs Wiedenbrück Statistics & Analysis

SV Rodinghausen SV Rodinghausen
May 09, 2026 - 12:00
0 1.45
1 1.25
xG Accuracy: 63%
Wiedenbrück Wiedenbrück
Premium betting site 1xbet: New users can use the promo code 1x_3342271 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the model’s highlighted side (or lean) to what happened at full time.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (1 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS No No ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 SV Rodinghausen Wiedenbrück ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1 0-1 ✖ Incorrect

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

  • League: Regionalliga - West
  • Fixture: SV Rodinghausen vs Wiedenbrück
  • Kickoff: 2026-05-09 12:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 41.8% · Draw 25.7% · Away 32.6%
  • xG (showing): SV Rodinghausen 1.45 — Wiedenbrück 1.25 (total xG ≈ 2.7)
  • Value headline: At least one tracked line reaches the headline EV threshold — align with the hero / Primary card if shown.
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Over 2.5 (Under 2.5 38.0% · Over 2.5 62.0%); BTTS No (Yes 45.1% · No 54.9%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS No
  • BTTS (model): Yes 45.1% · No 54.9%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (10.4%)

Saying “no value” on a snapshot is a feature, not a bug: it protects readers from forcing a play when the edge is not there.

Prefer skipping to over-staking when the engine is honest about missing edge.

Best Bet + Reason

No clear +EV headline on this snapshot.

The cards may still show value leans (e.g. a preferred Under or a BTTS side) where prices are inefficient or incomplete — that is not the same as a positive-EV ticket at the configured threshold.

Stake sizing should default to zero when no headline +EV exists — experimentation belongs in the discretionary bucket only.

FAQ

Why is there no “best bet” on this page?

The headline engine uses a minimum +EV threshold (e.g. 2%) for a default pick. A line can still show tiny +EV that fails that bar — we still call it no default bet so readers do not over-size thin edges.

Should I still read the 1X2 card?

Yes — it shows whether any winner price clears value. Here it often explains why there is no headline: probabilities can be clustered while prices already embed that uncertainty.

What do the grey “lean” labels mean then?

They summarise where the model tilts (e.g. Under 2.5 or BTTS No) without claiming a positive economic edge. Use them as context; size to zero unless you deliberately accept discretionary risk.

When would a headline +EV return?

When odds move enough that implied probabilities drop relative to the same model snapshot, or when more book prices arrive so EV can be computed reliably — then re-run the pipeline.

Risk Factors

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Methodology

  • Inputs: Same structured facts bundle as the public prediction page (xG / Poisson snapshot, market EV where available, decision engine v2).
  • Compliance: Educational framing only; not personalised advice.

Last Updated

May 17, 2026 (UTC)

How to use this
  • When there is no Primary line, compare the +EV rows in the market cards below (not only 1X2).
  • Do not parlay many thin-edge picks together; edges do not add reliably.
  • Treat longshots as optional, high-stake-sizing plays only.

Get Premium Predictions for SV Rodinghausen & Wiedenbrück!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
Regionalliga - West Regionalliga - West — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Fortuna Köln 34 20 10 4 70
2 Rot-weiss Oberhausen 34 19 9 6 66
3 Schalke 04 II 34 18 7 9 61
4 FC Gutersloh 34 16 11 7 59
5 Borussia Dortmund II 34 16 10 8 58
6 Borussia M'gladbach II 34 17 7 10 58
7 Sportfreunde Siegen 34 14 13 8 54
8 Paderborn II 34 12 10 12 46
9 Bonner SC 34 12 10 12 46
10 Köln II 34 13 6 15 45
11 Sportfreunde Lotte 34 11 12 11 45
12 Fortuna Düsseldorf II 34 11 7 16 40
13 FC Bocholt 34 10 9 15 39
14 Bochum II 34 9 12 13 39
15 SV Rodinghausen 34 7 8 19 29
16 Wiedenbrück 34 7 8 19 29
17 Wuppertaler SV 34 5 11 18 26
18 SSVg Velbert 34 6 7 21 25
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Schalke 04 II 34 77 50 +27 61
2 Fortuna Köln 34 71 30 +41 70
3 Borussia Dortmund II 34 66 50 +16 58
4 Sportfreunde Siegen 34 62 43 +19 54
5 Borussia M'gladbach II 34 61 46 +15 58
6 Rot-weiss Oberhausen 34 60 40 +20 66
7 FC Gutersloh 34 55 40 +15 59
8 Köln II 34 55 63 -8 45
9 Paderborn II 34 52 38 +14 46
10 Bochum II 34 50 62 -12 39
11 FC Bocholt 34 49 57 -8 39
12 Fortuna Düsseldorf II 34 47 58 -11 40
13 SV Rodinghausen 34 46 63 -17 29
14 Sportfreunde Lotte 34 45 55 -10 45
15 Wiedenbrück 34 39 65 -26 29
16 Bonner SC 34 38 42 -4 46
17 Wuppertaler SV 34 36 70 -34 26
18 SSVg Velbert 34 35 72 -37 25
Popular Leagues