AI correctly predicted the Chaco win.
The match finished 6–1, validating the model's directional assessment.
Tracked markets vs full-time result
Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.
- Market Prediction Result Outcome
- Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (7 goals) ✖ Incorrect
- Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
- 1X2 Chaco Chaco ✔ Correct
- Correct Score Insights 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 6-1 ✖ Incorrect
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.60) — 7 goals materialised
- Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
What failed
- Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (7 goals)
- Exact score: outside the model's top score bins
Market lesson
The model's directional lean matched the full-time result (Chaco win 6–1).
Prediction Timeline
How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.
-
Sep 25, 2026 · 00:42 UTC Forecast generated
- xG · Chaco 1.30 — Ingenieros 1.30
-
Sep 27, 2026 · 19:00 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Chaco win · 6–1
-
FT Prediction validated Directional lean matched full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Historical Snapshot
Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
- Validation: Pending
- No strong statistical edge
- Market has already priced much of the edge
- Validation pending
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Review FAQ
- How accurate was the prediction?
- This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
- What does xG Accuracy measure?
- xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
- Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
- Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
- Does this improve the AI record?
- Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore More Predictions Content
Get Premium Predictions for Chaco & Ingenieros!
Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.
Subscribe Now
Nacional B — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | EM Huanuni | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 14 |
| 1 | 26 de Febrero | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 15 |
| 1 | Wilstermann Cooperativa | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 |
| 1 | Independiente CBBA | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 15 |
| 1 | Virginia | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 14 |
| 1 | CD IN San Juan FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| 1 | Primero Mayo | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 12 |
| 2 | Atletico Sucre | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 9 |
| 2 | Deportivo FATIC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 |
| 2 | Hiska Nacional | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| 2 | Mineros Potosi | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 |
| 2 | Municipal Tiquipaya | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 11 |
| 2 | Deportivo Tigres | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 |
| 2 | Ciudad Nueva Santa Cruz | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 11 |
| 3 | Club Universitario | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 |
| 4 | Ingenieros | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| 4 | Atletico Juniors | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 |
| 4 | Universitario Beni | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
| 4 | Unión Tarija | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| 4 | CD Guadalajara | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
| 4 | Universitario Tarija | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 |
| 4 | Libertad | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 1 |
| 5 | Chaco | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| 6 | San Martin de Yacuiba | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mineros Potosi | 6 | 20 | 8 | +12 | 10 |
| 2 | Municipal Tiquipaya | 6 | 15 | 4 | +11 | 11 |
| 3 | Atletico Sucre | 6 | 15 | 8 | +7 | 9 |
| 4 | Wilstermann Cooperativa | 6 | 15 | 12 | +3 | 10 |
| 5 | 26 de Febrero | 6 | 14 | 6 | +8 | 15 |
| 6 | EM Huanuni | 6 | 13 | 4 | +9 | 14 |
| 7 | Deportivo FATIC | 6 | 13 | 7 | +6 | 10 |
| 8 | Chaco | 5 | 13 | 14 | -1 | 6 |
| 9 | Independiente CBBA | 6 | 12 | 6 | +6 | 15 |
| 10 | CD IN San Juan FC | 5 | 11 | 4 | +7 | 10 |
| 11 | Primero Mayo | 6 | 11 | 10 | +1 | 12 |
| 12 | Virginia | 6 | 10 | 3 | +7 | 14 |
| 13 | Ciudad Nueva Santa Cruz | 6 | 10 | 7 | +3 | 11 |
| 14 | Hiska Nacional | 6 | 10 | 15 | -5 | 7 |
| 15 | Deportivo Tigres | 5 | 9 | 4 | +5 | 8 |
| 16 | Ingenieros | 5 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 4 |
| 17 | Club Universitario | 6 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| 18 | Unión Tarija | 5 | 7 | 6 | +1 | 6 |
| 19 | Universitario Tarija | 6 | 5 | 17 | -12 | 4 |
| 20 | Atletico Juniors | 6 | 5 | 26 | -21 | 0 |
| 21 | CD Guadalajara | 5 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 2 |
| 22 | San Martin de Yacuiba | 5 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 6 |
| 23 | Universitario Beni | 5 | 2 | 15 | -13 | 0 |
| 24 | Libertad | 6 | 0 | 22 | -22 | 1 |