Predictions / Football / Argentina. Reserve League / Quilmes 2 vs Platense Res.

Prediction Audit: Quilmes 2 vs Platense Res. Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Aug 13, 2026 - 18:00
1 1.37
0 1.23
xG Accuracy: 64%

AI correctly predicted the Quilmes 2 win.

The match finished 1–0, validating the model's directional assessment.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Prediction grade B-

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (1 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 Quilmes 2 Quilmes 2 ✔ Correct
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 1-0 ✔ Correct

Model vs Closing Market

Strong Disagreement

The closing market prices Quilmes 2 higher than the statistical model.

Largest probability gap: Quilmes 2 -14.8 pp

Outcome Model Closing Market Difference Signal
Quilmes 2 38.5% 53.3% -14.8 pp Market Higher
Draw 29.6% 27.6% +2.0 pp Aligned
Platense Res. 31.9% 19.1% +12.8 pp Model Edge

The closing market estimates Quilmes 2's win probability at 53.3%, compared with the model's estimate of 38.5%, a difference of 14.8 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.

After full time, the model's directional lean matched the result (Quilmes 2 win 1–0).

Market Assessment

The market is materially more optimistic about Quilmes 2 than the current fair estimate.

  • Investors may be incorporating information not fully reflected in the baseline model.
  • Tournament-specific context can shift market pricing.

Post Match Insights

What worked

  • Under 2.5 goals aligned with the xG profile
  • Exact score 1–0 fell within the model's highlighted bins

What failed

  • Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS Yes; match finished BTTS No

Market lesson

Large model–market gaps do not automatically mean the market is right. Here the closing market priced Quilmes 2 higher (53.3% vs model 38.5%, 14.8 pp), but the model's lean was validated (Quilmes 2 win 1–0).

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Prediction Timeline

How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.

  1. Aug 13, 2026 · 18:00 UTC Forecast generated
    • Model 1X2 · Quilmes 2 38.5% · Draw 29.6% · Platense Res. 31.9%
    • xG · Quilmes 2 1.37 — Platense Res. 1.23
  2. Aug 13, 2026 · 17:31 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
    • 1X2 odds · Quilmes 2 1.72 · Draw 3.32 · Platense Res. 4.79
    • Implied 1X2 · Quilmes 2 53.3% · Draw 27.6% · Platense Res. 19.1%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  3. Aug 13, 2026 · 18:00 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
    • 1X2 odds · Quilmes 2 1.72 · Draw 3.32 · Platense Res. 4.79
    • Implied 1X2 · Quilmes 2 53.3% · Draw 27.6% · Platense Res. 19.1%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  4. Aug 13, 2026 · 18:00 UTC Kickoff
  5. FT Full-time result Quilmes 2 win · 1–0
  6. FT Prediction validated Directional lean matched full-time result
  7. Archived Prediction review

Historical Snapshot

Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.

Historical verdict: Monitor
Historical Decision Monitor
Outcome Validated
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
Prediction Reliability 56/100 · Moderate
  • Validation: Warning
  • Large market gap (15 pp)
Evidence ★★★★★
  • No strong statistical edge
  • Market has already priced much of the edge
  • Validation warning
Pricing proximity (inverse gap) 26/100
Betting Confidence 44/100

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Aug 07, 2026 · 01:52 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-3153407

Closing Odds 1.72
AI Fair Odds —
CLV Pending
Final Result Quilmes 2 win · Quilmes 2 1–0 Platense Res.
Prediction ✔ Correct
Decision Grade B-

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Review FAQ

How accurate was the prediction?
This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
What does xG Accuracy measure?
xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
Does this improve the AI record?
Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Pre-match snapshot for this fixture.

  • League: Reserve League
  • Fixture: Quilmes 2 vs Platense Res.
  • Kickoff: 2026-08-13 18:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 38.5% · Draw 29.6% · Away 31.9%
  • xG (showing): Quilmes 2 1.37 — Platense Res. 1.23 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Value headline: None (actionable) — best tracked EV is about +1.6%, still below the +2.0% minimum for a headline / default stake (no default bet).
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 51.8% · Over 2.5 48.2%); BTTS Yes (Yes 54.4% · No 45.6%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS Yes
  • BTTS (model): Yes 54.4% · No 45.6%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.5%)

When book depth is thin or odds are missing, EV may be unavailable even though the model still prefers one side on totals or BTTS — wait for cleaner prices or skip.

Prefer skipping to over-staking when the engine is honest about missing edge.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Monitor

Outcome: Validated — Pre-match lean validated against the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 29, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Quilmes 2 & Platense Res.!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Predictions
Reserve League Reserve League — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Vélez Sársfield Res. 20 15 2 3 47
2 Boca Juniors Res. 20 12 3 5 39
3 Racing Club Res. 21 11 6 4 39
4 River Plate Res. 21 11 4 6 37
5 Independiente Res. 19 11 3 5 36
6 Lanús Res. 19 11 2 6 35
7 Newell's Old Boys Res. 19 10 4 5 34
8 Quilmes 2 18 10 3 5 33
9 Defensa y Justicia Res. 18 9 5 4 32
10 Atlético Tucumán Res. 19 9 3 7 30
11 Unión Santa Fe Res. 18 7 8 3 29
12 Estudiantes La Plata Res 18 8 4 6 28
13 Argentinos Juniors Res. 18 7 7 4 28
14 Belgrano Córdoba Res. 18 8 3 7 27
15 Talleres Córdoba Res. 18 7 5 6 26
16 Huracán Res. 18 7 5 6 26
17 Rosario Central Res. 18 7 5 6 26
18 Platense Res. 18 7 5 6 26
19 Deportivo Riestra Res. 18 7 4 7 25
20 Independiente Riva. Res. 18 7 3 8 24
21 Instituto Res. 18 5 9 4 24
22 San Lorenzo Res. 18 6 6 6 24
23 Gimnasia La Plata Res. 18 6 5 7 23
24 Gimnasia Mendoza 2 18 6 5 7 23
25 Banfield Res. 18 6 5 7 23
26 Ferro 2 18 6 4 8 22
27 Central Córdoba SdE Res. 18 5 4 9 19
28 Colón Res. 18 5 3 10 18
29 Aldosivi Res. 18 5 3 10 18
30 Barracas Central Res. 18 4 5 9 17
31 Sarmiento Res. 18 4 4 10 16
32 Tigre Res. 18 4 4 10 16
33 Godoy Cruz Res. 18 4 3 11 15
34 Atl. Rafaela 2 18 3 3 12 12
35 Estudiantes Rio Cuarto 2 18 2 5 11 11
36 San Martín San Juan Res. 18 2 2 14 8
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Vélez Sársfield Res. 20 42 13 +29 47
2 Lanús Res. 19 40 27 +13 35
3 Independiente Res. 19 38 19 +19 36
4 Defensa y Justicia Res. 18 38 24 +14 32
5 Boca Juniors Res. 20 36 12 +24 39
6 Racing Club Res. 21 33 26 +7 39
7 River Plate Res. 21 29 20 +9 37
8 Newell's Old Boys Res. 19 27 18 +9 34
9 Talleres Córdoba Res. 18 27 21 +6 26
10 Belgrano Córdoba Res. 18 27 29 -2 27
11 Atlético Tucumán Res. 19 26 28 -2 30
12 Estudiantes La Plata Res 18 25 16 +9 28
13 Deportivo Riestra Res. 18 25 18 +7 25
14 Rosario Central Res. 18 25 22 +3 26
15 Argentinos Juniors Res. 18 24 18 +6 28
16 Huracán Res. 18 23 17 +6 26
17 Unión Santa Fe Res. 18 23 19 +4 29
18 Independiente Riva. Res. 18 23 23 0 24
19 San Lorenzo Res. 18 22 24 -2 24
20 Central Córdoba SdE Res. 18 21 33 -12 19
21 Atl. Rafaela 2 18 21 36 -15 12
22 Quilmes 2 18 20 12 +8 33
23 Instituto Res. 18 20 21 -1 24
24 Ferro 2 18 20 23 -3 22
25 Godoy Cruz Res. 18 20 30 -10 15
26 Gimnasia La Plata Res. 18 19 17 +2 23
27 Platense Res. 18 17 20 -3 26
28 Aldosivi Res. 18 17 28 -11 18
29 Gimnasia Mendoza 2 18 16 19 -3 23
30 Sarmiento Res. 18 16 26 -10 16
31 San Martín San Juan Res. 18 16 59 -43 8
32 Colón Res. 18 15 23 -8 18
33 Tigre Res. 18 15 25 -10 16
34 Banfield Res. 18 14 18 -4 23
35 Barracas Central Res. 18 11 24 -13 17
36 Estudiantes Rio Cuarto 2 18 9 32 -23 11