Prediction Audit: Renate vs Treviso Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Sep 27, 2026 - 15:30
0 1.41
1 1.19
xG Accuracy: 64%

The model missed the final outcome (Treviso win 0–1).

The model had projected Renate at 40.4%, but the full-time result went the other way.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Prediction grade F

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Under 2.5 (1 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 Renate Treviso ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 0-0 0-1 ✔ Correct

Model vs Closing Market

Broadly Aligned

The model and closing market are broadly aligned.

Largest probability gap: Draw -0.5 pp

Outcome Model Closing Market Difference Signal
Renate 40.4% 40.0% +0.4 pp Aligned
Draw 29.4% 29.9% -0.5 pp Aligned
Treviso 30.1% 30.0% +0.1 pp Aligned

The model and closing market are broadly aligned, with probability differences below 5 percentage points.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.

After full time, the result was Treviso win 0–1.

Market Assessment

The market and model are broadly aligned. Any small pricing gap likely reflects rounding or bookmaker margin, not a structural disagreement.

  • Current pricing remains close to the model baseline.

Post Match Insights

What worked

  • Exact score 0–1 fell within the model's highlighted bins

What failed

  • Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS Yes; match finished BTTS No
  • Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Over 2.5; match finished Under 2.5 (1 goals)

Market lesson

The full-time result was Treviso win 0–1, which did not match the model's pre-match lean on 1X2.

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Prediction Timeline

How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.

  1. Sep 27, 2026 · 15:29 UTC Forecast generated
    • Model 1X2 · Renate 40.5% · Draw 29.4% · Treviso 30.1%
    • xG · Renate 1.41 — Treviso 1.19
  2. Sep 27, 2026 · 15:02 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
    • 1X2 odds · Renate 2.32 · Draw 3.10 · Treviso 3.09
    • Implied 1X2 · Renate 40.0% · Draw 29.9% · Treviso 30.0%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  3. Sep 27, 2026 · 15:29 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
    • 1X2 odds · Renate 2.32 · Draw 3.10 · Treviso 3.09
    • Implied 1X2 · Renate 40.0% · Draw 29.9% · Treviso 30.0%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  4. Sep 27, 2026 · 15:30 UTC Kickoff
  5. FT Full-time result Treviso win · 0–1
  6. FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
  7. Archived Prediction review

Historical Snapshot

Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.

Historical verdict: Observe
Historical Decision No Primary Bet
Outcome Missed
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
Prediction Reliability 79/100 · High
  • Validation: Pass
Evidence ★★★★★
  • No strong statistical edge
  • Direction agrees with model lean
  • Validation passed
Market Compatibility 97/100
Betting Confidence 82/100

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Sep 21, 2026 · 02:01 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-10103679

Closing Odds 3.1
AI Fair Odds —
CLV Pending
Final Result Treviso win · Renate 0–1 Treviso
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Review FAQ

How accurate was the prediction?
This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
What does xG Accuracy measure?
xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
Does this improve the AI record?
Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Pre-match snapshot for this fixture.

  • League: Serie C - Girone A
  • Fixture: Renate vs Treviso
  • Kickoff: 2026-09-27 15:30:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 40.5% · Draw 29.4% · Away 30.1%
  • xG (showing): Renate 1.41 — Treviso 1.19 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Best +EV line (same label as hero card when Primary thresholds are not met): Over 2.5 goals
  • Model: 48.2% · Implied: 44.9% · Probability edge: +3.3 pts · Est. EV: +6.0%
  • BTTS (model): Yes 54.2% · No 45.8%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.5%)

Where EV is shown, it is estimated return per unit stake at the best tracked decimal price — not the same thing as a raw probability gap.

1X2 can look balanced even when side markets show clearer structure.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: No Primary Bet

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 28, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Renate & Treviso!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Predictions
Serie C - Girone A Serie C - Girone A — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Cittadella 7 7 0 0 21
2 Union Brescia 7 4 3 0 15
3 Ospitaletto 7 4 2 1 14
4 Arzignano Valchiampo 7 4 1 2 13
5 Trento 7 3 4 0 13
6 Treviso 7 3 3 1 12
7 Alcione 7 2 4 1 10
8 Dolomiti Bellunesi 7 2 4 1 10
9 Albinoleffe 7 2 3 2 9
10 Lumezzane 7 2 2 3 8
11 Lecco 7 2 2 3 8
12 Desenzano Calvina 7 1 4 2 7
13 Pergolettese 7 1 4 2 7
14 Athletic Carpi 7 1 3 3 6
15 Folgore Caratese 7 1 3 3 6
16 Juventus U23 7 1 3 3 6
17 Novara 7 1 3 3 6
18 PRO Vercelli 7 1 3 3 6
19 Giana Erminio 7 0 3 4 3
20 Renate 7 0 2 5 2
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Cittadella 7 13 2 +11 21
2 Ospitaletto 7 13 5 +8 14
3 Union Brescia 7 12 4 +8 15
4 Arzignano Valchiampo 7 10 7 +3 13
5 Albinoleffe 7 10 9 +1 9
6 Alcione 7 10 11 -1 10
7 Athletic Carpi 7 10 15 -5 6
8 Trento 7 9 3 +6 13
9 Treviso 7 8 6 +2 12
10 Folgore Caratese 7 8 10 -2 6
11 Lumezzane 7 7 9 -2 8
12 Juventus U23 7 7 13 -6 6
13 Dolomiti Bellunesi 7 6 5 +1 10
14 Novara 7 6 9 -3 6
15 Giana Erminio 7 6 10 -4 3
16 PRO Vercelli 7 6 11 -5 6
17 Renate 7 5 11 -6 2
18 Lecco 7 4 6 -2 8
19 Desenzano Calvina 7 4 6 -2 7
20 Pergolettese 7 1 3 -2 7