AI correctly predicted the Persepolis FC win.
The match finished 0–2, validating the model's directional assessment.
Tracked markets vs full-time result
Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.
- Market Prediction Result Outcome
- Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (2 goals) ✔ Correct
- Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
- 1X2 Persepolis FC Persepolis FC ✔ Correct
- Correct Score Insights 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 0-2 ✖ Incorrect
Model vs Closing Market
| Outcome | Model | Closing Market | Difference | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shams Azar Qazvin | 33.8% | 15.7% | +18.1 pp | Model Edge |
| Draw | 29.6% | 27.0% | +2.7 pp | Aligned |
| Persepolis FC | 36.6% | 57.4% | -20.8 pp | Market Higher |
The closing market estimates Persepolis FC's win probability at 57.4%, compared with the model's estimate of 36.6%, a difference of 20.8 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE5.
After full time, the model's directional lean matched the result (Persepolis FC win 0–2).
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Under 2.5 goals aligned with the xG profile
What failed
- Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS Yes; match finished BTTS No
- Exact score: outside the model's top score bins
Market lesson
Large model–market gaps do not automatically mean the market is right. Here the closing market priced Persepolis FC higher (57.4% vs model 36.6%, 20.8 pp), but the model's lean was validated (Persepolis FC win 0–2).
Prediction Timeline
How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.
-
Aug 15, 2026 · 15:58 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Shams Azar Qazvin 33.8% · Draw 29.6% · Persepolis FC 36.6%
- xG · Shams Azar Qazvin 1.27 — Persepolis FC 1.33
-
Aug 15, 2026 · 15:35 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Shams Azar Qazvin 5.75 · Draw 3.34 · Persepolis FC 1.57
- Implied 1X2 · Shams Azar Qazvin 15.7% · Draw 27.0% · Persepolis FC 57.4%
- Bookmaker · Marathonbet
-
Aug 15, 2026 · 15:58 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE5
- 1X2 odds · Shams Azar Qazvin 5.75 · Draw 3.34 · Persepolis FC 1.57
- Implied 1X2 · Shams Azar Qazvin 15.7% · Draw 27.0% · Persepolis FC 57.4%
- Bookmaker · Marathonbet
-
Aug 15, 2026 · 16:00 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Persepolis FC win · 0–2
-
FT Prediction validated Directional lean matched full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Historical Snapshot
Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.
Historical label: Originally displayed as "Wait for validation".
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
- Validation: Warning
- Large market gap (21 pp)
- No strong statistical edge
- Pricing remains divergent
- Validation warning
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Review FAQ
- How accurate was the prediction?
- This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
- What does xG Accuracy measure?
- xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
- Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
- Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
- Does this improve the AI record?
- Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore More Predictions Content
Get Premium Predictions for Shams Azar Qazvin & Persepolis FC!
Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.
Subscribe Now
Persian Gulf Pro League — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tractor Sazi | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 16 |
| 2 | Esteghlal FC | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 15 |
| 3 | Persepolis FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 |
| 4 | Aluminium Arak | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 12 |
| 5 | Sepahan FC | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 |
| 6 | Gol Gohar | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 10 |
| 7 | Foolad FC | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 9 |
| 8 | Paykan | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 8 |
| 9 | Nassaji Mazandaran | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 8 |
| 10 | Chadormalu SC | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 8 |
| 11 | Fajr Sepasi | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 7 |
| 12 | Malavan | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| 13 | Kheybar Khorramabad | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 |
| 14 | ZOB Ahan | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 |
| 15 | Esteghlal Khuzestan | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| 16 | Shams Azar Qazvin | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5 |
| 17 | Mes Shahr-e Babak | 7 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 5 |
| 18 | Sanat Naft | 7 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Persepolis FC | 6 | 12 | 3 | +9 | 13 |
| 2 | Esteghlal FC | 7 | 9 | 1 | +8 | 15 |
| 3 | Tractor Sazi | 7 | 8 | 1 | +7 | 16 |
| 4 | Aluminium Arak | 6 | 8 | 3 | +5 | 12 |
| 5 | Kheybar Khorramabad | 6 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 6 |
| 6 | Gol Gohar | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 10 |
| 7 | Shams Azar Qazvin | 7 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 5 |
| 8 | Foolad FC | 6 | 5 | 3 | +2 | 9 |
| 9 | Sepahan FC | 6 | 5 | 4 | +1 | 10 |
| 10 | Paykan | 7 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 8 |
| 11 | Malavan | 6 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 7 |
| 12 | Mes Shahr-e Babak | 7 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 5 |
| 13 | Nassaji Mazandaran | 7 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 8 |
| 14 | Chadormalu SC | 7 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 8 |
| 15 | Esteghlal Khuzestan | 7 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 6 |
| 16 | Fajr Sepasi | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 7 |
| 17 | ZOB Ahan | 6 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 6 |
| 18 | Sanat Naft | 7 | 2 | 8 | -6 | 4 |
