The model missed the final outcome (CS Drobeta-Turnu Severin win 3–2).
The model had projected Vulturii Fărcăşeşti at 35.6%, but the full-time result went the other way.
Tracked markets vs full-time result
Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.
- Market Prediction Result Outcome
- Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (5 goals) ✖ Incorrect
- Both Teams To Score BTTS No Yes ✖ Incorrect
- 1X2 Vulturii Fărcăşeşti CS Drobeta-Turnu Severin ✖ Incorrect
- Correct Score Insights 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 3-2 ✖ Incorrect
Model vs Closing Market
| Outcome | Model | Closing Market | Difference | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CS Drobeta-Turnu Severin | 34.7% | 53.9% | -19.1 pp | Market Higher |
| Draw | 29.6% | 22.5% | +7.2 pp | Model Higher |
| Vulturii Fărcăşeşti | 35.6% | 23.7% | +12.0 pp | Model Edge |
The closing market estimates CS Drobeta-Turnu Severin's win probability at 53.9%, compared with the model's estimate of 34.7%, a difference of 19.1 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
After full time, the result was CS Drobeta-Turnu Severin win 3–2.
Market Assessment
The market is materially more optimistic about CS Drobeta-Turnu Severin than the current fair estimate.
- Investors may be incorporating information not fully reflected in the baseline model.
- Tournament-specific context can shift market pricing.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.60) — 5 goals materialised
What failed
- Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS No; match finished BTTS Yes
- Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (5 goals)
Market lesson
The closing market differed from the model on Vulturii Fărcăşeşti by 19.1 percentage points (54.8% vs model 35.6%) — in this case the market view proved closer.
Prediction Timeline
How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.
-
Sep 23, 2026 · 13:59 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · CS Drobeta-Turnu Severin 34.7% · Draw 29.7% · Vulturii Fărcăşeşti 35.6%
- xG · CS Drobeta-Turnu Severin 1.29 — Vulturii Fărcăşeşti 1.31
-
Sep 23, 2026 · 13:29 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · CS Drobeta-Turnu Severin 1.67 · Draw 4.00 · Vulturii Fărcăşeşti 3.80
- Implied 1X2 · CS Drobeta-Turnu Severin 53.9% · Draw 22.5% · Vulturii Fărcăşeşti 23.7%
- Bookmaker · Bet365
-
Sep 23, 2026 · 13:59 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · CS Drobeta-Turnu Severin 1.67 · Draw 4.00 · Vulturii Fărcăşeşti 3.80
- Implied 1X2 · CS Drobeta-Turnu Severin 53.9% · Draw 22.5% · Vulturii Fărcăşeşti 23.7%
- Bookmaker · Bet365
-
Sep 23, 2026 · 14:00 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result CS Drobeta-Turnu Severin win · 3–2
-
FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Historical Snapshot
Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
- Validation: Warning
- Large market gap (19 pp)
- No strong statistical edge
- Pricing remains divergent
- Validation warning
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Review FAQ
- How accurate was the prediction?
- This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
- What does xG Accuracy measure?
- xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
- Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
- Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
- Does this improve the AI record?
- Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore More Predictions Content
Get Premium Predictions for CS Drobeta-Turnu Severin & Vulturii Fărcăşeşti!
Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.
Subscribe Now
Liga III - Serie 6 — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CS Drobeta-Turnu Severin | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 |
| 2 | CS U Craiova II | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 12 |
| 3 | Minerul Lupeni | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 12 |
| 4 | Filiaşi | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 11 |
| 5 | CSM Targu Jiu | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 11 |
| 6 | Jiul Petroşani | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 |
| 7 | Unirea Bascov | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 |
| 8 | Vulturii Fărcăşeşti | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 |
| 9 | Oltul Curtişoara | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 6 |
| 10 | Păușești | 6 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 5 |
| 11 | Academica Balș | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3 |
| 12 | Petrolul Hartiesti | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CS U Craiova II | 6 | 13 | 7 | +6 | 12 |
| 2 | Filiaşi | 6 | 13 | 10 | +3 | 11 |
| 3 | CS Drobeta-Turnu Severin | 6 | 12 | 5 | +7 | 13 |
| 4 | Unirea Bascov | 6 | 11 | 8 | +3 | 8 |
| 5 | Vulturii Fărcăşeşti | 6 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 8 |
| 6 | Jiul Petroşani | 6 | 10 | 7 | +3 | 10 |
| 7 | CSM Targu Jiu | 6 | 9 | 6 | +3 | 11 |
| 8 | Oltul Curtişoara | 6 | 8 | 13 | -5 | 6 |
| 9 | Minerul Lupeni | 6 | 7 | 3 | +4 | 12 |
| 10 | Academica Balș | 6 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 3 |
| 11 | Păușești | 6 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 5 |
| 12 | Petrolul Hartiesti | 6 | 2 | 22 | -20 | 0 |
