The model missed the final outcome (Chicago Red Stars W win 3–2).
The model had projected Racing Louisville W at 43.1%, but the full-time result went the other way.
Tracked markets vs full-time result
Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.
- Market Prediction Result Outcome
- Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Over 2.5 (5 goals) ✔ Correct
- Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
- 1X2 Racing Louisville W Chicago Red Stars W ✖ Incorrect
- Correct Score Insights 1-2, 2-2, 1-1, 2-1, 1-3 3-2 ✖ Incorrect
Model vs Closing Market
| Outcome | Model | Closing Market | Difference | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chicago Red Stars W | 34.1% | 23.9% | +10.2 pp | Model Edge |
| Draw | 22.8% | 23.4% | -0.6 pp | Aligned |
| Racing Louisville W | 43.1% | 52.7% | -9.6 pp | Market Higher |
The statistical model estimates Chicago Red Stars W's win probability at 34.1%, compared with the closing market's implied probability of 23.9%, a difference of 10.2 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model's assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
After full time, the result was Chicago Red Stars W win 3–2.
Market Assessment
The statistical fair estimate is materially higher than the market on Chicago Red Stars W.
- The model may see a slower-scoring or closer matchup than the market.
- Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 4.02) — 5 goals materialised
- Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
- Over 2.5 goals aligned with the xG profile
What failed
- 1X2: model leaned Racing Louisville W; match finished Chicago Red Stars W
- Exact score: outside the model's top score bins
Market lesson
The closing market differed from the model on Racing Louisville W by 10.2 percentage points (32.9% vs model 43.1%) — in this case the market view proved closer.
Prediction Timeline
How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.
-
Aug 23, 2026 · 19:38 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Chicago Red Stars W 34.1% · Draw 22.8% · Racing Louisville W 43.1%
- xG · Chicago Red Stars W 1.94 — Racing Louisville W 2.08
-
Aug 23, 2026 · 17:29 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Chicago Red Stars W 3.88 · Draw 3.96 · Racing Louisville W 1.76
- Implied 1X2 · Chicago Red Stars W 23.9% · Draw 23.4% · Racing Louisville W 52.7%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Aug 23, 2026 · 17:59 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Chicago Red Stars W 3.88 · Draw 3.96 · Racing Louisville W 1.76
- Implied 1X2 · Chicago Red Stars W 23.9% · Draw 23.4% · Racing Louisville W 52.7%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Aug 23, 2026 · 18:00 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Chicago Red Stars W win · 3–2
-
FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Historical Snapshot
Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
- Validation: Warning
- Large market gap (10 pp)
- High xG deviation from league baseline (54%+)
- Statistical edge detected
- Market has already priced much of the edge
- Validation warning
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Review FAQ
- How accurate was the prediction?
- This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
- What does xG Accuracy measure?
- xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
- Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
- Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
- Does this improve the AI record?
- Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore More Predictions Content
Get Premium Predictions for Chicago Red Stars W & Racing Louisville W!
Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.
Subscribe Now
NWSL Women — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NJ/NY Gotham FC W | 26 | 16 | 6 | 4 | 54 |
| 2 | San Diego Wave W | 26 | 15 | 3 | 8 | 48 |
| 3 | Washington Spirit W | 26 | 14 | 4 | 8 | 46 |
| 4 | Angel City W | 26 | 12 | 6 | 8 | 42 |
| 5 | Utah Royals W | 25 | 13 | 3 | 9 | 42 |
| 6 | Portland Thorns W | 25 | 12 | 6 | 7 | 42 |
| 7 | Kansas City W | 26 | 12 | 5 | 9 | 41 |
| 8 | Seattle Reign FC | 26 | 12 | 4 | 10 | 40 |
| 9 | North Carolina Courage W | 25 | 12 | 3 | 10 | 39 |
| 10 | Denver Summit W | 26 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 35 |
| 11 | Orlando Pride W | 25 | 9 | 3 | 13 | 30 |
| 12 | Houston Dash W | 25 | 8 | 5 | 12 | 29 |
| 13 | Bay FC | 25 | 7 | 5 | 13 | 26 |
| 14 | Boston Legacy W | 26 | 7 | 5 | 14 | 26 |
| 15 | Racing Louisville W | 26 | 7 | 2 | 17 | 23 |
| 16 | Chicago Red Stars W | 26 | 5 | 2 | 19 | 17 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | North Carolina Courage W | 25 | 48 | 37 | +11 | 39 |
| 2 | Angel City W | 26 | 44 | 28 | +16 | 42 |
| 3 | Kansas City W | 26 | 43 | 37 | +6 | 41 |
| 4 | Portland Thorns W | 25 | 42 | 34 | +8 | 42 |
| 5 | Denver Summit W | 26 | 42 | 37 | +5 | 35 |
| 6 | Utah Royals W | 25 | 41 | 33 | +8 | 42 |
| 7 | San Diego Wave W | 26 | 38 | 27 | +11 | 48 |
| 8 | Washington Spirit W | 26 | 36 | 24 | +12 | 46 |
| 9 | Racing Louisville W | 26 | 35 | 51 | -16 | 23 |
| 10 | NJ/NY Gotham FC W | 26 | 34 | 20 | +14 | 54 |
| 11 | Seattle Reign FC | 26 | 33 | 31 | +2 | 40 |
| 12 | Orlando Pride W | 25 | 32 | 40 | -8 | 30 |
| 13 | Boston Legacy W | 26 | 32 | 44 | -12 | 26 |
| 14 | Houston Dash W | 25 | 31 | 35 | -4 | 29 |
| 15 | Bay FC | 25 | 26 | 34 | -8 | 26 |
| 16 | Chicago Red Stars W | 26 | 15 | 60 | -45 | 17 |
| # | TEAM | MP | xG | xGC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | San Diego Wave W | 26 | 7.6 | 4.5 | +3.1 | 48 |
| 2 | Denver Summit W | 26 | 3.9 | 1.9 | +2.0 | 35 |
| 3 | Bay FC | 25 | 3.1 | 1.4 | +1.7 | 26 |
| 4 | Orlando Pride W | 25 | 4.6 | 3.5 | +1.1 | 30 |
| 5 | North Carolina Courage W | 25 | 2.3 | 1.2 | +1.1 | 39 |
| 6 | Boston Legacy W | 26 | 3.9 | 2.9 | +1.0 | 26 |
| 7 | Seattle Reign FC | 26 | 3.2 | 2.3 | +0.9 | 40 |
| 8 | Utah Royals W | 25 | 1.5 | 1.9 | -0.4 | 42 |
| 9 | Kansas City W | 26 | 3.7 | 4.2 | -0.5 | 41 |
| 10 | Washington Spirit W | 26 | 1.2 | 2.3 | -1.1 | 46 |
| 11 | Angel City W | 26 | 1.7 | 3.0 | -1.3 | 42 |
| 12 | Portland Thorns W | 25 | 3.0 | 4.5 | -1.5 | 42 |
| 13 | Racing Louisville W | 26 | 1.4 | 3.1 | -1.7 | 23 |
| 14 | Houston Dash W | 25 | 1.9 | 3.9 | -2.0 | 29 |
| 15 | Chicago Red Stars W | 26 | 1.2 | 3.5 | -2.3 | 17 |
| 16 | NJ/NY Gotham FC W | 26 | — | — | — | 54 |