AI correctly predicted the Draw.
The match finished 1–1, validating the model's directional assessment.
Tracked markets vs full-time result
Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.
- Market Prediction Result Outcome
- Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Under 2.5 (2 goals) ✖ Incorrect
- Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
- 1X2 draw Draw ✔ Correct
- Correct Score Insights 0-0, 1-0, 0-1, 1-1, 2-0 1-1 ✔ Correct
Model vs Closing Market
| Outcome | Model | Closing Market | Difference | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olympic El Qanah | 33.2% | 26.3% | +7.0 pp | Model Higher |
| Draw | 34.5% | 36.6% | -2.0 pp | Aligned |
| El Geish | 32.2% | 37.1% | -4.9 pp | Aligned |
The statistical model estimates Olympic El Qanah's win probability at 33.2%, compared with the closing market's implied probability of 26.3%, a difference of 7.0 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model's assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
After full time, the model's directional lean matched the result (Draw 1–1).
Market Assessment
The fair estimate shows a modest edge over current market pricing on Olympic El Qanah.
- Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Low-scoring profile materialised (ΣxG 1.98, 2 goals)
- Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
- Exact score 1–1 fell within the model's highlighted bins
What failed
- Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Over 2.5; match finished Under 2.5 (2 goals)
Market lesson
Large model–market gaps do not automatically mean the market is right. Here the closing market priced Draw more conservatively (27.5% vs model 34.5%, 7.0 pp), but the model's lean was validated (Draw 1–1).
Prediction Timeline
How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.
-
Sep 07, 2026 · 13:59 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Olympic El Qanah 33.2% · Draw 34.6% · El Geish 32.2%
- xG · Olympic El Qanah 1.00 — El Geish 0.98
-
Sep 07, 2026 · 13:29 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Olympic El Qanah 3.63 · Draw 2.61 · El Geish 2.57
- Implied 1X2 · Olympic El Qanah 26.3% · Draw 36.6% · El Geish 37.1%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Sep 07, 2026 · 13:59 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Olympic El Qanah 3.63 · Draw 2.61 · El Geish 2.57
- Implied 1X2 · Olympic El Qanah 26.3% · Draw 36.6% · El Geish 37.1%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Sep 07, 2026 · 14:00 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Draw · 1–1
-
FT Prediction validated Directional lean matched full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Historical Snapshot
Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
- Validation: Pass
- No strong statistical edge
- Direction agrees with model lean
- Validation passed
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Review FAQ
- How accurate was the prediction?
- This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
- What does xG Accuracy measure?
- xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
- Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
- Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
- Does this improve the AI record?
- Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore More Predictions Content
Get Premium Predictions for Olympic El Qanah & El Geish!
Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.
Subscribe Now
Premier League — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pyramids FC | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 15 |
| 2 | Zamalek SC | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 13 |
| 3 | Al Ahly | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 13 |
| 4 | Ceramica Cleopatra | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 12 |
| 5 | Future FC | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| 6 | Al Ittihad | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| 7 | El Mokawloon | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| 8 | Petrojet | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| 9 | El Geish | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| 10 | Masr | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| 11 | Olympic El Qanah | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
| 12 | AL Masry | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| 13 | National Bank of Egypt | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| 14 | Wadi Degla | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| 15 | Enppi | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| 16 | Smouha SC | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| 17 | Abu Qair Semad | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 |
| 18 | El Gouna FC | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
| 19 | Asyut Petrol | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
| 20 | Ghazl El Mehalla | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ceramica Cleopatra | 5 | 10 | 3 | +7 | 12 |
| 2 | Pyramids FC | 5 | 9 | 1 | +8 | 15 |
| 3 | Al Ahly | 5 | 9 | 3 | +6 | 13 |
| 4 | Zamalek SC | 5 | 8 | 1 | +7 | 13 |
| 5 | Petrojet | 5 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 7 |
| 6 | Future FC | 5 | 7 | 4 | +3 | 10 |
| 7 | Al Ittihad | 5 | 6 | 3 | +3 | 10 |
| 8 | El Mokawloon | 5 | 6 | 5 | +1 | 7 |
| 9 | Enppi | 5 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 4 |
| 10 | El Geish | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 7 |
| 11 | Olympic El Qanah | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| 12 | AL Masry | 5 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 6 |
| 13 | Masr | 5 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 7 |
| 14 | Wadi Degla | 5 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 5 |
| 15 | National Bank of Egypt | 5 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 6 |
| 16 | El Gouna FC | 5 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 2 |
| 17 | Smouha SC | 5 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 4 |
| 18 | Asyut Petrol | 5 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 2 |
| 19 | Abu Qair Semad | 5 | 1 | 8 | -7 | 3 |
| 20 | Ghazl El Mehalla | 5 | 1 | 9 | -8 | 1 |
| # | TEAM | MP | xG | xGC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pyramids FC | 5 | 4.7 | 1.0 | +3.7 | 15 |
| 2 | AL Masry | 5 | 4.8 | 2.7 | +2.1 | 6 |
| 3 | Petrojet | 5 | 5.3 | 3.7 | +1.6 | 7 |
| 4 | National Bank of Egypt | 5 | 4.0 | 2.4 | +1.6 | 6 |
| 5 | Ceramica Cleopatra | 5 | 5.5 | 4.1 | +1.4 | 12 |
| 6 | Al Ahly | 5 | 4.2 | 3.0 | +1.2 | 13 |
| 7 | Wadi Degla | 5 | 3.6 | 3.3 | +0.3 | 5 |
| 8 | Smouha SC | 5 | 2.2 | 1.9 | +0.3 | 4 |
| 9 | Asyut Petrol | 5 | 1.9 | 1.7 | +0.2 | 2 |
| 10 | Future FC | 5 | 4.6 | 4.5 | +0.1 | 10 |
| 11 | Al Ittihad | 5 | 3.7 | 3.6 | +0.1 | 10 |
| 12 | El Geish | 5 | 2.9 | 3.0 | -0.1 | 7 |
| 13 | Masr | 5 | 3.1 | 3.6 | -0.5 | 7 |
| 14 | Enppi | 5 | 4.9 | 5.7 | -0.8 | 4 |
| 15 | Abu Qair Semad | 5 | 0.9 | 1.7 | -0.8 | 3 |
| 16 | El Mokawloon | 5 | 3.4 | 4.4 | -1.0 | 7 |
| 17 | El Gouna FC | 5 | 3.2 | 4.9 | -1.7 | 2 |
| 18 | Olympic El Qanah | 5 | 2.4 | 4.5 | -2.1 | 6 |
| 19 | Zamalek SC | 5 | 2.6 | 5.0 | -2.4 | 13 |
| 20 | Ghazl El Mehalla | 5 | 1.9 | 5.0 | -3.1 | 1 |
