Prediction Audit: Alcione vs Renate Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Aug 21, 2026 - 19:00
3 1.21
1 1.39
xG Accuracy: 55%

The model missed the final outcome (Alcione win 3–1).

The model had projected Renate at 39.5%, but the full-time result went the other way.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Prediction grade F

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (4 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 Renate Alcione ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 3-1 ✖ Incorrect

Model vs Closing Market

Moderate Disagreement

The model rates Renate considerably stronger than the closing betting market.

Largest probability gap: Renate +5.9 pp

Outcome Model Closing Market Difference Signal
Alcione 31.0% 33.5% -2.4 pp Aligned
Draw 29.5% 33.0% -3.5 pp Aligned
Renate 39.5% 33.6% +5.9 pp Model Higher

The statistical model estimates Renate's win probability at 39.5%, compared with the closing market's implied probability of 33.6%, a difference of 5.9 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model's assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.

After full time, the result was Alcione win 3–1.

Market Assessment

The fair estimate shows a modest edge over current market pricing on Renate.

  • Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.

Post Match Insights

What worked

  • Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.60) — 4 goals materialised
  • Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result

What failed

  • Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (4 goals)
  • 1X2: model leaned Renate; match finished Alcione

Market lesson

The closing market differed from the model on Renate by 5.9 percentage points (33.6% vs model 39.5%) — in this case the market view proved closer.

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Prediction Timeline

How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.

  1. Aug 21, 2026 · 18:59 UTC Forecast generated
    • Model 1X2 · Alcione 31.0% · Draw 29.5% · Renate 39.5%
    • xG · Alcione 1.21 — Renate 1.39
  2. Aug 21, 2026 · 18:33 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
    • 1X2 odds · Alcione 2.81 · Draw 2.85 · Renate 2.80
    • Implied 1X2 · Alcione 33.5% · Draw 33.0% · Renate 33.6%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  3. Aug 21, 2026 · 18:59 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
    • 1X2 odds · Alcione 2.81 · Draw 2.85 · Renate 2.80
    • Implied 1X2 · Alcione 33.5% · Draw 33.0% · Renate 33.6%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  4. Aug 21, 2026 · 19:00 UTC Kickoff
  5. FT Full-time result Alcione win · 3–1
  6. FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
  7. Archived Prediction review

Historical Snapshot

Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.

Historical verdict: Observe
Historical Decision No Primary Bet
Outcome Missed
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
Prediction Reliability 76/100 · High
  • Validation: Pass
Evidence
  • No strong statistical edge
  • Direction agrees with model lean
  • Validation passed
Market Compatibility 70/100
Betting Confidence 79/100

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Aug 15, 2026 · 02:23 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-4039519

Closing Odds 2.8
AI Fair Odds
CLV Pending
Final Result Alcione win · Alcione 3–1 Renate
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Review FAQ

How accurate was the prediction?
This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
What does xG Accuracy measure?
xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
Does this improve the AI record?
Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

  • League: Serie C - Girone A
  • Fixture: Alcione vs Renate
  • Kickoff: 2026-08-21 19:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 31.0% · Draw 29.5% · Away 39.5%
  • xG (showing): Alcione 1.21 — Renate 1.39 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Value headline: None (actionable) — best tracked EV is about +0.8%, still below the +2.0% minimum for a headline / default stake (no default bet).
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 51.8% · Over 2.5 48.2%); BTTS Yes (Yes 54.3% · No 45.7%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS Yes
  • BTTS (model): Yes 54.3% · No 45.7%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.5%)

Saying “no value” on a snapshot is a feature, not a bug: it protects readers from forcing a play when the edge is not there.

If lines move materially, re-run generation or refresh — implied probabilities and any future EV readouts will change first.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: No Primary Bet

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 16, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Alcione & Renate!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Predictions
Serie C - Girone A Serie C - Girone AStandings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Cittadella 3 3 0 0 9
2 Union Brescia 3 3 0 0 9
3 Ospitaletto 3 2 1 0 7
4 Dolomiti Bellunesi 3 2 1 0 7
5 Trento 3 2 1 0 7
6 Alcione 3 1 2 0 5
7 Juventus U23 3 1 2 0 5
8 Athletic Carpi 3 1 1 1 4
9 Novara 3 1 1 1 4
10 Albinoleffe 3 1 1 1 4
11 Treviso 3 1 1 1 4
12 PRO Vercelli 3 1 1 1 4
13 Arzignano Valchiampo 3 1 1 1 4
14 Lumezzane 3 1 0 2 3
15 Desenzano Calvina 3 0 2 1 2
16 Folgore Caratese 3 0 1 2 1
17 Lecco 3 0 1 2 1
18 Pergolettese 3 0 1 2 1
19 Giana Erminio 3 0 0 3 0
20 Renate 3 0 0 3 0
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Ospitaletto 3 6 2 +4 7
2 Cittadella 3 5 1 +4 9
3 Union Brescia 3 5 1 +4 9
4 Athletic Carpi 3 5 6 -1 4
5 Dolomiti Bellunesi 3 4 2 +2 7
6 Alcione 3 4 2 +2 5
7 Juventus U23 3 4 3 +1 5
8 Novara 3 4 4 0 4
9 Trento 3 3 1 +2 7
10 Albinoleffe 3 3 3 0 4
11 Treviso 3 3 3 0 4
12 Folgore Caratese 3 3 5 -2 1
13 PRO Vercelli 3 2 2 0 4
14 Arzignano Valchiampo 3 2 3 -1 4
15 Lumezzane 3 2 4 -2 3
16 Giana Erminio 3 2 5 -3 0
17 Renate 3 2 6 -4 0
18 Desenzano Calvina 3 1 2 -1 2
19 Lecco 3 0 2 -2 1
20 Pergolettese 3 0 3 -3 1