Predictions / Football / Italy. Serie B / Benevento vs Sudtirol

Prediction Audit: Benevento vs Sudtirol Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Benevento Benevento
Aug 30, 2026 - 19:00
1 1.23
1 1.02
xG Accuracy: 93%
Sudtirol Sudtirol

The model missed the final outcome (Draw 1–1).

The model had projected Benevento at 41.7%, but the full-time result went the other way.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Prediction grade F

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (2 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS No Yes ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 Benevento Draw ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 0-0, 2-1 1-1 ✔ Correct

Model vs Closing Market

Moderate Disagreement

The closing market prices Benevento higher than the statistical model.

Largest probability gap: Benevento -6.4 pp

Outcome Model Closing Market Difference Signal
Benevento 41.7% 48.1% -6.4 pp Market Higher
Draw 31.2% 29.7% +1.6 pp Aligned
Sudtirol 27.0% 22.2% +4.8 pp Aligned

The closing market estimates Benevento's win probability at 48.1%, compared with the model's estimate of 41.7%, a difference of 6.4 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE5.

After full time, the result was Draw 1–1.

Market Assessment

The market and model broadly agree on Benevento. The remaining divergence may reflect differences in team-strength assumptions rather than a directional disagreement.

  • Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.

Post Match Insights

What worked

  • Under 2.5 goals aligned with the xG profile
  • Exact score 1–1 fell within the model's highlighted bins

What failed

  • Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS No; match finished BTTS Yes
  • 1X2: model leaned Benevento; match finished Draw

Market lesson

The closing market differed from the model on Benevento by 6.4 percentage points (48.1% vs model 41.7%) — in this case the market view proved closer.

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Prediction Timeline

How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.

  1. Aug 30, 2026 · 19:49 UTC Forecast generated
    • Model 1X2 · Benevento 41.7% · Draw 31.3% · Sudtirol 27.0%
    • xG · Benevento 1.23 — Sudtirol 1.02
  2. Aug 30, 2026 · 18:33 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
    • 1X2 odds · Benevento 2.01 · Draw 3.26 · Sudtirol 4.36
    • Implied 1X2 · Benevento 48.1% · Draw 29.7% · Sudtirol 22.2%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  3. Aug 30, 2026 · 18:57 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE5
    • 1X2 odds · Benevento 2.01 · Draw 3.26 · Sudtirol 4.36
    • Implied 1X2 · Benevento 48.1% · Draw 29.7% · Sudtirol 22.2%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  4. Aug 30, 2026 · 19:00 UTC Kickoff
  5. FT Full-time result Draw · 1–1
  6. FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
  7. Archived Prediction review

Historical Snapshot

Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.

Historical verdict: Observe
Historical Decision No Primary Bet
Outcome Missed
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
Prediction Reliability 76/100 · High
  • Validation: Pass
Evidence ★★★★★
  • No strong statistical edge
  • Direction agrees with model lean
  • Validation passed
Pricing proximity (inverse gap) 68/100
Betting Confidence 79/100

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Aug 24, 2026 · 02:40 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-5304047

Closing Odds 2.01
AI Fair Odds —
CLV Pending
Final Result Draw · Benevento 1–1 Sudtirol
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Review FAQ

How accurate was the prediction?
This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
What does xG Accuracy measure?
xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
Does this improve the AI record?
Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

  • League: Serie B
  • Fixture: Benevento vs Sudtirol
  • Kickoff: 2026-08-30 19:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 41.7% · Draw 31.3% · Away 27.0%
  • xG (showing): Benevento 1.23 — Sudtirol 1.02 (total xG ≈ 2.25)
  • Value headline: None (actionable) — best tracked EV is about +0.7%, still below the +2.0% minimum for a headline / default stake (no default bet).
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 60.9% · Over 2.5 39.1%); BTTS No (Yes 47.0% · No 53.0%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS No
  • BTTS (model): Yes 47.0% · No 53.0%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (13.2%)

When book depth is thin or odds are missing, EV may be unavailable even though the model still prefers one side on totals or BTTS — wait for cleaner prices or skip.

Most likely correct score stays a low-probability tail: use it for context, not as a must-bet story.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: No Primary Bet

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 29, 2026 (UTC)

Related Predictions

See Upcoming Serie B Matches Track Benevento Next Match Prediction Track Sudtirol Next Match Prediction View Today's Football Predictions

Get Premium Predictions for Benevento & Sudtirol!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Predictions
Serie B Serie B — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Palermo 5 4 1 0 13
2 Sudtirol 5 3 2 0 11
3 Mantova 5 3 2 0 11
4 Modena 5 3 1 1 10
5 Ascoli 5 3 1 1 10
6 Padova 5 2 1 2 7
7 Benevento 5 2 1 2 7
8 Verona 5 2 1 2 7
9 Avellino 5 2 1 2 7
10 Cesena 5 1 4 0 7
11 Pisa 5 2 1 2 7
12 Arezzo 5 2 0 3 6
13 Empoli 5 2 0 3 6
14 Virtus Entella 5 1 2 2 5
15 Cremonese 5 1 2 2 5
16 Vicenza Virtus 5 1 2 2 5
17 Sampdoria 5 1 1 3 4
18 Juve Stabia 5 1 2 2 3
19 Catanzaro 5 1 0 4 3
20 Carrarese 5 0 1 4 1
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Palermo 5 10 5 +5 13
2 Mantova 5 10 5 +5 11
3 Verona 5 10 7 +3 7
4 Sudtirol 5 9 3 +6 11
5 Modena 5 8 4 +4 10
6 Pisa 5 8 8 0 7
7 Ascoli 5 7 4 +3 10
8 Avellino 5 7 6 +1 7
9 Cesena 5 7 6 +1 7
10 Virtus Entella 5 7 6 +1 5
11 Vicenza Virtus 5 7 10 -3 5
12 Benevento 5 6 5 +1 7
13 Arezzo 5 6 13 -7 6
14 Padova 5 5 6 -1 7
15 Cremonese 5 5 7 -2 5
16 Sampdoria 5 5 9 -4 4
17 Catanzaro 5 5 9 -4 3
18 Empoli 5 4 6 -2 6
19 Juve Stabia 5 4 7 -3 3
20 Carrarese 5 2 6 -4 1
# TEAM MP xG xGC +/- PTS
1 Verona 5 4.8 2.2 +2.6 7
2 Modena 5 3.2 1.3 +1.9 10
3 Benevento 5 2.8 1.1 +1.7 7
4 Pisa 5 3.7 2.2 +1.5 7
5 Palermo 5 3.2 2.2 +1.0 13
6 Cesena 5 3.0 2.1 +0.9 7
7 Mantova 5 2.9 2.6 +0.3 11
8 Sampdoria 5 2.3 2.3 0.0 4
9 Carrarese 5 2.7 2.8 -0.1 1
10 Vicenza Virtus 5 2.9 3.1 -0.2 5
11 Arezzo 5 2.5 2.7 -0.2 6
12 Empoli 5 1.4 1.6 -0.2 6
13 Virtus Entella 5 1.2 1.4 -0.2 5
14 Juve Stabia 5 2.1 2.4 -0.3 3
15 Cremonese 5 0.7 1.6 -0.9 5
16 Catanzaro 5 2.8 3.8 -1.0 3
17 Padova 5 2.0 3.3 -1.3 7
18 Sudtirol 5 1.5 2.8 -1.3 11
19 Avellino 5 2.5 4.4 -1.9 7
20 Ascoli 5 2.9 4.9 -2.0 10