AI correctly predicted the Sport Boys win.
The match finished 5–1, validating the model's directional assessment.
Tracked markets vs full-time result
Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.
- Market Prediction Result Outcome
- Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (6 goals) ✖ Incorrect
- Both Teams To Score BTTS No Yes ✖ Incorrect
- 1X2 Sport Boys Sport Boys ✔ Correct
- Correct Score Insights 1-0, 1-1, 2-0, 0-0, 2-1 5-1 ✖ Incorrect
Model vs Closing Market
| Outcome | Model | Closing Market | Difference | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sport Boys | 50.9% | 43.4% | +7.5 pp | Model Higher |
| Draw | 29.0% | 29.0% | +0.0 pp | Aligned |
| Cienciano | 20.1% | 27.6% | -7.5 pp | Market Higher |
The statistical model estimates Sport Boys's win probability at 50.9%, compared with the closing market's implied probability of 43.4%, a difference of 7.5 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model's assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
After full time, the model's directional lean matched the result (Sport Boys win 5–1).
Market Assessment
The fair estimate shows a modest edge over current market pricing on Sport Boys.
- Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Sport Boys attacking xG significantly stronger (1.55 vs 0.78)
What failed
- Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS No; match finished BTTS Yes
- Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (6 goals)
Market lesson
Large model–market gaps do not automatically mean the market is right. Here the closing market priced Sport Boys more conservatively (43.4% vs model 50.9%, 7.5 pp), but the model's lean was validated (Sport Boys win 5–1).
Prediction Timeline
How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.
-
Aug 23, 2026 · 19:38 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Sport Boys 51.0% · Draw 29.0% · Cienciano 20.1%
- xG · Sport Boys 1.55 — Cienciano 0.78
-
Aug 23, 2026 · 17:30 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Sport Boys 2.17 · Draw 3.20 · Cienciano 3.28
- Implied 1X2 · Sport Boys 42.7% · Draw 29.0% · Cienciano 28.3%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Aug 23, 2026 · 17:59 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Sport Boys 2.14 · Draw 3.20 · Cienciano 3.36
- Implied 1X2 · Sport Boys 43.4% · Draw 29.0% · Cienciano 27.6%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Aug 23, 2026 · 18:00 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Sport Boys win · 5–1
-
FT Prediction validated Directional lean matched full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Historical Snapshot
Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
- Validation: Pass
- Moderate model lean
- Direction agrees with model lean
- Validation passed
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Review FAQ
- How accurate was the prediction?
- This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
- What does xG Accuracy measure?
- xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
- Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
- Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
- Does this improve the AI record?
- Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore More Predictions Content
Get Premium Predictions for Sport Boys & Cienciano!
Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.
Subscribe Now
Primera División — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alianza Lima | 27 | 16 | 8 | 3 | 56 |
| 2 | Universitario | 27 | 14 | 7 | 6 | 49 |
| 3 | Deportivo Garcilaso | 27 | 14 | 6 | 7 | 48 |
| 4 | FBC Melgar | 27 | 13 | 7 | 7 | 46 |
| 5 | Cusco | 27 | 14 | 3 | 10 | 45 |
| 6 | Cultural Santa Rosa | 26 | 12 | 5 | 9 | 41 |
| 7 | Cienciano | 26 | 12 | 4 | 10 | 40 |
| 8 | Alianza Atletico | 27 | 11 | 7 | 9 | 40 |
| 9 | Sporting Cristal | 27 | 11 | 5 | 11 | 38 |
| 10 | Sport Boys | 27 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 38 |
| 11 | Sport Huancayo | 27 | 10 | 5 | 12 | 35 |
| 12 | Juan Pablo II College | 27 | 9 | 7 | 11 | 34 |
| 13 | Atletico Grau | 27 | 9 | 5 | 13 | 32 |
| 14 | Comerciantes Unidos | 27 | 7 | 9 | 11 | 30 |
| 15 | FC Cajamarca | 27 | 7 | 6 | 14 | 27 |
| 16 | ADT | 27 | 6 | 7 | 14 | 25 |
| 17 | UCV Moquegua | 27 | 6 | 7 | 14 | 25 |
| 18 | UTC | 27 | 4 | 8 | 15 | 15 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sporting Cristal | 27 | 48 | 40 | +8 | 38 |
| 2 | FBC Melgar | 27 | 45 | 29 | +16 | 46 |
| 3 | Cienciano | 26 | 45 | 39 | +6 | 40 |
| 4 | Alianza Lima | 27 | 44 | 18 | +26 | 56 |
| 5 | Universitario | 27 | 43 | 31 | +12 | 49 |
| 6 | Juan Pablo II College | 27 | 42 | 52 | -10 | 34 |
| 7 | FC Cajamarca | 27 | 41 | 52 | -11 | 27 |
| 8 | Alianza Atletico | 27 | 40 | 35 | +5 | 40 |
| 9 | Cusco | 27 | 40 | 38 | +2 | 45 |
| 10 | Deportivo Garcilaso | 27 | 39 | 24 | +15 | 48 |
| 11 | Sport Huancayo | 27 | 37 | 44 | -7 | 35 |
| 12 | Comerciantes Unidos | 27 | 35 | 38 | -3 | 30 |
| 13 | Cultural Santa Rosa | 26 | 35 | 44 | -9 | 41 |
| 14 | UTC | 27 | 32 | 50 | -18 | 15 |
| 15 | Sport Boys | 27 | 29 | 26 | +3 | 38 |
| 16 | ADT | 27 | 29 | 42 | -13 | 25 |
| 17 | Atletico Grau | 27 | 26 | 31 | -5 | 32 |
| 18 | UCV Moquegua | 27 | 24 | 41 | -17 | 25 |
| # | TEAM | MP | xG | xGC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alianza Lima | 27 | 2.3 | 0.0 | +2.3 | 56 |
| 2 | Deportivo Garcilaso | 27 | 2.3 | 1.4 | +0.9 | 48 |
| 3 | Cusco | 27 | 1.4 | 2.3 | -0.9 | 45 |
| 4 | UTC | 27 | 0.0 | 2.3 | -2.3 | 15 |
| 5 | Universitario | 27 | — | — | — | 49 |
| 6 | FBC Melgar | 27 | — | — | — | 46 |
| 7 | Cultural Santa Rosa | 26 | — | — | — | 41 |
| 8 | Cienciano | 26 | — | — | — | 40 |
| 9 | Alianza Atletico | 27 | — | — | — | 40 |
| 10 | Sporting Cristal | 27 | — | — | — | 38 |
| 11 | Sport Boys | 27 | — | — | — | 38 |
| 12 | Sport Huancayo | 27 | — | — | — | 35 |
| 13 | Juan Pablo II College | 27 | — | — | — | 34 |
| 14 | Atletico Grau | 27 | — | — | — | 32 |
| 15 | Comerciantes Unidos | 27 | — | — | — | 30 |
| 16 | FC Cajamarca | 27 | — | — | — | 27 |
| 17 | ADT | 27 | — | — | — | 25 |
| 18 | UCV Moquegua | 27 | — | — | — | 25 |