The model missed the final outcome (Draw 1–1).
The model had projected Al Shamal at 35.2%, but the full-time result went the other way.
Mercados rastreados versus resultado de tiempo completo
Grado de predicción
F
Cada fila compara el modelo previo al partido con el resultado de tiempo completo.
- Mercado Predicción Resultado Resultado
- Más / Menos 2.5 Menos de 2.5 Menos de 2.5 (2 objetivos) ✔ Correcto
- Ambos Equipos Marcarán BTTS No Sí ✖ Incorrecto
- 1X2 Al Shamal Dibujar ✖ Incorrecto
- Perspectivas de marcador exacto 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 1-1 ✔ Correcto
Modelo vs Mercado de Cierre
| Resultado | Modelo | Mercado de cierre | Diferencia | Señal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al Shamal | 35.2% | 43.7% | -8.5 pp | Market Higher |
| Draw | 29.6% | 24.7% | +4.9 pp | Aligned |
| Al Wakrah | 35.2% | 31.6% | +3.5 pp | Aligned |
The closing market estimates Al Shamal's win probability at 43.7%, compared with the model's estimate of 35.2%, a difference of 8.5 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
Después del tiempo completo, el resultado fue Draw 1–1.
Market Assessment
The market and model broadly agree on Al Shamal. The remaining divergence may reflect differences in team-strength assumptions rather than a directional disagreement.
- Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Under 2.5 goals aligned with the xG profile
- Exact score 1–1 fell within the model's highlighted bins
What failed
- Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS No; match finished BTTS Yes
- 1X2: model leaned Al Shamal; match finished Draw
Market lesson
The closing market differed from the model on Al Shamal by 8.5 percentage points (43.7% vs model 35.2%) — in this case the market view proved closer.
Casa de apuestas premium stake: los nuevos usuarios pueden usar el código promoFHn2uDc1 FHn2uDc1. Registrarse
Cronología de predicción
Cómo esta predicción pasó del pronóstico a la revisión a tiempo completo.
-
Sep 10, 2026 · 13:59 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Al Shamal 35.2% · Draw 29.6% · Al Wakrah 35.2%
- xG · Al Shamal 1.30 — Al Wakrah 1.30
-
Sep 10, 2026 · 13:30 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Al Shamal 2.18 · Draw 3.85 · Al Wakrah 3.01
- Implied 1X2 · Al Shamal 43.7% · Draw 24.7% · Al Wakrah 31.6%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Sep 10, 2026 · 13:59 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Al Shamal 2.18 · Draw 3.85 · Al Wakrah 3.01
- Implied 1X2 · Al Shamal 43.7% · Draw 24.7% · Al Wakrah 31.6%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Sep 10, 2026 · 14:00 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Draw · 1–1
-
FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Instantánea histórica
Congelado en el inicio: el resultado del modelo tal como estaba antes de que comenzara el partido.
Veredicto histórico:
Observe
Decisión histórica
No Primary Bet
Resultado
Missed
Métricas previas al partido (contexto histórico)
Fiabilidad de predicción
75/100
· High
- Validation: Pass
Evidencia
★★★★★
- No strong statistical edge
- Direction agrees with model lean
- Validation passed
Pricing proximity (inverse gap)
57/100
Betting Confidence
78/100
Validation Report
Immutable Snapshot
Closing Odds
2.18
AI Fair Odds
—
CLV
Pending
Final Result
Draw · Al Shamal 1–1 Al Wakrah
Prediction
✖ Missed
Decision Grade
F
Model Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Revisar preguntas frecuentes
- ¿Qué tan precisa fue la predicción?
- Esta página clasifica los mercados direccionales (1X2, Más/Menos de 2,5, BTTS) con respecto al resultado final. El grado de predicción refleja cuántos de esos mercados rastreados coincidieron con la realidad.
- ¿Qué mide la precisión xG?
- xG Accuracy compara el perfil de goles esperados previo al partido del modelo con el marcador real, no si todos los mercados acertaron. Una revisión direccional sólida puede coexistir con una puntuación de precisión xG moderada.
- ¿Por qué no se predijo la puntuación exacta?
- Los resultados de puntuación correcta son colas de baja probabilidad incluso cuando el modelo lee bien el perfil de coincidencia. Destacamos los contenedores de puntuación más altos para el contexto; faltar la línea exacta no invalida una revisión direccional.
- ¿Esto mejora el registro de IA?
- Cada partido finalizado se registra en nuestro proceso de validación. Las tasas de aciertos agregadas y los estudios CLV se publican por separado; esta página es el registro de auditoría por partido.
Las predicciones son sólo para fines informativos. Juega siempre de forma responsable y dentro de tus límites. El rendimiento pasado no garantiza resultados futuros.
El informe IA aún no está disponible para este partido. Vuelva a ejecutar «Generación masiva de cuotas» tras actualizar el servidor para generar el resumen.
View technical JSON
{
"bundle_version": 1,
"content_hash": "d0b3f35ab0b65b81e05e1dab65eeea5bf1c09d2ae83e218b50bedfd1a7f19237",
"decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
"facts": {
"ai_fp": {
"away_predicted_xg": 1.3,
"away_win_prob": 0.3517,
"away_win_prob_posterior": null,
"bayes_applied": 0,
"btts_no_prob": 0.455,
"btts_yes_prob": 0.546,
"dc_rho": -0.13,
"draw_prob": 0.2965,
"draw_prob_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_away": 2.84,
"fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_draw": 3.37,
"fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_home": 2.84,
"fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
"home_predicted_xg": 1.3,
"home_win_prob": 0.3517,
"home_win_prob_posterior": null,
"over_25_prob": 0.482,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under_25_prob": 0.518
},
"api_prediction": {
"advice": "Combo Double chance : draw or Al Shamal and +1.5 goals",
"main_pick_display": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"percent_away": "45%",
"percent_draw": "45%",
"percent_home": "10%",
"winner_name": "Al Shamal"
},
"away_xg": 1.3,
"betting_insight": {
"bet_label": "Al Shamal",
"confidence": null,
"main_pick_meta": {
"confidence": "low",
"display_text": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"edge": -0.0848,
"edge_gap": 0.0,
"market": "1X2",
"market_prob": 0.4366,
"model_prob": 0.3518,
"pick_type": "no_strong",
"probabilities": {
"away": 35.2,
"draw": 29.6,
"home": 35.2
},
"reason": "No clear edge in 1X2 market",
"selection": null,
"selection_name": null
},
"market_comparison": [
{
"affi_link": "",
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"odd": 2.18
}
],
"risk_color": null,
"risk_key": null,
"stacked_market": null,
"value_bet": {
"best_odds": 2.18,
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"display_market": "Al Shamal Win",
"is_value": false,
"label": "Home",
"market_fair_odds": 2.29,
"market_odds": 2.18,
"model_odds": 2.84,
"overround": 5.1,
"prob_edge": -10.7,
"value_pct": -23.2,
"value_rating": "no_value"
}
},
"betting_markets": {
"btts": {
"away_clean_sheet": 0,
"away_failed_to_score": 0,
"away_played": 2,
"away_score_rate": 72.7,
"home_clean_sheet": 0,
"home_failed_to_score": 0,
"home_played": 2,
"home_score_rate": 72.7,
"no_prob": 45.5,
"pick": "No",
"pick_prob": 54.5,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"yes_prob": 54.5
},
"correct_score": {
"away_expected": 1.3,
"home_expected": 1.3,
"scores": [
{
"away": 1,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.6
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 0,
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 9.7
},
{
"away": 0,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 9.7
},
{
"away": 2,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 8.2
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 2,
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 8.2
}
],
"source": "xG"
},
"double_chance": {
"options": [
{
"key": "1X",
"label": "Al Shamal or Draw",
"prob": 64.8
},
{
"key": "12",
"label": "Al Shamal or Al Wakrah",
"prob": 70.4
},
{
"key": "X2",
"label": "Draw or Al Wakrah",
"prob": 64.8
}
],
"pick_key": "12",
"pick_label": "Al Shamal or Al Wakrah",
"pick_prob": 70.4
},
"match_winner": {
"away_pct": 35.2,
"draw_pct": 29.6,
"home_pct": 35.2,
"lean_key": "home",
"lean_label": "Al Shamal"
},
"over_under": {
"api_hint": "+1.5",
"avg_total": 2.6,
"away_avg_scored": 2.5,
"confidence": "low",
"home_avg_scored": 1.5,
"over_prob": 48.2,
"pick": "Under 2.5",
"pick_prob": 51.8,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"total_expected": 2.6,
"under_prob": 51.8
},
"prob_source": "poisson",
"value_bet_enhanced": {
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"edge": 14.0,
"implied_prob": 26.0,
"is_value": true,
"label": "Draw",
"market": "Draw",
"model_prob": 29.6,
"odds": 3.85
}
},
"closing_line_bundle": {
"away_team": "Al Wakrah",
"closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
"away": 31.62,
"draw": 24.72,
"home": 43.66
},
"closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_fetched_at": "2026-09-10 13:59:47",
"early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"early_capture": "PRE30",
"early_fetched_at": "2026-09-10 13:30:14",
"has_data": true,
"home_team": "Al Shamal",
"largest_move_kind": null,
"max_abs_move_pp": 0.0,
"model_vs_closing": [
{
"closing_implied_pct": 43.66,
"gap_pp": -8.48,
"kind": "1x2_h",
"model_pct": 35.18
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 24.72,
"gap_pp": 4.92,
"kind": "1x2_d",
"model_pct": 29.65
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 31.62,
"gap_pp": 3.56,
"kind": "1x2_a",
"model_pct": 35.18
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 62.75,
"gap_pp": -14.55,
"kind": "ou_o",
"model_pct": 48.2
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 37.25,
"gap_pp": 14.55,
"kind": "ou_u",
"model_pct": 51.8
}
],
"movement": [
{
"closing": 2.18,
"early": 2.18,
"implied_closing_pct": 43.66,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 43.66,
"kind": "1x2_h"
},
{
"closing": 3.85,
"early": 3.85,
"implied_closing_pct": 24.72,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 24.72,
"kind": "1x2_d"
},
{
"closing": 3.01,
"early": 3.01,
"implied_closing_pct": 31.62,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 31.62,
"kind": "1x2_a"
},
{
"closing": 1.52,
"early": 1.52,
"implied_closing_pct": 62.75,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 62.75,
"kind": "ou_o"
},
{
"closing": 2.56,
"early": 2.56,
"implied_closing_pct": 37.25,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 37.25,
"kind": "ou_u"
}
],
"movement_negligible": true,
"same_bookmaker": true,
"top_value_gap": {
"gap_pp": 14.6,
"kind": "ou_u"
}
},
"correct_score_insight": {
"best_value": null,
"lean_card": {
"diff_pp": -0.7,
"ev": -0.055,
"has_edge": false,
"label": "1-1",
"market_odds": 7.5,
"market_prob": 0.1333,
"market_prob_pct": 13.3,
"model_prob": 0.126,
"model_prob_pct": 12.6,
"n_bookmakers": 9,
"status_key": "no_value"
},
"most_likely": {
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.6
},
"top5": [
{
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.6
},
{
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 9.7
},
{
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 9.7
},
{
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 8.2
},
{
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 8.2
}
]
},
"home_xg": 1.3,
"homepage_pick": null,
"market_cards": [
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.1518,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.395,
"edge": 0.0199,
"edge_pp": 2.0,
"market_prob": 0.3867,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.518,
"n_bookmakers": 11,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2087,
"best_odd": 1.51,
"edge": -0.0274,
"ev": -0.1153,
"implied_prob": 0.6133,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.5859
},
"p_final": 0.4066,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"raw_edge_pp": 13.1,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.2406,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0262,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.1518,
"best_odd": 2.395,
"edge": 0.0199,
"ev": -0.0262,
"implied_prob": 0.3867,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.4066
},
"value_side": "under"
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": -0.224,
"ev_over_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -22.4,
"text": "-22.4%"
},
"ev_under": 0.3261,
"ev_under_display": {
"capped": true,
"raw_pct": 32.6,
"text": "+25%+"
},
"featured": true,
"id": "ou_2_5",
"max_ev": 0.3261,
"n_bookmakers": 11,
"over_prob": 48.2,
"sort_key": 10443.49,
"tier": "best",
"under_prob": 51.8,
"value_side": "under"
},
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.1629,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.535,
"edge": 0.015,
"edge_pp": 1.5,
"market_prob": 0.3631,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.455,
"n_bookmakers": 11,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.1629,
"best_odd": 2.535,
"edge": 0.015,
"ev": -0.0417,
"implied_prob": 0.3631,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.378
},
"p_final": 0.378,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"raw_edge_pp": 9.2,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.1534,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0417,
"value_side": "no",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.224,
"best_odd": 1.445,
"edge": -0.0206,
"ev": -0.1094,
"implied_prob": 0.6369,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.6163
}
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": 0.2285,
"ev_no_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 22.9,
"text": "+22.9%"
},
"ev_yes": -0.1552,
"ev_yes_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -15.5,
"text": "-15.5%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "btts",
"max_ev": 0.2285,
"n_bookmakers": 11,
"no_prob": 45.5,
"sort_key": 10205.65,
"tier": "best",
"value_side": "no",
"yes_prob": 54.5
},
{
"authority_action": "no_bet",
"authority_note": "The market has moved toward Al Wakrah, but the model still strongly favours Al Shamal.",
"consensus_odds": 2.18,
"decision": "no_bet",
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"ev": -0.1209,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -12.1,
"text": "-12.1%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "1x2",
"implied_prob": 0.4366,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"max_ev": 0.0044,
"max_ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 0.4,
"text": "+0.4%"
},
"model_prob": 0.3518,
"raw_edge_display": "-8.5 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -8.5,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2331,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-23.3%",
"show_primary_label": false,
"side_label": "Al Shamal",
"sort_key": 5203.52,
"tier": "lean"
},
{
"featured": false,
"id": "correct_score",
"sort_key": 817.8,
"tier": "risk",
"top_label": "1-1",
"top_prob": 12.6
}
],
"market_intelligence": {
"betting_signal": {
"alert_breadth": "8/14",
"alert_breadth_note": "8/14 sportsbooks confirmed",
"alert_move": "\u2193 -6.2%",
"alert_team": "Al Wakrah",
"alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
"divergence_pp": 8.5,
"has_alert": true,
"hero_edge_pp": -8.49,
"hero_label": "Al Shamal",
"market_prob_pct": 43.7,
"market_team": "Al Shamal",
"model_prob_pct": 35.2,
"model_team": "Al Shamal",
"show": true,
"status_icon": "\u2713",
"status_key": "aligned",
"status_label": "Reliable prediction",
"status_line": "Direction aligned; check pricing gap separately",
"steam_score": 42,
"steam_subtitle": "Moderate sharp signal",
"steam_tier": "B",
"title": "Betting Signal"
},
"decision_chain": {
"academy_links": [
{
"key": "steam",
"read_min": 4,
"title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
"url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
},
{
"key": "clv_pending",
"read_min": 3,
"title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
"url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
}
],
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 8.5,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 8.5,
"summary": "The market has moved toward Al Wakrah, but the model still strongly favours Al Shamal."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 8.5,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 8.5,
"summary": "The market has moved toward Al Wakrah, but the model still strongly favours Al Shamal."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.3261,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.3261,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 4.5,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 32,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Al Shamal at 35.2%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 43.7%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Al Shamal as the value side (35.2%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 8.5,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved toward Al Wakrah, but the model still strongly favours Al Shamal.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Al Shamal",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +32.6% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +32.6% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +32.6% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "73 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "32 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+32.6% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 6,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved toward Al Wakrah, but the model still strongly favours Al Shamal.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 73,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved toward Al Wakrah, but the model still strongly favours Al Shamal.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1209,
"consensus_ev_display": "-12.1%",
"consensus_odds": 2.18,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.4366,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3518,
"raw_edge_display": "-8.5 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -8.5,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.4587155963302752,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2331,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-23.3%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -3.7,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.0 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.0
}
}
},
"bet_status": "no_bet",
"books_breadth_display": "8/14",
"breadth_ratio": 0.5714285714285714,
"evidence": {
"score": 68,
"signals": [
{
"icon": "\u25cb",
"key": "statistical_edge",
"label": "No strong statistical edge",
"status": "neutral"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "market_agreement",
"label": "Direction agrees; pricing still diverges",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "steam",
"label": "Sharp steam conflicts with model",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "\u2713",
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation passed",
"status": "pass"
}
],
"stars": 3,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"forecast_reliability": {
"breakdown": [
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation: Pass",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"label": "Steam conflicts with model",
"tone": "caution"
}
],
"parts": {
"alignment": 20.8,
"data_quality": 12.0,
"market_coverage": 5.7,
"steam_coherence": 0.0,
"validation": 30.0
},
"score": 73,
"stars": 3,
"tier": "high",
"tier_label": "High"
},
"lean_gap_pp": 8.49,
"market_agreement": "moderate",
"max_gap_pp": 8.49,
"model_calibration": {
"away_xg": 1.3,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": -4.0,
"elevated": false,
"home_xg": 1.3,
"impact_note": "",
"league_avg_xg": 1.35,
"peak_xg": 1.3,
"status_label": "Within typical league range",
"summary": "Home xG 1.30 \u00b7 Away xG 1.30 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation -4%",
"title": "Model Calibration Check"
},
"move_is_drift": false,
"mv_status": "pass",
"odds_delta_pct": -6.2,
"steam_conflicts": true,
"steam_move_display": "\u2193 -6.2%",
"steam_team": "Al Wakrah",
"suppress_execution": false,
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 32,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 19,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 35,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 19,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"verdict": {
"agree_note": "The market has moved toward Al Wakrah, but the model still strongly favours Al Shamal.",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 8.5,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 8.5,
"summary": "The market has moved toward Al Wakrah, but the model still strongly favours Al Shamal."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 8.5,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 8.5,
"summary": "The market has moved toward Al Wakrah, but the model still strongly favours Al Shamal."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.3261,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.3261,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 4.5,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 32,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Al Shamal at 35.2%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 43.7%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Al Shamal as the value side (35.2%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 8.5,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved toward Al Wakrah, but the model still strongly favours Al Shamal.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Al Shamal",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +32.6% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +32.6% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +32.6% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "73 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "32 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+32.6% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 6,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved toward Al Wakrah, but the model still strongly favours Al Shamal.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 73,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved toward Al Wakrah, but the model still strongly favours Al Shamal.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1209,
"consensus_ev_display": "-12.1%",
"consensus_odds": 2.18,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.4366,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3518,
"raw_edge_display": "-8.5 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -8.5,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.4587155963302752,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2331,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-23.3%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -3.7,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.0 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.0
}
}
},
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"subline": "The market has moved toward Al Wakrah, but the model still strongly favours Al Shamal.",
"tier": "observe"
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Al Shamal 1.30 xG vs Al Wakrah 1.30 \u2192 Al Shamal 35.2%",
"Market: Al Shamal ~43.7% implied",
"Market Steam: Al Wakrah \u2193 -6.2%"
],
"one_liner": "Model favours Al Shamal, but sharp money moved toward Al Wakrah.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"edge_rows": [
{
"edge_pp": -8.49,
"fair_prob": 35.17,
"label": "Al Shamal",
"market_prob": 43.66,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "home"
},
{
"edge_pp": 4.93,
"fair_prob": 29.65,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob": 24.72,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "draw"
},
{
"edge_pp": 3.55,
"fair_prob": 35.17,
"label": "Al Wakrah",
"market_prob": 31.62,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "away"
},
{
"edge_pp": -13.21,
"fair_prob": 48.2,
"label": "Over 2.5",
"market_prob": 61.41,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "over"
},
{
"edge_pp": 13.21,
"fair_prob": 51.8,
"label": "Under 2.5",
"market_prob": 38.59,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "under"
},
{
"edge_pp": -8.84,
"fair_prob": 54.5,
"label": "BTTS Yes",
"market_prob": 63.34,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "yes"
},
{
"edge_pp": 8.84,
"fair_prob": 45.5,
"label": "BTTS No",
"market_prob": 36.66,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "no"
}
],
"edge_snapshot": {
"edge_label": "mild_disagreement",
"edge_pp": -8.49,
"fair_prob_pct": 35.17,
"hero_side": "home",
"hero_team_name": "Al Shamal",
"market_prob_pct": 43.66,
"status": "market_ahead",
"steam_team_name": "Al Wakrah"
},
"fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
"fair_vs_market": {
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"comparison_available": true,
"comparison_disabled": false,
"comparison_summary": "The closing market estimates Al Shamal\u0027s win probability at 43.7%, compared with the model\u0027s estimate of 35.2%, a difference of 8.5 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.",
"degraded_note": "",
"divergence_guard": {
"divergence_level": "moderate",
"edge_status": "market_ahead",
"max_gap_pp": 8.49,
"suppress_hero": false,
"suppress_value_language": false
},
"divergence_label": "Moderate model-market divergence",
"divergence_level": "moderate",
"divergence_level_label": "Moderate divergence",
"divergence_note": "Fair estimate and market pricing differ modestly. Monitor before kickoff.",
"divergence_tier": "moderate",
"edge_label": "Mild disagreement",
"edge_label_key": "mild_disagreement",
"fair_confidence": "medium",
"fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
"fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"forecast_assessment": {
"favourite_class": "Balanced match",
"favourite_label": "Al Shamal",
"forecast_certainty_tier": "low",
"headline": "Balanced match",
"market_agreement_label": "Moderate",
"market_direction": {
"label": "Conflicts with model",
"positive": false
},
"market_prob_pct": 43.7,
"model_prob_gap_display": "-8.5 percentage points",
"model_prob_gap_pp": -8.5,
"model_prob_pct": 35.2,
"outcome_separation_tier": "low",
"paragraphs": [],
"pricing_convergence": {
"gap_display": "-8.5 percentage points",
"gap_pp": -8.5,
"label": "Moderate",
"label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_moderate"
},
"reliability_headline": "Moderate reliability",
"reliability_icon": "\u2713",
"reliability_score": 73,
"reliability_tier": "moderate",
"summary": "The market has moved toward Al Wakrah, but the model still strongly favours Al Shamal. This disagreement reduces confidence and prevents a Primary bet.",
"tier": "balanced",
"title": "Prediction Assessment",
"validation_label": "Pass",
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 32,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 19,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 35,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 19,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Al Shamal 1.30 xG vs Al Wakrah 1.30 \u2192 Al Shamal 35.2%",
"Market: Al Shamal ~43.7% implied",
"Market Steam: Al Wakrah \u2193 -6.2%"
],
"one_liner": "Model favours Al Shamal, but sharp money moved toward Al Wakrah.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"forecast_certainty": {
"note": "Three outcomes remain closely bunched \u2014 treat as a relatively open match.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"forecast_certainty_label": "Low",
"has_market_probs": true,
"hero_edge_pp": -8.49,
"hero_label": "Al Shamal",
"hero_side": "home",
"market_activity": "Al Wakrah odds shortened \u2193 -6.2%.",
"market_agreement": "moderate",
"market_agreement_label": "Moderate",
"market_interpretation": {
"bullets": [
"Monitor line movement before kickoff \u2014 not a betting recommendation."
],
"follow_up": "However, recent buying interest has been on Al Wakrah, with odds shortening by 6.2%.",
"gap_tier": "mild",
"lead": "The market and model broadly agree on Al Shamal. The remaining divergence may reflect differences in team-strength assumptions rather than a directional disagreement.",
"note": "Buying interest on Al Wakrah \u2014 odds shortened by 6.2%.",
"paragraphs": [
"The market and model broadly agree on Al Shamal. The remaining divergence may reflect differences in team-strength assumptions rather than a directional disagreement.",
"However, recent buying interest has been on Al Wakrah, with odds shortening by 6.2%.",
"Buying interest on Al Wakrah \u2014 odds shortened by 6.2%."
],
"quiet_market": false,
"title": "Market Assessment"
},
"market_narrative": {
"paragraphs": [
"The market still prices Al Shamal above the current fair estimate.",
"At the same time, Al Wakrah has attracted buying interest, with odds shortening by 6.2%."
],
"title": "Current Market Narrative"
},
"market_source": "closing_1x2",
"max_gap_pp": 8.49,
"model_validation": {
"score_label_key": "mi_mv_pass",
"status": "pass"
},
"model_validation_label": "Pass",
"outcome_separation": {
"breakdown": [
"No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
"Top two 1X2 outcomes within 0.0 percentage points."
],
"lead_gap_pp": 0.0,
"max_prob_pct": 35.2,
"note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"outcome_separation_label": "Low",
"overall_assessment": {
"badge_class": "moderate",
"largest_gap_label": "Al Shamal",
"largest_gap_pp": -8.5,
"lead": "The closing market prices Al Shamal higher than the statistical model.",
"level": "moderate",
"max_gap_pp": 8.5,
"title": "Moderate Disagreement"
},
"rows": [
{
"difference_pp": -8.49,
"edge_pp": -8.49,
"fair_prob_pct": 35.17,
"is_hero": true,
"label": "Al Shamal",
"market_prob_pct": 43.66,
"side": "home",
"signal_key": "market_higher",
"signal_label": "Market Higher"
},
{
"difference_pp": 4.93,
"edge_pp": 4.93,
"fair_prob_pct": 29.65,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob_pct": 24.72,
"side": "draw",
"signal_key": "aligned",
"signal_label": "Aligned"
},
{
"difference_pp": 3.55,
"edge_pp": 3.55,
"fair_prob_pct": 35.17,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Al Wakrah",
"market_prob_pct": 31.62,
"side": "away",
"signal_key": "aligned",
"signal_label": "Aligned"
}
],
"status": "market_ahead",
"status_label": "Market Ahead",
"steam_note": "Buying interest on Al Wakrah \u2014 odds shortened by 6.2%.",
"unavailable_note": ""
},
"interpretation": {
"has_conflict": true,
"paragraphs": [
"The betting market strongly prefers Al Shamal (43.7%).",
"Al Wakrah has attracted notable multi-book line movement (\u2193 -6.2%, 8/14).",
"This creates a conflict: Model \u2192 Al Shamal, Market \u2192 Al Shamal, Recent sharp money \u2192 Al Wakrah.",
"Because signals disagree, confidence remains limited."
],
"show": true,
"title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
},
"lifecycle": {
"closing_implied_pct": 45.87,
"closing_odds": 2.18,
"closing_reason": "",
"closing_status": "recorded",
"closing_status_label": "Recorded",
"clv_pending": true,
"clv_pp": 0.0,
"clv_reason": "",
"clv_status": "pending",
"context": "match",
"current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
"current_stage_detail": "",
"current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
"entry_implied_pct": 45.87,
"entry_odds": 2.18,
"match_phase": "upcoming",
"match_phase_detail": "",
"match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
"match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
"model_validation_label": "Pass",
"model_validation_status": "pass",
"stages": [
{
"detail": "",
"id": "forecast_generated",
"label": "Prediction Generated",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "market_detected",
"label": "Market Compared",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "model_validated",
"label": "Validation Passed",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "PRE1",
"id": "closing_recorded",
"label": "Closing Recorded",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "clv_evaluated",
"label": "CLV Evaluated",
"status": "pending"
}
]
},
"market_move_intelligence": {
"books_reacting": 8,
"books_reacting_detail": [
{
"bookmaker_id": 21,
"bookmaker_name": "888Sport",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -28.8%",
"odds_delta_pct": -28.8
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 7,
"bookmaker_name": "William Hill",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -21.2%",
"odds_delta_pct": -21.2
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 3,
"bookmaker_name": "Betfair",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -8.7%",
"odds_delta_pct": -8.7
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 8,
"bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -6.2%",
"odds_delta_pct": -6.2
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 34,
"bookmaker_name": "Superbet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -4.5%",
"odds_delta_pct": -4.5
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 9,
"bookmaker_name": "Dafabet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -3.5%",
"odds_delta_pct": -3.5
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 32,
"bookmaker_name": "Betano",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -3.4%",
"odds_delta_pct": -3.4
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 1,
"bookmaker_name": "10Bet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -2.8%",
"odds_delta_pct": -2.8
}
],
"books_total": 14,
"breadth_display": "8/14",
"clv_label": "+0.00 pp",
"clv_status": "evaluated",
"current_odds": 2.7,
"is_drift": false,
"move_context": "Largest move today",
"move_display": "\u2193 -6.2%",
"move_pct_abs": 6.2,
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 24h 39m",
"narrative_paragraphs": [
"Betfair led repricing on Al Wakrah (6.2%) \u2014 sharp book moved before wider follow-through.",
"A meaningful move led by sharper sportsbooks, with moderate market confirmation."
],
"narrative_title": "Market Narrative",
"odds_delta_pct": -6.2,
"odds_path": {
"chart_y_labels": [
"3.01",
"2.85",
"2.70"
],
"display": "3.01 \u2192 2.05 \u2192 2.70",
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 24h 39m",
"pick_team": "Al Wakrah",
"points": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "3.01"
},
{
"label_key": "extreme",
"value": "2.05"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "2.70"
}
],
"sparkline_points": [
2.88,
3.01,
2.7
],
"sparkline_polyline": "0.0,7.5 28.0,0.0 56.0,18.0",
"sparkline_trend": "down",
"sparkline_trend_label": "One-way drop",
"summary_boxes": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "2.88"
},
{
"label_key": "low",
"value": "2.70"
},
{
"label_key": "high",
"value": "3.01"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "2.70"
}
]
},
"open_odds": 2.88,
"page_alert_line": "Strong steam move across 8/14 sportsbooks on Al Wakrah",
"phase_label": "Sharp repricing",
"phase_tip": "Aggressive adjustment \u2014 often sharp-led or high consensus.",
"pick_team": "Al Wakrah",
"ref_book": "Bet365",
"seo_title_alert": "",
"sharp_leader": "Betfair",
"show": true,
"signal_badge_class": "confirm",
"signal_icon": "\u26a1",
"signal_impact": {
"current_odds": 2.7,
"is_drift": false,
"label": "Sharp signal",
"move_display": "\u2193 -6.2%",
"open_odds": 2.88,
"summary": "Market moved toward Al Wakrah while the model still favours another side.",
"team": "Al Wakrah",
"tone": "against"
},
"signal_key": "sharp_led",
"signal_label": "Sharp-led move",
"steam_score": 42,
"steam_subtitle": "Moderate sharp signal",
"steam_tier": "B",
"title": "Market Move Intelligence"
},
"market_overview": {
"breadth_display": "8/14",
"current_odds": 2.7,
"move_display": "\u2193 -6.2%",
"open_odds": 2.88,
"pick_team": "Al Wakrah",
"steam_score": 42,
"steam_team_name": "Al Wakrah",
"steam_tier": "B"
},
"premium_teaser": {
"current_divergence_pp": 8.5,
"divergence_label": "Current divergence",
"title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
"unlock_items": [
"Historical similar matches",
"Closing odds analysis",
"CLV tracking",
"Sharp money signals",
"Market efficiency rating",
"Historical model vs market results"
],
"unlock_label": "Unlock"
},
"show": true
},
"match": {
"at2.away_team_slug": "al-wakrah",
"away_expected_goals": null,
"away_goal_display": null,
"away_team_display_name": "Al Wakrah",
"away_team_id": 2900,
"away_team_logo": "/static/teams/2900.webp",
"away_team_name": "Al Wakrah",
"away_team_public_id": "0mEujOZjwbkPK4",
"away_team_slug": "al-wakrah",
"country_code": "QA",
"country_display_name": "Qatar",
"country_flag": "/static/images/country/qa.svg",
"country_id": 130,
"country_name": "Qatar",
"fixture_id": 1597931,
"goals_away": null,
"goals_home": null,
"home_expected_goals": null,
"home_goal_display": null,
"home_team_country": "Qatar",
"home_team_display_name": "Al Shamal",
"home_team_id": 2916,
"home_team_logo": "/static/teams/2916.webp",
"home_team_name": "Al Shamal",
"home_team_public_id": "208rMudvL4OTTi",
"home_team_slug": "al-shamal",
"ht.home_team_slug": "al-shamal",
"league_country": "Qatar",
"league_country_display": "Qatar",
"league_display_name": "Liga de las Estrellas de Qatar",
"league_id": 305,
"league_logo": "/static/leagues/305.webp",
"league_name": "Liga de las Estrellas de Qatar",
"league_public_id": "5TnXdQkMxY81rJ",
"league_season": 2026,
"match_date": "2026-09-10 14:00:00",
"public_id": "0lzjgwJshl9hVh",
"score_fulltime_away": null,
"score_fulltime_home": null,
"score_penalty_away": null,
"score_penalty_home": null,
"status_long": "Not Started",
"status_short": "NS",
"venue_city": "Wakla",
"venue_name": "Saoud bin Abdulrahman Stadium"
},
"match_decision": {
"confidence": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_md_top_two_close",
"pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
"Top two outcomes relatively close in probability (\u22120.5)",
"At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
],
"score": 6.0
},
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
"away": {
"alpha": 0.284,
"best_odd": 3.01,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0101,
"ev": -0.0178,
"implied_prob": 0.3162,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.3162,
"draw": 0.2472,
"home": 0.4366
},
"model_prob": 0.3518,
"p_final": 0.3263
},
"draw": {
"alpha": 0.2778,
"best_odd": 3.85,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0137,
"ev": 0.0044,
"implied_prob": 0.2472,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.3162,
"draw": 0.2472,
"home": 0.4366
},
"model_prob": 0.2965,
"p_final": 0.2609
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"alpha": 0.3928,
"best_odd": 2.18,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.0333,
"ev": -0.1209,
"implied_prob": 0.4366,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.3162,
"draw": 0.2472,
"home": 0.4366
},
"model_prob": 0.3518,
"p_final": 0.4033
}
},
"1x2_outlier": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
"away": {
"best_odd": 3.01,
"edge": 0.0195,
"ev": 0.0588,
"implied_prob": 0.3322,
"model_prob": 0.3518
},
"draw": {
"best_odd": 3.85,
"edge": 0.0367,
"ev": 0.1413,
"implied_prob": 0.2597,
"model_prob": 0.2965
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"best_odd": 2.18,
"edge": -0.1069,
"ev": -0.2331,
"implied_prob": 0.4587,
"model_prob": 0.3518
}
},
"btts": {
"alpha_no": 0.1629,
"alpha_yes": 0.224,
"best_no_odd": 2.7,
"best_yes_odd": 1.55,
"btts_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"edge_no": 0.0884,
"edge_yes": -0.0884,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": 0.2285,
"ev_no_risk_adj": -0.0417,
"ev_yes": -0.1552,
"ev_yes_risk_adj": -0.1094,
"implied_no": 0.3666,
"implied_yes": 0.6334,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"n_bookmakers": 11,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.1629,
"best_odd": 2.535,
"edge": 0.015,
"ev": -0.0417,
"implied_prob": 0.3631,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.378
},
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.224,
"best_odd": 1.445,
"edge": -0.0206,
"ev": -0.1094,
"implied_prob": 0.6369,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.6163
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 11,
"p_final_no": 0.378,
"p_final_yes": 0.6163,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"reliability": "medium"
},
"ou25": {
"alpha_over": 0.2087,
"alpha_under": 0.1518,
"best_over_odd": 1.61,
"best_under_odd": 2.56,
"consensus_over_odd": 1.51,
"consensus_under_odd": 2.395,
"edge_over": -0.1321,
"edge_under": 0.1321,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": -0.224,
"ev_over_risk_adj": -0.1153,
"ev_under": 0.3261,
"ev_under_risk_adj": -0.0262,
"implied_over": 0.6141,
"implied_over_mf": 0.6133,
"implied_under": 0.3859,
"implied_under_mf": 0.3867,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"n_bookmakers": 11,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2087,
"best_odd": 1.51,
"edge": -0.0274,
"ev": -0.1153,
"implied_prob": 0.6133,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.5859
},
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under": {
"alpha": 0.1518,
"best_odd": 2.395,
"edge": 0.0199,
"ev": -0.0262,
"implied_prob": 0.3867,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.4066
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 11,
"ou_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"p_final_over": 0.5859,
"p_final_under": 0.4066,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"reliability": "medium"
}
},
"match_regime": {
"action": "avoid",
"code": "no_edge",
"execution_line_key": "pred_regime_exec_no_actionable",
"insight_line_key": "pred_regime_insight_minor_inefficiency",
"stake_mult": 0.0,
"use_split_strip": true
},
"match_tier": "no_bet",
"min_ev": 0.02,
"total_xg": 2.6,
"variance_flag": false
},
"unified_decision": {
"actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
"algorithm": {
"enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
"game_typing_module": true,
"version": "2.5.0"
},
"balanced_alternative": null,
"best_consensus_ev": 0.3261,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.3261,
"best_tracked_ev": 0.3261,
"confidence": 6.5,
"decision_confidence_v1": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_v1_primary_line",
"pred_conf_v1_primary_ev_above_10",
"pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_v1_multi_ev_lines"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Primary line identified (+1.0)",
"Primary EV above 10% (+1.0)",
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)",
"Two or more valid +EV lines at threshold (+0.5)"
],
"breakdown_v2": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 3.0,
"score_v1_legacy": 6.5,
"score_v2_pre_penalty": 4.5,
"strength_v2": true
},
"decision_strength_v2": {
"breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 3.0,
"score_pre_penalty": 4.5
},
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution": {
"1x2_dominant": false,
"1x2_open_contest": true,
"grade": "A",
"stake_factor": 1.0
},
"favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
"active": false,
"gap": null,
"side": null
},
"final_action": "no_bet",
"final_decision": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 8.5,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 8.5,
"summary": "The market has moved toward Al Wakrah, but the model still strongly favours Al Shamal."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.3261,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.3261,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 4.5,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 32,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Al Shamal at 35.2%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 43.7%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Al Shamal as the value side (35.2%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 8.5,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved toward Al Wakrah, but the model still strongly favours Al Shamal.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Al Shamal",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +32.6% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +32.6% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +32.6% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "73 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "32 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+32.6% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 6,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved toward Al Wakrah, but the model still strongly favours Al Shamal.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 73,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved toward Al Wakrah, but the model still strongly favours Al Shamal.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1209,
"consensus_ev_display": "-12.1%",
"consensus_odds": 2.18,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.4366,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3518,
"raw_edge_display": "-8.5 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -8.5,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.4587155963302752,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2331,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-23.3%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -3.7,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.0 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.0
}
}
},
"game_type": {
"label_zh": "\u5747\u8861\uff08\u5f00\u653e\u8d5b\u679c\uff09",
"scoring_type": "balanced",
"signals": {
"btts_yes_prob": 0.545,
"draw_prob": 0.2965,
"max_1x2_prob": 0.3518,
"over_prob": 0.482,
"total_xg": 2.6,
"under_prob": 0.518,
"xg_diff": 0.0
},
"type": "balanced",
"typing_weights_enabled": true
},
"hero_display_pick": null,
"hero_mode": "default",
"longshot_picks": [],
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"consensus_odds": 2.18,
"decision": "no_bet",
"edge": -0.0333,
"ev": -0.1209,
"implied_prob": 0.4366,
"max_ev_side": "draw",
"model_prob": 0.3518,
"side": "home",
"side_label": "Al Shamal"
},
"btts": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.1629,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.535,
"edge": 0.015,
"market_prob": 0.3631,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.455,
"n_bookmakers": 11,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.1629,
"best_odd": 2.535,
"edge": 0.015,
"ev": -0.0417,
"implied_prob": 0.3631,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.378
},
"p_final": 0.378,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0417,
"value_side": "no",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.224,
"best_odd": 1.445,
"edge": -0.0206,
"ev": -0.1094,
"implied_prob": 0.6369,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.6163
}
},
"edge": 0.0884,
"ev": 0.2285,
"implied_prob": 0.3666,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"side": "no",
"value_side": "no"
},
"ou_2_5": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.1518,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.395,
"edge": 0.0199,
"market_prob": 0.3867,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.518,
"n_bookmakers": 11,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2087,
"best_odd": 1.51,
"edge": -0.0274,
"ev": -0.1153,
"implied_prob": 0.6133,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.5859
},
"p_final": 0.4066,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0262,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.1518,
"best_odd": 2.395,
"edge": 0.0199,
"ev": -0.0262,
"implied_prob": 0.3867,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.4066
},
"value_side": "under"
},
"edge": 0.1321,
"ev": 0.3261,
"implied_prob": 0.3859,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"side": "under",
"value_side": "under"
}
},
"match_id": 1597931,
"match_regime": {
"action": "bet",
"actionable": true,
"clear_edge": true,
"code": "clear_edge",
"execution_line_key": null,
"insight_line_key": null,
"max_valid_ev": 0.3261,
"min_ev": 0.02,
"stake_mult": 1.0,
"use_split_strip": false
},
"match_tier": "value_game",
"no_clear_primary": false,
"probabilities": {
"away": 0.3518,
"draw": 0.2965,
"home": 0.3518
},
"reason_codes": [
"no_ev_1x2"
],
"secondary_pick": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.2285,
"implied_prob": 0.3666,
"market": "btts",
"model_prob": 0.455,
"not_dominant": true,
"risk_band": "medium",
"risk_tier": "secondary",
"side": "no",
"slot": "secondary"
},
"secondary_picks": [
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.2285,
"implied_prob": 0.3666,
"market": "btts",
"model_prob": 0.455,
"not_dominant": true,
"risk_band": "medium",
"risk_tier": "secondary",
"side": "no",
"slot": "secondary"
}
],
"show_betting_primary_label": false,
"suppressed_primary": null,
"teams": {
"away": "Al Wakrah",
"home": "Al Shamal"
},
"top_pick": {
"composite_score": 0.118244,
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.3261,
"implied_prob": 0.3859,
"market": "ou_2_5",
"model_prob": 0.518,
"not_dominant": false,
"primary_strength": "clear",
"risk_band": "strong",
"risk_tier": "primary",
"side": "under",
"slot": "primary",
"speculative_primary": false
},
"valid_markets_count": 2,
"value_context_1x2": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1209,
"consensus_ev_display": "-12.1%",
"consensus_odds": 2.18,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.4366,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3518,
"raw_edge_display": "-8.5 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -8.5,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.4587155963302752,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2331,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-23.3%"
}
}
},
"fixture_id": 1597931,
"generated_at_utc": "2026-09-10T13:59:50.857307+00:00",
"lang_id": "en"
}
Explora Más Contenido de Predicciones
Obtén predicciones premium para Al Shamal & Al Wakrah!
Desbloquea análisis en profundidad, consejos de apuestas exclusivos y pronósticos de partidos con nuestro servicio de suscripción premium.
Suscríbete ahora
Liga de las Estrellas de Qatar — Clasificación
| # | EQUIPO | PJ | G | E | P | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Al Sadd | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
| 2 | Al-Rayyan SC | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 10 |
| 3 | Al Shamal | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 8 |
| 4 | Al-Arabi SC | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 6 |
| 5 | Al-Duhail SC | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 6 |
| 6 | Lusail City | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| 7 | Al Shahaniya | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| 8 | Al Ahli Doha | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| 9 | Al-Gharafa | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| 10 | Qatar SC | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 11 | Al Wakrah | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 12 | Al-Sailiya | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
| # | EQUIPO | PJ | GF | GC | +/- | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Al Sadd | 4 | 19 | 7 | +12 | 12 |
| 2 | Al Shamal | 4 | 10 | 6 | +4 | 8 |
| 3 | Al-Rayyan SC | 4 | 7 | 2 | +5 | 10 |
| 4 | Lusail City | 4 | 7 | 4 | +3 | 5 |
| 5 | Al Shahaniya | 4 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 4 |
| 6 | Al-Arabi SC | 4 | 5 | 3 | +2 | 6 |
| 7 | Al-Duhail SC | 4 | 5 | 3 | +2 | 6 |
| 8 | Al Ahli Doha | 4 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 4 |
| 9 | Al-Sailiya | 4 | 5 | 13 | -8 | 0 |
| 10 | Al-Gharafa | 4 | 4 | 8 | -4 | 4 |
| 11 | Qatar SC | 4 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 2 |
| 12 | Al Wakrah | 4 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 2 |
