Statistics / Football / Germany. Bundesliga / 1. FC Köln vs 1. FC Heidenheim

1. FC Köln vs 1. FC Heidenheim Statistics & Analysis

1. FC Köln 1. FC Köln
May 10, 2026 - 15:30
1 2.08
3 1.24
xG Accuracy: 46%
1. FC Heidenheim 1. FC Heidenheim
Premium betting site 1xbet: New users can use the promo code 1x_3342271 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the model’s highlighted side (or lean) to what happened at full time.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (4 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS No Yes ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 1. FC Köln 1. FC Heidenheim ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 2-1 1-3 ✖ Incorrect

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

  • League: Bundesliga
  • Fixture: 1. FC Köln vs 1. FC Heidenheim
  • Kickoff: 2026-05-09 13:30:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 55.5% · Draw 23.4% · Away 21.1%
  • xG (showing): 1. FC Köln 2.08 — 1. FC Heidenheim 1.24 (total xG ≈ 3.32)
  • Value headline: At least one tracked line reaches the headline EV threshold — align with the hero / Primary card if shown.
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Over 2.5 (Under 2.5 35.5% · Over 2.5 64.5%); BTTS No (Yes 63.4% · No 36.6%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS No
  • BTTS (model): Yes 63.4% · No 36.6%
  • Correct score (top bin): 2-1 (9.7%)

Saying “no value” on a snapshot is a feature, not a bug: it protects readers from forcing a play when the edge is not there.

If lines move materially, re-run generation or refresh — implied probabilities and any future EV readouts will change first.

Best Bet + Reason

No clear +EV headline on this snapshot.

The cards may still show value leans (e.g. a preferred Under or a BTTS side) where prices are inefficient or incomplete — that is not the same as a positive-EV ticket at the configured threshold.

Re-check after material price moves; edges appear and disappear with liquidity.

FAQ

Why is there no “best bet” on this page?

The headline engine uses a minimum +EV threshold (e.g. 2%) for a default pick. A line can still show tiny +EV that fails that bar — we still call it no default bet so readers do not over-size thin edges.

What do the grey “lean” labels mean then?

They summarise where the model tilts (e.g. Under 2.5 or BTTS No) without claiming a positive economic edge. Use them as context; size to zero unless you deliberately accept discretionary risk.

Is the most likely correct score still relevant?

As context only: it is still a low absolute probability tail outcome (often in the single digits, sometimes low teens). It does not override the “no headline +EV” stance — treat score bets as fun-sized if you play them at all.

Should I still read the 1X2 card?

Yes — it shows whether any winner price clears value. Here it often explains why there is no headline: probabilities can be clustered while prices already embed that uncertainty.

Risk Factors

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Methodology

  • Inputs: Same structured facts bundle as the public prediction page (xG / Poisson snapshot, market EV where available, decision engine v2).
  • Compliance: Educational framing only; not personalised advice.

Last Updated

May 17, 2026 (UTC)

How to use this
  • Focus on the Primary line when you want one actionable idea.
  • Do not parlay many thin-edge picks together; edges do not add reliably.
  • Treat longshots as optional, high-stake-sizing plays only.

Get Premium Predictions for 1. FC Köln & 1. FC Heidenheim!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
Bundesliga Bundesliga — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Bayern München 34 28 5 1 89
2 Borussia Dortmund 34 22 7 5 73
3 RB Leipzig 34 20 5 9 65
4 VfB Stuttgart 34 18 8 8 62
5 1899 Hoffenheim 34 18 7 9 61
6 Bayer Leverkusen 34 17 8 9 59
7 SC Freiburg 34 13 8 13 47
8 Eintracht Frankfurt 34 11 11 12 44
9 FC Augsburg 34 12 7 15 43
10 FSV Mainz 05 34 10 10 14 40
11 Union Berlin 34 10 9 15 39
12 Borussia Mönchengladbach 34 9 11 14 38
13 Hamburger SV 34 9 11 14 38
14 1. FC Köln 34 7 11 16 32
15 Werder Bremen 34 8 8 18 32
16 VfL Wolfsburg 34 7 8 19 29
17 1. FC Heidenheim 34 6 8 20 26
18 FC St. Pauli 34 6 8 20 26
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Bayern München 34 122 36 +86 89
2 VfB Stuttgart 34 71 49 +22 62
3 Borussia Dortmund 34 70 34 +36 73
4 Bayer Leverkusen 34 68 47 +21 59
5 RB Leipzig 34 66 47 +19 65
6 1899 Hoffenheim 34 65 52 +13 61
7 Eintracht Frankfurt 34 61 65 -4 44
8 SC Freiburg 34 51 57 -6 47
9 1. FC Köln 34 49 63 -14 32
10 FC Augsburg 34 45 61 -16 43
11 VfL Wolfsburg 34 45 69 -24 29
12 FSV Mainz 05 34 44 53 -9 40
13 Union Berlin 34 44 58 -14 39
14 Borussia Mönchengladbach 34 42 53 -11 38
15 1. FC Heidenheim 34 41 72 -31 26
16 Hamburger SV 34 40 54 -14 38
17 Werder Bremen 34 37 60 -23 32
18 FC St. Pauli 34 29 60 -31 26
# TEAM MP xG xGC +/- PTS
1 Bayern München 34 94.5 37.0 +57.5 89
2 Borussia Dortmund 34 60.5 38.5 +22.0 73
3 Bayer Leverkusen 34 60.9 43.0 +17.9 59
4 RB Leipzig 34 65.2 48.7 +16.5 65
5 VfB Stuttgart 34 59.0 47.2 +11.8 62
6 1899 Hoffenheim 34 53.4 50.0 +3.4 61
7 SC Freiburg 34 47.0 46.7 +0.3 47
8 1. FC Köln 34 50.0 52.1 -2.1 32
9 FSV Mainz 05 34 49.4 52.0 -2.6 40
10 Eintracht Frankfurt 34 42.8 49.0 -6.2 44
11 Borussia Mönchengladbach 34 41.3 50.8 -9.5 38
12 Union Berlin 34 41.7 51.7 -10.0 39
13 Werder Bremen 34 40.0 51.5 -11.5 32
14 FC Augsburg 34 44.7 59.4 -14.7 43
15 1. FC Heidenheim 34 44.9 59.9 -15.0 26
16 VfL Wolfsburg 34 43.6 60.3 -16.7 29
17 Hamburger SV 34 36.5 53.8 -17.3 38
18 FC St. Pauli 34 29.0 52.8 -23.8 26
Popular Leagues