Statistics / Football / Italy. Serie A / Napoli vs Bologna

Napoli vs Bologna Statistics & Analysis

May 11, 2026 - 18:45
2 1.49
3 0.71
xG Accuracy: 46%
Premium betting site 1xbet: New users can use the promo code 1x_3342271 to receive $100 cash.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the model’s highlighted side (or lean) to what happened at full time.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (5 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS No Yes ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 Napoli Bologna ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-0 2-3 ✖ Incorrect

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Quick read on how the model reads this matchup.

  • League: Serie A
  • Fixture: Napoli vs Bologna
  • Kickoff: 2026-05-10 13:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 54.4% · Draw 29.3% · Away 16.2%
  • xG (showing): Napoli 1.49 — Bologna 0.71 (total xG ≈ 2.2)
  • Primary / headline line (Betting Primary Pick when shown): Under 2.5 goals
  • Model: 62.3% · Implied: 50.5% · Probability edge: +11.8 pts · Est. EV: +20.9%
  • BTTS (model): Yes 40.9% · No 59.1%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-0 (16.5%)

Where EV is shown, it is estimated return per unit stake at the best tracked decimal price — not the same thing as a raw probability gap.

Correct score remains high-variance even when a line is most likely on paper.

Best Bet + Reason

The engine’s headline primary is: Under 2.5 goals.

We separate probability edge (model minus implied, in points of probability) from estimated EV (economic edge at the best price shown on the page).

When several markets sit near +EV, keep stakes small — correlation means edges do not add cleanly.

FAQ

Who has the edge in the match-winner market?

Use the 1X2 model percentages in the summary and the 1X2 market card: the side with the highest model % is the model lean, but check EV — a lean can still be -EV after prices.

How should I read EV versus a probability gap?

Probability edge = model probability minus implied probability (reported here in percentage points). EV ≈ model probability × best tracked decimal odds − 1, shown as return per unit stake. They are related but not interchangeable labels.

Why might 1X2 look unattractive while totals do not?

Tight 1X2 prices often embed a fair three-way split, so EV on match-winner can sit negative even when Over/Under or BTTS still diverges from the model — compare the 1X2 row on the market cards to O/U and BTTS.

What changes first if odds move?

Implied probabilities and EV move immediately with price; model probabilities in this snapshot do not update until the pipeline is re-run. Refresh after material line moves.

Risk Factors

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Methodology

  • Inputs: Same structured facts bundle as the public prediction page (xG / Poisson snapshot, market EV where available, decision engine v2).
  • Compliance: Educational framing only; not personalised advice.

Last Updated

May 17, 2026 (UTC)

How to use this
  • Focus on the Primary line when you want one actionable idea.
  • Do not parlay many thin-edge picks together; edges do not add reliably.
  • Treat longshots as optional, high-stake-sizing plays only.

Get Premium Predictions for Napoli & Bologna!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Statistics
Serie A Serie AStandings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Inter 36 27 4 5 85
2 Napoli 36 21 7 8 70
3 Juventus 36 19 11 6 68
4 AC Milan 36 19 10 7 67
5 AS Roma 36 21 4 11 67
6 Como 36 18 11 7 65
7 Atalanta 36 15 13 8 58
8 Bologna 36 15 7 14 52
9 Lazio 36 13 12 11 51
10 Udinese 36 14 8 14 50
11 Sassuolo 36 14 7 15 49
12 Torino 36 12 8 16 44
13 Parma 36 10 12 14 42
14 Genoa 36 10 11 15 41
15 Fiorentina 36 8 14 14 38
16 Cagliari 36 9 10 17 37
17 Lecce 36 8 8 20 32
18 Cremonese 36 7 10 19 31
19 Hellas Verona 36 3 11 22 20
20 Pisa 36 2 12 22 18
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Inter 36 85 31 +54 85
2 Como 36 60 28 +32 65
3 Juventus 36 59 30 +29 68
4 AS Roma 36 55 31 +24 67
5 Napoli 36 54 36 +18 70
6 AC Milan 36 50 32 +18 67
7 Atalanta 36 50 34 +16 58
8 Bologna 36 45 43 +2 52
9 Udinese 36 45 46 -1 50
10 Sassuolo 36 44 46 -2 49
11 Torino 36 41 59 -18 44
12 Genoa 36 40 48 -8 41
13 Lazio 36 39 37 +2 51
14 Fiorentina 36 38 49 -11 38
15 Cagliari 36 36 51 -15 37
16 Cremonese 36 30 53 -23 31
17 Parma 36 27 45 -18 42
18 Pisa 36 25 66 -41 18
19 Lecce 36 24 48 -24 32
20 Hellas Verona 36 24 58 -34 20
# TEAM MP xG xGC +/- PTS
1 Inter 36 67.0 32.2 +34.8 85
2 Juventus 36 61.6 30.7 +30.9 68
3 Como 36 57.0 32.3 +24.7 65
4 AC Milan 36 56.0 39.1 +16.9 67
5 Atalanta 36 55.1 40.7 +14.4 58
6 AS Roma 36 50.9 37.6 +13.3 67
7 Napoli 36 46.9 35.4 +11.5 70
8 Fiorentina 36 48.4 44.1 +4.3 38
9 Bologna 36 41.9 43.2 -1.3 52
10 Lazio 36 39.1 40.8 -1.7 51
11 Genoa 36 43.0 45.2 -2.2 41
12 Torino 36 42.9 49.1 -6.2 44
13 Udinese 36 41.2 49.9 -8.7 50
14 Hellas Verona 36 33.2 42.6 -9.4 20
15 Sassuolo 36 39.6 53.2 -13.6 49
16 Cagliari 36 32.5 50.5 -18.0 37
17 Pisa 36 37.3 56.7 -19.4 18
18 Cremonese 36 33.5 55.1 -21.6 31
19 Parma 36 30.6 52.7 -22.1 42
20 Lecce 36 28.2 54.6 -26.4 32