Prediction Audit: Avro vs Workington Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Aug 19, 2026 - 18:45
4 1.30
1 1.30
xG Accuracy: 44%

AI correctly predicted the Avro win.

The match finished 4–1, validating the model's directional assessment.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Prediction grade B-

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (5 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 Avro Avro ✔ Correct
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 4-1 ✖ Incorrect

Model vs Closing Market

Strong Disagreement

The closing market prices Avro higher than the statistical model.

Largest probability gap: Avro -22.4 pp

Outcome Model Closing Market Difference Signal
Avro 35.2% 57.6% -22.4 pp Market Higher
Draw 29.6% 20.9% +8.8 pp Model Higher
Workington 35.2% 21.6% +13.6 pp Model Edge

The closing market estimates Avro's win probability at 57.6%, compared with the model's estimate of 35.2%, a difference of 22.4 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.

After full time, the model's directional lean matched the result (Avro win 4–1).

Post Match Insights

What worked

  • Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.60) — 5 goals materialised
  • Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result

What failed

  • Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (5 goals)
  • Exact score: outside the model's top score bins

Market lesson

Large model–market gaps do not automatically mean the market is right. Here the closing market priced Avro higher (57.6% vs model 35.2%, 22.4 pp), but the model's lean was validated (Avro win 4–1).

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Prediction Timeline

How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.

  1. Aug 19, 2026 · 18:44 UTC Forecast generated
    • Model 1X2 · Avro 35.2% · Draw 29.6% · Workington 35.2%
    • xG · Avro 1.30 — Workington 1.30
  2. Aug 19, 2026 · 18:14 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
    • 1X2 odds · Avro 1.57 · Draw 4.33 · Workington 4.19
    • Implied 1X2 · Avro 57.6% · Draw 20.9% · Workington 21.6%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  3. Aug 19, 2026 · 18:44 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
    • 1X2 odds · Avro 1.57 · Draw 4.33 · Workington 4.19
    • Implied 1X2 · Avro 57.6% · Draw 20.9% · Workington 21.6%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  4. Aug 19, 2026 · 18:45 UTC Kickoff
  5. FT Full-time result Avro win · 4–1
  6. FT Prediction validated Directional lean matched full-time result
  7. Archived Prediction review

Historical Snapshot

Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.

Historical verdict: Cautious / Wait

Historical label: Originally displayed as "Wait for validation".

Historical Decision Wait
Outcome Validated
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
Prediction Reliability 52/100 · Moderate
  • Validation: Warning
  • Large market gap (22 pp)
Evidence ★★★★★
  • No strong statistical edge
  • Pricing remains divergent
  • Validation warning
Pricing proximity (inverse gap) 0/100
Betting Confidence 33/100

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Aug 13, 2026 · 02:14 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-3821836

Closing Odds 1.57
AI Fair Odds —
CLV Pending
Final Result Avro win · Avro 4–1 Workington
Prediction ✔ Correct
Decision Grade B-

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Review FAQ

How accurate was the prediction?
This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
What does xG Accuracy measure?
xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
Does this improve the AI record?
Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Quick read on how the model reads this matchup.

  • League: Non League Premier - Northern
  • Fixture: Avro vs Workington
  • Kickoff: 2026-08-19 18:45:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 35.2% · Draw 29.6% · Away 35.2%
  • xG (showing): Avro 1.3 — Workington 1.3 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Value headline: None — no positive EV on tracked lines at current best prices (same as the decision block: no default bet).
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 51.8% · Over 2.5 48.2%); BTTS Yes (Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS Yes
  • BTTS (model): Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.6%)

Saying “no value” on a snapshot is a feature, not a bug: it protects readers from forcing a play when the edge is not there.

If lines move materially, re-run generation or refresh — implied probabilities and any future EV readouts will change first.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Wait

Outcome: Validated — Pre-match lean validated against the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 28, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Avro & Workington!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Predictions
Non League Premier - Northern Non League Premier - Northern — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Cleethorpes Town 10 7 2 1 23
2 Avro 9 7 1 1 22
3 Redcar Athletic 10 6 4 0 22
4 Guiseley AFC 9 6 1 2 19
5 Warrington Town 9 5 2 2 17
6 Bury 9 5 1 3 16
7 Curzon Ashton 9 5 1 3 16
8 Workington 9 5 1 3 16
9 Gainsborough Trinity 9 4 1 4 13
10 Rylands 9 4 1 4 13
11 Alfreton Town 9 4 0 5 12
12 Whitby Town 9 4 0 5 12
13 Ashton United 9 3 2 4 11
14 Hyde United 10 3 2 5 11
15 AFC Emley 9 2 4 3 10
16 Lancaster City 9 3 1 5 10
17 Leek Town 10 2 3 5 9
18 Bamber Bridge 10 2 3 5 9
19 Stockton Town 10 2 2 6 8
20 Ilkeston Town 9 2 1 6 7
21 Quorn 9 1 3 5 6
22 United of Manchester 9 1 2 6 5
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Avro 9 28 16 +12 22
2 Cleethorpes Town 10 25 6 +19 23
3 Guiseley AFC 9 22 10 +12 19
4 Redcar Athletic 10 19 7 +12 22
5 Bury 9 19 8 +11 16
6 Leek Town 10 19 20 -1 9
7 Curzon Ashton 9 18 10 +8 16
8 Warrington Town 9 18 14 +4 17
9 Workington 9 17 15 +2 16
10 Alfreton Town 9 15 10 +5 12
11 Gainsborough Trinity 9 14 12 +2 13
12 Whitby Town 9 14 24 -10 12
13 Bamber Bridge 10 14 27 -13 9
14 Stockton Town 10 13 20 -7 8
15 Rylands 9 12 13 -1 13
16 United of Manchester 9 12 19 -7 5
17 Quorn 9 12 23 -11 6
18 Hyde United 10 11 19 -8 11
19 Ashton United 9 10 9 +1 11
20 Lancaster City 9 9 17 -8 10
21 AFC Emley 9 8 15 -7 10
22 Ilkeston Town 9 6 21 -15 7