Predictions / Football / Iraq. Iraqi League / Al Kahrabaa vs Al-Karma

Prediction Audit: Al Kahrabaa vs Al-Karma Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Al Kahrabaa Al Kahrabaa
Aug 26, 2026 - 15:45
1 1.21
1 1.39
xG Accuracy: 85%
Al-Karma Al-Karma

The model missed the final outcome (Draw 1–1).

The model had projected Al-Karma at 39.5%, but the full-time result went the other way.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Prediction grade C

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (2 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 Al-Karma Draw ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 1-1 ✔ Correct

Model vs Closing Market

Strong Disagreement

The closing market prices Al-Karma higher than the statistical model.

Largest probability gap: Al-Karma -16.0 pp

Outcome Model Closing Market Difference Signal
Al Kahrabaa 31.0% 19.1% +11.9 pp Model Edge
Draw 29.5% 25.4% +4.1 pp Aligned
Al-Karma 39.5% 55.5% -16.0 pp Market Higher

The closing market estimates Al-Karma's win probability at 55.5%, compared with the model's estimate of 39.5%, a difference of 16.0 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.

After full time, the result was Draw 1–1.

Market Assessment

The market is materially more optimistic about Al-Karma than the current fair estimate.

  • Investors may be incorporating information not fully reflected in the baseline model.
  • Tournament-specific context can shift market pricing.

Post Match Insights

What worked

  • Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
  • Under 2.5 goals aligned with the xG profile
  • Exact score 1–1 fell within the model's highlighted bins

What failed

  • 1X2: model leaned Al-Karma; match finished Draw

Market lesson

The closing market differed from the model on Al-Karma by 16.0 percentage points (55.5% vs model 39.5%) — in this case the market view proved closer.

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Prediction Timeline

How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.

  1. Aug 26, 2026 · 15:44 UTC Forecast generated
    • Model 1X2 · Al Kahrabaa 31.0% · Draw 29.5% · Al-Karma 39.5%
    • xG · Al Kahrabaa 1.21 — Al-Karma 1.39
  2. Aug 26, 2026 · 15:14 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
    • 1X2 odds · Al Kahrabaa 4.64 · Draw 3.49 · Al-Karma 1.60
    • Implied 1X2 · Al Kahrabaa 19.1% · Draw 25.4% · Al-Karma 55.5%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  3. Aug 26, 2026 · 15:44 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
    • 1X2 odds · Al Kahrabaa 4.64 · Draw 3.49 · Al-Karma 1.60
    • Implied 1X2 · Al Kahrabaa 19.1% · Draw 25.4% · Al-Karma 55.5%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  4. Aug 26, 2026 · 15:45 UTC Kickoff
  5. FT Full-time result Draw · 1–1
  6. FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
  7. Archived Prediction review

Historical Snapshot

Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.

Historical verdict: Monitor
Historical Decision Monitor
Outcome Missed
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
Prediction Reliability 55/100 · Moderate
  • Validation: Warning
  • Large market gap (16 pp)
Evidence ★★★★★
  • No strong statistical edge
  • Pricing remains divergent
  • Validation warning
Pricing proximity (inverse gap) 20/100
Betting Confidence 44/100

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Aug 18, 2026 · 02:18 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-4455227

Closing Odds 1.6
AI Fair Odds —
CLV Pending
Final Result Draw · Al Kahrabaa 1–1 Al-Karma
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade C

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Review FAQ

How accurate was the prediction?
This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
What does xG Accuracy measure?
xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
Does this improve the AI record?
Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Pre-match snapshot for this fixture.

  • League: Iraqi League
  • Fixture: Al Kahrabaa vs Al-Karma
  • Kickoff: 2026-08-26 15:45:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 31.0% · Draw 29.5% · Away 39.5%
  • xG (showing): Al Kahrabaa 1.21 — Al-Karma 1.39 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Value headline: None — no positive EV on tracked lines at current best prices (same as the decision block: no default bet).
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 51.8% · Over 2.5 48.2%); BTTS Yes (Yes 54.3% · No 45.7%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS Yes
  • BTTS (model): Yes 54.3% · No 45.7%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.5%)

Saying “no value” on a snapshot is a feature, not a bug: it protects readers from forcing a play when the edge is not there.

If lines move materially, re-run generation or refresh — implied probabilities and any future EV readouts will change first.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Monitor

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 29, 2026 (UTC)

Related Predictions

See Upcoming Iraqi League Matches Track Al Kahrabaa Next Match Prediction Track Al-Karma Next Match Prediction View Today's Football Predictions

Get Premium Predictions for Al Kahrabaa & Al-Karma!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Predictions
Iraqi League Iraqi League — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Al-Karma 8 6 2 0 20
2 Al Zawra'a 8 5 3 0 18
3 Erbil 8 5 2 1 17
4 Newroz 8 4 3 1 15
5 Al Shorta 8 4 3 1 15
6 Naft 8 4 3 1 15
7 Al-Jolan SC 8 2 4 2 10
8 Duhok 8 1 6 1 9
9 Diyala 8 2 3 3 9
10 Al Minaa Basra 8 2 3 3 9
11 Zakho 8 2 3 3 9
12 Al Quwa Al Jawiya 8 1 5 2 8
13 Ghaz Al Shamal 8 1 5 2 8
14 Mosul 8 2 2 4 8
15 Al Karkh 8 2 1 5 7
16 Al Kahrabaa 8 1 4 3 7
17 Al Talaba 8 1 4 3 7
18 Naft Maysan 8 1 4 3 7
19 Gharraf 8 1 2 5 5
20 Karbala 8 1 2 5 5
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Al Zawra'a 8 15 3 +12 18
2 Al-Karma 8 14 5 +9 20
3 Newroz 8 13 4 +9 15
4 Diyala 8 13 14 -1 9
5 Erbil 8 12 3 +9 17
6 Duhok 8 11 11 0 9
7 Al Quwa Al Jawiya 8 11 12 -1 8
8 Al Karkh 8 10 14 -4 7
9 Al Shorta 8 9 4 +5 15
10 Naft 8 9 5 +4 15
11 Mosul 8 9 12 -3 8
12 Al Talaba 8 9 14 -5 7
13 Al-Jolan SC 8 8 9 -1 10
14 Al Minaa Basra 8 8 10 -2 9
15 Zakho 8 7 11 -4 9
16 Al Kahrabaa 8 6 10 -4 7
17 Naft Maysan 8 6 11 -5 7
18 Karbala 8 6 15 -9 5
19 Ghaz Al Shamal 8 4 5 -1 8
20 Gharraf 8 4 12 -8 5