The model missed the final outcome (Playford City Patriots win 3–0).
The model had projected White City Woodville at 37.5%, but the full-time result went the other way.
Tracked markets vs full-time result
Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.
- Market Prediction Result Outcome
- Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (3 goals) ✖ Incorrect
- Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
- 1X2 White City Woodville Playford City Patriots ✖ Incorrect
- Correct Score Insights 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 3-0 ✖ Incorrect
Model vs Closing Market
| Outcome | Model | Closing Market | Difference | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Playford City Patriots | 32.9% | 43.0% | -10.2 pp | Market Higher |
| Draw | 29.6% | 26.5% | +3.1 pp | Aligned |
| White City Woodville | 37.5% | 30.5% | +7.1 pp | Model Higher |
The closing market estimates Playford City Patriots's win probability at 43.0%, compared with the model's estimate of 32.9%, a difference of 10.2 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
After full time, the result was Playford City Patriots win 3–0.
Market Assessment
The market is materially more optimistic about Playford City Patriots than the current fair estimate.
- Investors may be incorporating information not fully reflected in the baseline model.
- Tournament-specific context can shift market pricing.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.60) — 3 goals materialised
What failed
- Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS Yes; match finished BTTS No
- Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (3 goals)
Market lesson
The closing market differed from the model on White City Woodville by 10.2 percentage points (47.7% vs model 37.5%) — in this case the market view proved closer.
Prediction Timeline
How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.
-
Aug 22, 2026 · 05:29 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Playford City Patriots 32.9% · Draw 29.6% · White City Woodville 37.6%
- xG · Playford City Patriots 1.25 — White City Woodville 1.35
-
Aug 22, 2026 · 04:59 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Playford City Patriots 2.13 · Draw 3.46 · White City Woodville 3.01
- Implied 1X2 · Playford City Patriots 43.0% · Draw 26.5% · White City Woodville 30.5%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Aug 22, 2026 · 05:29 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Playford City Patriots 2.13 · Draw 3.46 · White City Woodville 3.01
- Implied 1X2 · Playford City Patriots 43.0% · Draw 26.5% · White City Woodville 30.5%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Aug 22, 2026 · 05:30 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Playford City Patriots win · 3–0
-
FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Historical Snapshot
Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
- Validation: Warning
- Large market gap (10 pp)
- No strong statistical edge
- Market has already priced much of the edge
- Validation warning
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Review FAQ
- How accurate was the prediction?
- This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
- What does xG Accuracy measure?
- xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
- Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
- Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
- Does this improve the AI record?
- Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore More Predictions Content
Get Premium Predictions for Playford City Patriots & White City Woodville!
Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.
Subscribe Now
South Australia NPL — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Adelaide City | 22 | 14 | 6 | 2 | 48 |
| 2 | West Torrens Birkalla | 22 | 14 | 3 | 5 | 45 |
| 3 | MetroStars | 22 | 13 | 5 | 4 | 44 |
| 4 | Playford City Patriots | 22 | 10 | 5 | 7 | 35 |
| 5 | White City Woodville | 22 | 10 | 3 | 9 | 33 |
| 6 | Croydon Kings | 22 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 30 |
| 7 | Adelaide United II | 22 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 29 |
| 8 | Campbelltown City | 22 | 8 | 5 | 9 | 29 |
| 9 | Sturt Lions | 22 | 8 | 3 | 11 | 27 |
| 10 | West Adelaide | 22 | 6 | 7 | 9 | 25 |
| 11 | Adelaide Comets | 22 | 5 | 5 | 12 | 20 |
| 12 | Para Hills Knights | 22 | 0 | 2 | 20 | 2 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | West Torrens Birkalla | 22 | 54 | 29 | +25 | 45 |
| 2 | MetroStars | 22 | 53 | 23 | +30 | 44 |
| 3 | Croydon Kings | 22 | 46 | 41 | +5 | 30 |
| 4 | Adelaide City | 22 | 44 | 16 | +28 | 48 |
| 5 | Playford City Patriots | 22 | 42 | 31 | +11 | 35 |
| 6 | West Adelaide | 22 | 40 | 44 | -4 | 25 |
| 7 | White City Woodville | 22 | 35 | 30 | +5 | 33 |
| 8 | Campbelltown City | 22 | 35 | 36 | -1 | 29 |
| 9 | Sturt Lions | 22 | 35 | 36 | -1 | 27 |
| 10 | Adelaide United II | 22 | 33 | 32 | +1 | 29 |
| 11 | Adelaide Comets | 22 | 25 | 38 | -13 | 20 |
| 12 | Para Hills Knights | 22 | 16 | 102 | -86 | 2 |