AI correctly predicted the Phu Dong win.
The match finished 2–1, validating the model's directional assessment.
Tracked markets vs full-time result
Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.
- Market Prediction Result Outcome
- Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (3 goals) ✖ Incorrect
- Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
- 1X2 Phu Dong Phu Dong ✔ Correct
- Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 2-1 ✔ Correct
Model vs Closing Market
| Outcome | Model | Closing Market | Difference | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phu Dong | 37.5% | 68.4% | -30.9 pp | Market Higher |
| Draw | 29.6% | 19.8% | +9.8 pp | Model Higher |
| Thanh Hóa | 32.9% | 11.8% | +21.0 pp | Model Edge |
The closing market estimates Phu Dong's win probability at 68.4%, compared with the model's estimate of 37.5%, a difference of 30.9 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
After full time, the model's directional lean matched the result (Phu Dong win 2–1).
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.60) — 3 goals materialised
- Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
- Exact score 2–1 fell within the model's highlighted bins
What failed
- Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (3 goals)
Market lesson
Large model–market gaps do not automatically mean the market is right. Here the closing market priced Phu Dong higher (68.3% vs model 37.5%, 30.9 pp), but the model's lean was validated (Phu Dong win 2–1).
Prediction Timeline
How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.
-
Sep 11, 2026 · 10:59 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Phu Dong 37.6% · Draw 29.6% · Thanh Hóa 32.9%
- xG · Phu Dong 1.35 — Thanh Hóa 1.25
-
Sep 11, 2026 · 10:29 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Phu Dong 1.30 · Draw 4.50 · Thanh Hóa 7.50
- Implied 1X2 · Phu Dong 68.4% · Draw 19.8% · Thanh Hóa 11.8%
- Bookmaker · Bet365
-
Sep 11, 2026 · 10:59 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Phu Dong 1.30 · Draw 4.50 · Thanh Hóa 7.50
- Implied 1X2 · Phu Dong 68.4% · Draw 19.8% · Thanh Hóa 11.8%
- Bookmaker · Bet365
-
Sep 11, 2026 · 11:00 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Phu Dong win · 2–1
-
FT Prediction validated Directional lean matched full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Historical Snapshot
Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.
Historical label: Originally displayed as "Wait for validation".
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
- Validation: Fail
- Large market gap (31 pp)
- No strong statistical edge
- Market strongly disagrees on price
- Validation failed
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Review FAQ
- How accurate was the prediction?
- This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
- What does xG Accuracy measure?
- xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
- Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
- Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
- Does this improve the AI record?
- Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore More Predictions Content
Get Premium Predictions for Phu Dong & Thanh Hóa!
Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.
Subscribe Now
V.League 1 — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Công An Nhân Dân | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9 |
| 2 | Phu Dong | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| 3 | Song Lam Nghe An | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| 4 | Da Nang | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 5 | Nam Dinh | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 6 | Ho Chi Minh City | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 7 | Viettel | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 8 | Thanh Hóa | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 9 | Bắc Ninh | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 10 | Hai Phong | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 11 | Hồng Lĩnh Hà Tĩnh | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| 12 | Ha Noi | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| 13 | Hoang Anh Gia Lai | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| 14 | Bình Phước | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Công An Nhân Dân | 3 | 6 | 0 | +6 | 9 |
| 2 | Phu Dong | 2 | 6 | 2 | +4 | 6 |
| 3 | Song Lam Nghe An | 2 | 5 | 1 | +4 | 6 |
| 4 | Da Nang | 2 | 5 | 3 | +2 | 3 |
| 5 | Nam Dinh | 2 | 4 | 3 | +1 | 3 |
| 6 | Thanh Hóa | 2 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 3 |
| 7 | Hai Phong | 2 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 3 |
| 8 | Ho Chi Minh City | 2 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 3 |
| 9 | Viettel | 2 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 3 |
| 10 | Ha Noi | 2 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 0 |
| 11 | Bắc Ninh | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| 12 | Hồng Lĩnh Hà Tĩnh | 2 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 3 |
| 13 | Hoang Anh Gia Lai | 2 | 1 | 7 | -6 | 0 |
| 14 | Bình Phước | 3 | 0 | 6 | -6 | 0 |
