The model missed the final outcome (Levadia U19 win 1–0).
The model had projected Narva U21 at 38.5%, but the full-time result went the other way.
Tracked markets vs full-time result
Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.
- Market Prediction Result Outcome
- Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (1 goals) ✔ Correct
- Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
- 1X2 Narva U21 Levadia U19 ✖ Incorrect
- Correct Score Insights 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 1-0 ✔ Correct
Model vs Closing Market
| Outcome | Model | Closing Market | Difference | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Levadia U19 | 31.9% | 31.9% | +0.1 pp | Aligned |
| Draw | 29.6% | 22.1% | +7.5 pp | Model Higher |
| Narva U21 | 38.5% | 46.1% | -7.6 pp | Market Higher |
The closing market estimates Narva U21's win probability at 46.1%, compared with the model's estimate of 38.5%, a difference of 7.6 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
After full time, the result was Levadia U19 win 1–0.
Market Assessment
The market and model broadly agree on Narva U21. The remaining divergence may reflect differences in team-strength assumptions rather than a directional disagreement.
- Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Under 2.5 goals aligned with the xG profile
- Exact score 1–0 fell within the model's highlighted bins
What failed
- Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS Yes; match finished BTTS No
- 1X2: model leaned Narva U21; match finished Levadia U19
Market lesson
The closing market differed from the model on Narva U21 by 7.6 percentage points (46.1% vs model 38.5%) — in this case the market view proved closer.
Prediction Timeline
How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.
-
Aug 19, 2026 · 15:59 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Levadia U19 31.9% · Draw 29.6% · Narva U21 38.5%
- xG · Levadia U19 1.23 — Narva U21 1.37
-
Aug 19, 2026 · 15:29 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Levadia U19 2.79 · Draw 4.03 · Narva U21 1.93
- Implied 1X2 · Levadia U19 31.9% · Draw 22.1% · Narva U21 46.1%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Aug 19, 2026 · 15:59 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Levadia U19 2.79 · Draw 4.03 · Narva U21 1.93
- Implied 1X2 · Levadia U19 31.9% · Draw 22.1% · Narva U21 46.1%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Aug 19, 2026 · 16:00 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Levadia U19 win · 1–0
-
FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Historical Snapshot
Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
- Validation: Pass
- No strong statistical edge
- Direction agrees with model lean
- Validation passed
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Review FAQ
- How accurate was the prediction?
- This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
- What does xG Accuracy measure?
- xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
- Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
- Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
- Does this improve the AI record?
- Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore More Predictions Content
Get Premium Predictions for Levadia U19 & Narva U21!
Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.
Subscribe Now
Esiliiga B — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Narva U21 | 30 | 20 | 3 | 7 | 63 |
| 2 | Levadia U19 | 30 | 18 | 2 | 10 | 56 |
| 3 | Phoenix | 30 | 17 | 3 | 10 | 54 |
| 4 | Tulevik | 30 | 14 | 5 | 11 | 47 |
| 4 | Johvi Phoenix | 19 | 11 | 1 | 7 | 34 |
| 5 | Tartu Kalev | 30 | 15 | 2 | 13 | 47 |
| 6 | Luunja | 30 | 14 | 5 | 11 | 47 |
| 7 | Parnu JK Vaprus U21 | 30 | 14 | 4 | 12 | 46 |
| 8 | JK Tabasalu | 30 | 10 | 3 | 17 | 33 |
| 9 | Tallinna Kalev II | 30 | 7 | 5 | 18 | 26 |
| 10 | Legion | 30 | 3 | 4 | 23 | 13 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Parnu JK Vaprus U21 | 30 | 95 | 62 | +33 | 46 |
| 2 | Tulevik | 30 | 80 | 61 | +19 | 47 |
| 3 | Levadia U19 | 30 | 75 | 52 | +23 | 56 |
| 4 | Luunja | 30 | 74 | 63 | +11 | 47 |
| 5 | Tartu Kalev | 30 | 72 | 58 | +14 | 47 |
| 6 | Narva U21 | 30 | 71 | 36 | +35 | 63 |
| 7 | Phoenix | 30 | 71 | 68 | +3 | 54 |
| 8 | Tallinna Kalev II | 30 | 60 | 77 | -17 | 26 |
| 9 | Johvi Phoenix | 19 | 49 | 47 | +2 | 34 |
| 10 | JK Tabasalu | 30 | 44 | 81 | -37 | 33 |
| 11 | Legion | 30 | 29 | 113 | -84 | 13 |