The model missed the final outcome (Kalsdorf win 1–2).
The model had projected Gleisdorf 09 at 36.1%, but the full-time result went the other way.
Tracked markets vs full-time result
Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.
- Market Prediction Result Outcome
- Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (3 goals) ✖ Incorrect
- Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
- 1X2 Gleisdorf 09 Kalsdorf ✖ Incorrect
- Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 1-2 ✔ Correct
Model vs Closing Market
| Outcome | Model | Closing Market | Difference | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gleisdorf 09 | 36.1% | 31.4% | +4.7 pp | Aligned |
| Draw | 29.6% | 24.6% | +5.0 pp | Model Higher |
| Kalsdorf | 34.2% | 44.0% | -9.8 pp | Market Higher |
The closing market estimates Kalsdorf's win probability at 44.0%, compared with the model's estimate of 34.2%, a difference of 9.8 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
After full time, the result was Kalsdorf win 1–2.
Market Assessment
The market and model broadly agree on Kalsdorf. The remaining divergence may reflect differences in team-strength assumptions rather than a directional disagreement.
- Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.60) — 3 goals materialised
- Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
- Exact score 1–2 fell within the model's highlighted bins
What failed
- Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (3 goals)
- 1X2: model leaned Gleisdorf 09; match finished Kalsdorf
Market lesson
The closing market differed from the model on Gleisdorf 09 by 9.8 percentage points (45.9% vs model 36.1%) — in this case the market view proved closer.
Prediction Timeline
How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.
-
Aug 21, 2026 · 17:03 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Gleisdorf 09 36.1% · Draw 29.7% · Kalsdorf 34.2%
- xG · Gleisdorf 09 1.32 — Kalsdorf 1.28
-
Aug 21, 2026 · 16:38 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Gleisdorf 09 2.83 · Draw 3.61 · Kalsdorf 2.02
- Implied 1X2 · Gleisdorf 09 31.4% · Draw 24.6% · Kalsdorf 44.0%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Aug 21, 2026 · 17:03 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Gleisdorf 09 2.83 · Draw 3.61 · Kalsdorf 2.02
- Implied 1X2 · Gleisdorf 09 31.4% · Draw 24.6% · Kalsdorf 44.0%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Aug 21, 2026 · 17:00 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Kalsdorf win · 1–2
-
FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Historical Snapshot
Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
- Validation: Pass
- No strong statistical edge
- Direction agrees with model lean
- Validation passed
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Review FAQ
- How accurate was the prediction?
- This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
- What does xG Accuracy measure?
- xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
- Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
- Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
- Does this improve the AI record?
- Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore More Predictions Content
Get Premium Predictions for Gleisdorf 09 & Kalsdorf!
Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.
Subscribe Now
Regionalliga - South — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Velden | 9 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 19 |
| 2 | Wolfsberger AC II | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| 2 | Austria Klagenfurt | 9 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 19 |
| 3 | Treibach | 9 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 17 |
| 4 | Kalsdorf | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 17 |
| 5 | Deutschlandsberger SC | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 17 |
| 6 | Völkermarkt | 9 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 14 |
| 7 | Weiz | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 13 |
| 8 | SV Lafnitz | 8 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 12 |
| 9 | Wolfsberger AC | 9 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 12 |
| 10 | Allerheiligen | 8 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 9 |
| 11 | Tillmitsch | 8 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 9 |
| 12 | Wolfsberg | 9 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 7 |
| 13 | Bleiburg | 9 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 6 |
| 14 | Hartberg (Am) | 8 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 5 |
| 15 | Gleisdorf 09 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 4 |
| 16 | Donau Klagenfurt | 9 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 3 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Deutschlandsberger SC | 8 | 18 | 11 | +7 | 17 |
| 2 | Austria Klagenfurt | 9 | 18 | 12 | +6 | 19 |
| 3 | Treibach | 9 | 17 | 9 | +8 | 17 |
| 4 | Velden | 9 | 16 | 7 | +9 | 19 |
| 5 | Kalsdorf | 8 | 16 | 8 | +8 | 17 |
| 6 | Völkermarkt | 9 | 16 | 9 | +7 | 14 |
| 7 | SV Lafnitz | 8 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 12 |
| 8 | Allerheiligen | 8 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 9 |
| 9 | Weiz | 8 | 15 | 10 | +5 | 13 |
| 10 | Wolfsberger AC | 9 | 14 | 15 | -1 | 12 |
| 11 | Tillmitsch | 8 | 14 | 16 | -2 | 9 |
| 12 | Bleiburg | 9 | 12 | 17 | -5 | 6 |
| 13 | Hartberg (Am) | 8 | 10 | 18 | -8 | 5 |
| 14 | Gleisdorf 09 | 8 | 8 | 18 | -10 | 4 |
| 15 | Donau Klagenfurt | 9 | 7 | 17 | -10 | 3 |
| 16 | Wolfsberg | 9 | 6 | 20 | -14 | 7 |
| 17 | Wolfsberger AC II | 2 | 4 | 2 | +2 | 4 |