Statistics / Football / Germany. Bundesliga / Bayern München vs 1. FC Heidenheim

Bayern München vs 1. FC Heidenheim Statistics & Analysis

May 02, 2026 - 13:30
3 3.24
3 1.16
xG Accuracy: 56%
Premium betting site 1xbet: New users can use the promo code 1x_3342271 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the model’s highlighted side (or lean) to what happened at full time.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Over 2.5 (6 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 Bayern München Draw ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 3-1 3-3 ✖ Incorrect

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

  • League: Bundesliga
  • Fixture: Bayern München vs 1. FC Heidenheim
  • Kickoff: 2026-05-02 13:30:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 77.0% · Draw 13.7% · Away 9.3%
  • xG (showing): Bayern München 3.24 — 1. FC Heidenheim 1.16 (total xG ≈ 4.4)
  • Primary / headline line (Betting Primary Pick when shown): BTTS Yes
  • Model: 66.6% · Implied: 59.5% · Probability edge: +7.2 pts · Est. EV: +6.6%
  • BTTS (model): Yes 66.6% · No 33.4%
  • Correct score (top bin): 3-1 (8.1%)

Totals and BTTS are evaluated against current market prices where available.

1X2 can look balanced even when side markets show clearer structure.

Best Bet + Reason

Primary angle highlighted on the page: BTTS Yes.

We separate probability edge (model minus implied, in points of probability) from estimated EV (economic edge at the best price shown on the page).

When several markets sit near +EV, keep stakes small — correlation means edges do not add cleanly.

FAQ

What is the best-supported line in this snapshot?

Match the hero card above: if it says “Betting Primary Pick”, that leg cleared primary rules; if it says “Best +EV (tracked markets)”, it is the strongest +EV line that did not meet stricter Primary thresholds. The bullets below repeat the same model %, implied %, edge (pts), and EV % as that card.

Is the most likely correct score a good bet?

Usually no as a standalone bet: the “most likely” scoreline is still a low absolute probability tail event (often single digits, sometimes low teens). Use it as context; keep any correct-score stake in the “fun / small” bucket.

Safer market than correct score?

Markets with more liquidity and smoother prices (often 1X2 or O/U 2.5 from many books) are usually easier to reason about than long-tail correct-score prices; still read EV on each leg.

What changes first if odds move?

Implied probabilities and EV move immediately with price; model probabilities in this snapshot do not update until the pipeline is re-run. Refresh after material line moves.

Risk Factors

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Methodology

  • Inputs: Same structured facts bundle as the public prediction page (xG / Poisson snapshot, market EV where available, decision engine v2).
  • Compliance: Educational framing only; not personalised advice.

Last Updated

May 17, 2026 (UTC)

How to use this
  • Focus on the Primary line when you want one actionable idea.
  • Do not parlay many thin-edge picks together; edges do not add reliably.
  • Treat longshots as optional, high-stake-sizing plays only.

Get Premium Predictions for Bayern München & 1. FC Heidenheim!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
Bundesliga BundesligaStandings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Bayern München 34 28 5 1 89
2 Borussia Dortmund 34 22 7 5 73
3 RB Leipzig 34 20 5 9 65
4 VfB Stuttgart 34 18 8 8 62
5 1899 Hoffenheim 34 18 7 9 61
6 Bayer Leverkusen 34 17 8 9 59
7 SC Freiburg 34 13 8 13 47
8 Eintracht Frankfurt 34 11 11 12 44
9 FC Augsburg 34 12 7 15 43
10 FSV Mainz 05 34 10 10 14 40
11 Union Berlin 34 10 9 15 39
12 Borussia Mönchengladbach 34 9 11 14 38
13 Hamburger SV 34 9 11 14 38
14 1. FC Köln 34 7 11 16 32
15 Werder Bremen 34 8 8 18 32
16 VfL Wolfsburg 34 7 8 19 29
17 1. FC Heidenheim 34 6 8 20 26
18 FC St. Pauli 34 6 8 20 26
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Bayern München 34 122 36 +86 89
2 VfB Stuttgart 34 71 49 +22 62
3 Borussia Dortmund 34 70 34 +36 73
4 Bayer Leverkusen 34 68 47 +21 59
5 RB Leipzig 34 66 47 +19 65
6 1899 Hoffenheim 34 65 52 +13 61
7 Eintracht Frankfurt 34 61 65 -4 44
8 SC Freiburg 34 51 57 -6 47
9 1. FC Köln 34 49 63 -14 32
10 FC Augsburg 34 45 61 -16 43
11 VfL Wolfsburg 34 45 69 -24 29
12 FSV Mainz 05 34 44 53 -9 40
13 Union Berlin 34 44 58 -14 39
14 Borussia Mönchengladbach 34 42 53 -11 38
15 1. FC Heidenheim 34 41 72 -31 26
16 Hamburger SV 34 40 54 -14 38
17 Werder Bremen 34 37 60 -23 32
18 FC St. Pauli 34 29 60 -31 26
# TEAM MP xG xGC +/- PTS
1 Bayern München 34 94.5 37.0 +57.5 89
2 Borussia Dortmund 34 60.5 38.5 +22.0 73
3 Bayer Leverkusen 34 60.9 43.0 +17.9 59
4 RB Leipzig 34 65.2 48.7 +16.5 65
5 VfB Stuttgart 34 59.0 47.2 +11.8 62
6 1899 Hoffenheim 34 53.4 50.0 +3.4 61
7 SC Freiburg 34 47.0 46.7 +0.3 47
8 1. FC Köln 34 50.0 52.1 -2.1 32
9 FSV Mainz 05 34 49.4 52.0 -2.6 40
10 Eintracht Frankfurt 34 42.8 49.0 -6.2 44
11 Borussia Mönchengladbach 34 41.3 50.8 -9.5 38
12 Union Berlin 34 41.7 51.7 -10.0 39
13 Werder Bremen 34 40.0 51.5 -11.5 32
14 FC Augsburg 34 44.7 59.4 -14.7 43
15 1. FC Heidenheim 34 44.9 59.9 -15.0 26
16 VfL Wolfsburg 34 43.6 60.3 -16.7 29
17 Hamburger SV 34 36.5 53.8 -17.3 38
18 FC St. Pauli 34 29.0 52.8 -23.8 26