AI correctly predicted the Lanús Res. win.
The match finished 2–1, validating the model's directional assessment.
Tracked markets vs full-time result
Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.
- Market Prediction Result Outcome
- Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (3 goals) ✖ Incorrect
- Both Teams To Score BTTS No Yes ✖ Incorrect
- 1X2 Lanús Res. Lanús Res. ✔ Correct
- Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 2-1 ✔ Correct
Model vs Closing Market
| Outcome | Model | Closing Market | Difference | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lanús Res. | 36.1% | 52.7% | -16.6 pp | Market Higher |
| Draw | 29.6% | 24.0% | +5.7 pp | Model Higher |
| Banfield Res. | 34.2% | 23.3% | +10.9 pp | Model Edge |
The closing market estimates Lanús Res.'s win probability at 52.7%, compared with the model's estimate of 36.1%, a difference of 16.6 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
After full time, the model's directional lean matched the result (Lanús Res. win 2–1).
Market Assessment
The market is materially more optimistic about Lanús Res. than the current fair estimate.
- Investors may be incorporating information not fully reflected in the baseline model.
- Tournament-specific context can shift market pricing.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.60) — 3 goals materialised
- Exact score 2–1 fell within the model's highlighted bins
What failed
- Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS No; match finished BTTS Yes
- Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (3 goals)
Market lesson
Large model–market gaps do not automatically mean the market is right. Here the closing market priced Lanús Res. higher (52.7% vs model 36.1%, 16.6 pp), but the model's lean was validated (Lanús Res. win 2–1).
Prediction Timeline
How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.
-
Sep 23, 2026 · 17:59 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Lanús Res. 36.1% · Draw 29.7% · Banfield Res. 34.2%
- xG · Lanús Res. 1.32 — Banfield Res. 1.28
-
Sep 23, 2026 · 17:29 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Lanús Res. 1.74 · Draw 3.82 · Banfield Res. 3.93
- Implied 1X2 · Lanús Res. 52.7% · Draw 24.0% · Banfield Res. 23.3%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Sep 23, 2026 · 17:59 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Lanús Res. 1.74 · Draw 3.82 · Banfield Res. 3.93
- Implied 1X2 · Lanús Res. 52.7% · Draw 24.0% · Banfield Res. 23.3%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Sep 23, 2026 · 20:00 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Lanús Res. win · 2–1
-
FT Prediction validated Directional lean matched full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Historical Snapshot
Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
- Validation: Warning
- Large market gap (17 pp)
- No strong statistical edge
- Pricing remains divergent
- Validation warning
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Review FAQ
- How accurate was the prediction?
- This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
- What does xG Accuracy measure?
- xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
- Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
- Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
- Does this improve the AI record?
- Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore More Predictions Content
Get Premium Predictions for Lanús Res. & Banfield Res.!
Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.
Subscribe Now
Reserve League — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vélez Sársfield Res. | 20 | 15 | 2 | 3 | 47 |
| 2 | Boca Juniors Res. | 20 | 12 | 3 | 5 | 39 |
| 3 | Racing Club Res. | 21 | 11 | 6 | 4 | 39 |
| 4 | River Plate Res. | 21 | 11 | 4 | 6 | 37 |
| 5 | Independiente Res. | 19 | 11 | 3 | 5 | 36 |
| 6 | Lanús Res. | 19 | 11 | 2 | 6 | 35 |
| 7 | Newell's Old Boys Res. | 19 | 10 | 4 | 5 | 34 |
| 8 | Quilmes 2 | 18 | 10 | 3 | 5 | 33 |
| 9 | Defensa y Justicia Res. | 18 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 32 |
| 10 | Atlético Tucumán Res. | 19 | 9 | 3 | 7 | 30 |
| 11 | Unión Santa Fe Res. | 18 | 7 | 8 | 3 | 29 |
| 12 | Estudiantes La Plata Res | 18 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 28 |
| 13 | Argentinos Juniors Res. | 18 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 28 |
| 14 | Belgrano Córdoba Res. | 18 | 8 | 3 | 7 | 27 |
| 15 | Talleres Córdoba Res. | 18 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 26 |
| 16 | Huracán Res. | 18 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 26 |
| 17 | Rosario Central Res. | 18 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 26 |
| 18 | Platense Res. | 18 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 26 |
| 19 | Deportivo Riestra Res. | 18 | 7 | 4 | 7 | 25 |
| 20 | Independiente Riva. Res. | 18 | 7 | 3 | 8 | 24 |
| 21 | Instituto Res. | 18 | 5 | 9 | 4 | 24 |
| 22 | San Lorenzo Res. | 18 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 24 |
| 23 | Gimnasia La Plata Res. | 18 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 23 |
| 24 | Gimnasia Mendoza 2 | 18 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 23 |
| 25 | Banfield Res. | 18 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 23 |
| 26 | Ferro 2 | 18 | 6 | 4 | 8 | 22 |
| 27 | Central Córdoba SdE Res. | 18 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 19 |
| 28 | Colón Res. | 18 | 5 | 3 | 10 | 18 |
| 29 | Aldosivi Res. | 18 | 5 | 3 | 10 | 18 |
| 30 | Barracas Central Res. | 18 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 17 |
| 31 | Sarmiento Res. | 18 | 4 | 4 | 10 | 16 |
| 32 | Tigre Res. | 18 | 4 | 4 | 10 | 16 |
| 33 | Godoy Cruz Res. | 18 | 4 | 3 | 11 | 15 |
| 34 | Atl. Rafaela 2 | 18 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 12 |
| 35 | Estudiantes Rio Cuarto 2 | 18 | 2 | 5 | 11 | 11 |
| 36 | San Martín San Juan Res. | 18 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 8 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vélez Sársfield Res. | 20 | 42 | 13 | +29 | 47 |
| 2 | Lanús Res. | 19 | 40 | 27 | +13 | 35 |
| 3 | Independiente Res. | 19 | 38 | 19 | +19 | 36 |
| 4 | Defensa y Justicia Res. | 18 | 38 | 24 | +14 | 32 |
| 5 | Boca Juniors Res. | 20 | 36 | 12 | +24 | 39 |
| 6 | Racing Club Res. | 21 | 33 | 26 | +7 | 39 |
| 7 | River Plate Res. | 21 | 29 | 20 | +9 | 37 |
| 8 | Newell's Old Boys Res. | 19 | 27 | 18 | +9 | 34 |
| 9 | Talleres Córdoba Res. | 18 | 27 | 21 | +6 | 26 |
| 10 | Belgrano Córdoba Res. | 18 | 27 | 29 | -2 | 27 |
| 11 | Atlético Tucumán Res. | 19 | 26 | 28 | -2 | 30 |
| 12 | Estudiantes La Plata Res | 18 | 25 | 16 | +9 | 28 |
| 13 | Deportivo Riestra Res. | 18 | 25 | 18 | +7 | 25 |
| 14 | Rosario Central Res. | 18 | 25 | 22 | +3 | 26 |
| 15 | Argentinos Juniors Res. | 18 | 24 | 18 | +6 | 28 |
| 16 | Huracán Res. | 18 | 23 | 17 | +6 | 26 |
| 17 | Unión Santa Fe Res. | 18 | 23 | 19 | +4 | 29 |
| 18 | Independiente Riva. Res. | 18 | 23 | 23 | 0 | 24 |
| 19 | San Lorenzo Res. | 18 | 22 | 24 | -2 | 24 |
| 20 | Central Córdoba SdE Res. | 18 | 21 | 33 | -12 | 19 |
| 21 | Atl. Rafaela 2 | 18 | 21 | 36 | -15 | 12 |
| 22 | Quilmes 2 | 18 | 20 | 12 | +8 | 33 |
| 23 | Instituto Res. | 18 | 20 | 21 | -1 | 24 |
| 24 | Ferro 2 | 18 | 20 | 23 | -3 | 22 |
| 25 | Godoy Cruz Res. | 18 | 20 | 30 | -10 | 15 |
| 26 | Gimnasia La Plata Res. | 18 | 19 | 17 | +2 | 23 |
| 27 | Platense Res. | 18 | 17 | 20 | -3 | 26 |
| 28 | Aldosivi Res. | 18 | 17 | 28 | -11 | 18 |
| 29 | Gimnasia Mendoza 2 | 18 | 16 | 19 | -3 | 23 |
| 30 | Sarmiento Res. | 18 | 16 | 26 | -10 | 16 |
| 31 | San Martín San Juan Res. | 18 | 16 | 59 | -43 | 8 |
| 32 | Colón Res. | 18 | 15 | 23 | -8 | 18 |
| 33 | Tigre Res. | 18 | 15 | 25 | -10 | 16 |
| 34 | Banfield Res. | 18 | 14 | 18 | -4 | 23 |
| 35 | Barracas Central Res. | 18 | 11 | 24 | -13 | 17 |
| 36 | Estudiantes Rio Cuarto 2 | 18 | 9 | 32 | -23 | 11 |