Prediction Audit: Al-Faisaly FC vs Al-Hazm Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Al-Faisaly FC

Sep 05, 2026 - 15:50

0 1.37

0 1.52

xG Accuracy: 45%

Al-Hazm

The model missed the final outcome (Draw 0–0).

The model had projected Al-Hazm at 39.5%, but the full-time result went the other way.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Prediction grade F

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

Market Prediction Result Outcome
Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Under 2.5 (0 goals) ✖ Incorrect
Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
1X2 Al-Hazm Draw ✖ Incorrect
Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-2, 0-1, 2-1, 1-0 0-0 ✖ Incorrect

Model vs Closing Market

Outcome	Model	Closing Market	Difference	Signal
Al-Faisaly FC	32.8%	43.6%	-10.9 pp	Market Higher
Draw	27.8%	27.3%	+0.4 pp	Aligned
Al-Hazm	39.5%	29.0%	+10.5 pp	Model Edge

The closing market estimates Al-Faisaly FC's win probability at 43.6%, compared with the model's estimate of 32.8%, a difference of 10.9 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.

After full time, the result was Draw 0–0.

Market Assessment

The market is materially more optimistic about Al-Faisaly FC than the current fair estimate.

Investors may be incorporating information not fully reflected in the baseline model.
Tournament-specific context can shift market pricing.

Post Match Insights

What failed

Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS Yes; match finished BTTS No
Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Over 2.5; match finished Under 2.5 (0 goals)

Market lesson

The closing market differed from the model on Al-Hazm by 10.9 percentage points (50.4% vs model 39.5%) — in this case the market view proved closer.

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Prediction Timeline

How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.

Sep 05, 2026 · 15:49 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Al-Faisaly FC 32.8% · Draw 27.8% · Al-Hazm 39.5%
- xG · Al-Faisaly FC 1.37 — Al-Hazm 1.52
Sep 05, 2026 · 15:19 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Al-Faisaly FC 2.18 · Draw 3.48 · Al-Hazm 3.28
- Implied 1X2 · Al-Faisaly FC 43.6% · Draw 27.3% · Al-Hazm 29.0%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
Sep 05, 2026 · 15:49 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Al-Faisaly FC 2.18 · Draw 3.48 · Al-Hazm 3.28
- Implied 1X2 · Al-Faisaly FC 43.6% · Draw 27.3% · Al-Hazm 29.0%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
Sep 05, 2026 · 15:50 UTC Kickoff
FT Full-time result Draw · 0–0
FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
Archived Prediction review

Historical Snapshot

Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.

Historical verdict: Monitor

Historical Decision Monitor

Outcome Missed

Pre-match metrics (historical context)

Prediction Reliability 58/100 · Moderate

Validation: Warning
Large market gap (11 pp)

Evidence ★★★★★

No strong statistical edge
Market has already priced much of the edge
Validation warning

Pricing proximity (inverse gap) 15/100

Monitoring Confidence 20/100

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Aug 30, 2026 · 03:37 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-6160410

Closing Odds 2.18

AI Fair Odds —

CLV Pending

Final Result Draw · Al-Faisaly FC 0–0 Al-Hazm

Prediction ✖ Missed

Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Review FAQ

How accurate was the prediction?: This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
What does xG Accuracy measure?: xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
Why wasn't the exact score predicted?: Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
Does this improve the AI record?: Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Quick read on how the model reads this matchup.

League: Pro League
Fixture: Al-Faisaly FC vs Al-Hazm
Kickoff: 2026-09-05 15:50:00
1X2 (model): Home 32.8% · Draw 27.8% · Away 39.5%
xG (showing): Al-Faisaly FC 1.37 — Al-Hazm 1.52 (total xG ≈ 2.89)
Value headline: At least one tracked line reaches the headline EV threshold — align with the hero / Primary card if shown.
Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Over 2.5 (Under 2.5 44.8% · Over 2.5 55.2%); BTTS Yes (Yes 59.8% · No 40.2%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Over 2.5; BTTS Yes
BTTS (model): Yes 59.8% · No 40.2%
Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (11.6%)

Saying “no value” on a snapshot is a feature, not a bug: it protects readers from forcing a play when the edge is not there.

Prefer skipping to over-staking when the engine is honest about missing edge.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Monitor

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 28, 2026 (UTC)

Related Predictions

See Upcoming Pro League Matches Track Al-Faisaly FC Next Match Prediction Track Al-Hazm Next Match Prediction View Today's Football Predictions

Explore More Predictions Content

Get Premium Predictions for Al-Faisaly FC & Al-Hazm!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now

Back to Predictions

Pro League — Standings

#	TEAM	MP	W	D	L	PTS
1	Al-Hilal Saudi FC	7	6	0	1	18
2	Al-Ittihad FC	7	5	2	0	17
3	Al-Nassr	7	5	1	1	16
4	Al-Qadisiyah FC	7	5	1	1	16
5	NEOM	7	5	0	2	15
6	Al-Ahli Jeddah	7	4	0	3	12
7	Al Kholood	7	3	3	1	12
8	Al Diriyah	7	3	2	2	11
9	Al-Ettifaq	7	3	2	2	11
10	Al-Hazm	7	2	2	3	8
11	Al Riyadh	7	2	2	3	8
12	Al-Fayha	7	1	3	3	6
13	Al Khaleej Saihat	7	0	5	2	5
14	Al Shabab	7	0	4	3	4
15	Al-Fateh	7	0	3	4	3
16	Al-Faisaly FC	7	0	3	4	3
17	Al Taawon	7	0	3	4	3
18	Abha	7	0	2	5	2

#	TEAM	MP	GS	GC	+/-	PTS
1	Al-Hilal Saudi FC	7	23	5	+18	18
2	Al-Nassr	7	16	7	+9	16
3	Al-Qadisiyah FC	7	16	8	+8	16
4	Al-Ahli Jeddah	7	16	10	+6	12
5	NEOM	7	13	6	+7	15
6	Al-Ittihad FC	7	12	6	+6	17
7	Al Kholood	7	12	10	+2	12
8	Al-Ettifaq	7	11	11	0	11
9	Al Riyadh	7	8	16	-8	8
10	Al Diriyah	7	7	5	+2	11
11	Al-Hazm	7	7	9	-2	8
12	Al-Fayha	7	7	11	-4	6
13	Al Shabab	7	6	11	-5	4
14	Al-Faisaly FC	7	5	13	-8	3
15	Abha	7	5	13	-8	2
16	Al-Fateh	7	4	11	-7	3
17	Al Khaleej Saihat	7	3	10	-7	5
18	Al Taawon	7	3	12	-9	3

#	TEAM	MP	xG	xGC	+/-	PTS
1	Al-Hilal Saudi FC	7	13.7	4.9	+8.8	18
2	Al-Qadisiyah FC	7	9.1	3.6	+5.5	16
3	Al-Nassr	7	8.4	3.0	+5.4	16
4	Al Kholood	7	10.9	7.3	+3.6	12
5	Al-Ahli Jeddah	7	4.2	2.4	+1.8	12
6	Al-Ittihad FC	7	8.1	6.4	+1.7	17
7	Al-Ettifaq	7	6.7	5.7	+1.0	11
8	Al Diriyah	7	3.7	2.9	+0.8	11
9	Al Taawon	7	5.8	5.4	+0.4	3
10	NEOM	7	6.0	6.1	-0.1	15
11	Al Shabab	7	6.8	7.6	-0.8	4
12	Al-Fateh	7	4.5	6.9	-2.4	3
13	Al-Hazm	7	3.3	6.0	-2.7	8
14	Al Khaleej Saihat	7	4.2	7.2	-3.0	5
15	Abha	7	4.4	8.2	-3.8	2
16	Al Riyadh	7	3.4	8.5	-5.1	8
17	Al-Faisaly FC	7	4.5	9.7	-5.2	3
18	Al-Fayha	7	5.0	10.8	-5.8	6