Predictions / Football / El-Salvador. Primera Division / Isidro Metapán vs Cacahuatique

Prediction Audit: Isidro Metapán vs Cacahuatique Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Sep 27, 2026 - 02:00
2 1.26
0 1.34
xG Accuracy: 56%

The model missed the final outcome (Isidro Metapán win 2–0).

The model had projected Cacahuatique at 37.1%, but the full-time result went the other way.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Prediction grade F

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (2 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 Cacahuatique Isidro Metapán ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 2-0 ✖ Incorrect

Model vs Closing Market

Strong Disagreement

The closing market prices Isidro Metapán higher than the statistical model.

Largest probability gap: Isidro Metapán -31.1 pp

Outcome Model Closing Market Difference Signal
Isidro Metapán 33.3% 64.4% -31.1 pp Market Higher
Draw 29.6% 22.5% +7.1 pp Model Higher
Cacahuatique 37.1% 13.0% +24.0 pp Model Edge

The closing market estimates Isidro Metapán's win probability at 64.4%, compared with the model's estimate of 33.3%, a difference of 31.1 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.

After full time, the result was Isidro Metapán win 2–0.

Post Match Insights

What worked

  • Under 2.5 goals aligned with the xG profile

What failed

  • Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS Yes; match finished BTTS No
  • 1X2: model leaned Cacahuatique; match finished Isidro Metapán

Market lesson

The closing market differed from the model on Cacahuatique by 31.1 percentage points (68.2% vs model 37.1%) — in this case the market view proved closer.

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Prediction Timeline

How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.

  1. Sep 27, 2026 · 01:59 UTC Forecast generated
    • Model 1X2 · Isidro Metapán 33.4% · Draw 29.6% · Cacahuatique 37.0%
    • xG · Isidro Metapán 1.26 — Cacahuatique 1.34
  2. Sep 27, 2026 · 01:29 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
    • 1X2 odds · Isidro Metapán 1.42 · Draw 4.06 · Cacahuatique 7.03
    • Implied 1X2 · Isidro Metapán 64.4% · Draw 22.5% · Cacahuatique 13.0%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  3. Sep 27, 2026 · 01:59 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
    • 1X2 odds · Isidro Metapán 1.42 · Draw 4.06 · Cacahuatique 7.03
    • Implied 1X2 · Isidro Metapán 64.4% · Draw 22.5% · Cacahuatique 13.0%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  4. Sep 27, 2026 · 02:00 UTC Kickoff
  5. FT Full-time result Isidro Metapán win · 2–0
  6. FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
  7. Archived Prediction review

Historical Snapshot

Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.

Historical verdict: Cautious / Wait

Historical label: Originally displayed as "Wait for validation".

Historical Decision Wait
Outcome Missed
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
Prediction Reliability 33/100 · Low
  • Validation: Fail
  • Large market gap (31 pp)
Evidence ★★★★★
  • No strong statistical edge
  • Market strongly disagrees on price
  • Validation failed
Pricing proximity (inverse gap) 0/100
Monitoring Confidence 9/100

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Sep 21, 2026 · 00:47 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-10078799

Closing Odds 1.42
AI Fair Odds —
CLV Pending
Final Result Isidro Metapán win · Isidro Metapán 2–0 Cacahuatique
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Review FAQ

How accurate was the prediction?
This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
What does xG Accuracy measure?
xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
Does this improve the AI record?
Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Model favours Cacahuatique; market prices Isidro Metapán instead — inputs may be missing or stale.

  • Model: Isidro Metapán 1.26 xG vs Cacahuatique 1.34 → Cacahuatique 37.1%
  • Market: Isidro Metapán ~13.0% implied
  • Validation failed — do not treat 1X2 EV as actionable.

Do not act on 1X2 value until validation passes. Structural leans (O/U, BTTS) need separate odds review.

Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 51.8% · Over 2.5 48.2%); BTTS Yes (Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS Yes

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Wait

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 30, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Isidro Metapán & Cacahuatique!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Predictions
Primera Division Primera Division — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 FAS 10 6 2 2 20
2 Inter 11 5 5 1 20
3 Isidro Metapán 11 6 2 3 20
4 Firpo 10 5 3 2 18
5 Municipal Limeño 11 5 2 4 17
6 Águila 11 3 5 3 14
7 Alianza 9 3 4 2 13
8 Atletico Balboa 11 3 3 5 12
9 Platense 11 3 3 5 12
10 Inca Aruba 11 3 2 6 11
11 Cacahuatique 11 1 5 5 8
12 Fuerte San Francisco 11 1 4 6 7
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 FAS 10 18 9 +9 20
2 Firpo 10 16 7 +9 18
3 Inter 11 16 8 +8 20
4 Municipal Limeño 11 16 12 +4 17
5 Águila 11 16 14 +2 14
6 Isidro Metapán 11 15 10 +5 20
7 Alianza 9 14 13 +1 13
8 Atletico Balboa 11 12 16 -4 12
9 Platense 11 12 16 -4 12
10 Cacahuatique 11 11 18 -7 8
11 Fuerte San Francisco 11 8 19 -11 7
12 Inca Aruba 11 8 20 -12 11