Predictions / Football / World. Friendlies Clubs / Leeds vs FC Augsburg

Prediction Audit: Leeds vs FC Augsburg Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Leeds Leeds
Aug 15, 2026 - 14:00
4 1.26
0 1.34
xG Accuracy: 33%
FC Augsburg FC Augsburg

The model missed the final outcome (Leeds win 4–0).

The model had projected FC Augsburg at 37.2%, but the full-time result went the other way.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Prediction grade F

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (4 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 FC Augsburg Leeds ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 4-0 ✖ Incorrect

Model vs Closing Market

Strong Disagreement

The closing market prices Leeds higher than the statistical model.

Largest probability gap: Leeds -21.0 pp

Outcome Model Closing Market Difference Signal
Leeds 33.4% 54.4% -21.0 pp Market Higher
Draw 29.4% 23.7% +5.7 pp Model Higher
FC Augsburg 37.2% 21.9% +15.3 pp Model Edge

The closing market estimates Leeds's win probability at 54.4%, compared with the model's estimate of 33.4%, a difference of 21.0 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.

After full time, the result was Leeds win 4–0.

Post Match Insights

What worked

  • Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.60) — 4 goals materialised

What failed

  • Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS Yes; match finished BTTS No
  • Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (4 goals)

Market lesson

The closing market differed from the model on FC Augsburg by 21.0 percentage points (58.2% vs model 37.2%) — in this case the market view proved closer.

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Prediction Timeline

How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.

  1. Aug 15, 2026 · 13:59 UTC Forecast generated
    • Model 1X2 · Leeds 33.4% · Draw 29.4% · FC Augsburg 37.2%
    • xG · Leeds 1.26 — FC Augsburg 1.34
  2. Aug 15, 2026 · 13:32 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
    • 1X2 odds · Leeds 1.68 · Draw 3.86 · FC Augsburg 4.18
    • Implied 1X2 · Leeds 54.4% · Draw 23.7% · FC Augsburg 21.9%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  3. Aug 15, 2026 · 13:59 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
    • 1X2 odds · Leeds 1.68 · Draw 3.86 · FC Augsburg 4.18
    • Implied 1X2 · Leeds 54.4% · Draw 23.7% · FC Augsburg 21.9%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  4. Aug 15, 2026 · 14:00 UTC Kickoff
  5. FT Full-time result Leeds win · 4–0
  6. FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
  7. Archived Prediction review

Historical Snapshot

Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.

Historical verdict: Cautious / Wait

Historical label: Originally displayed as "Wait for validation".

Historical Decision Wait
Outcome Missed
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
Prediction Reliability 53/100 · Moderate
  • Validation: Warning
  • Large market gap (21 pp)
Evidence ★★★★★
  • No strong statistical edge
  • Pricing remains divergent
  • Validation warning
Pricing proximity (inverse gap) 0/100
Monitoring Confidence 15/100

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Aug 09, 2026 · 01:52 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-3348794

Closing Odds 1.68
AI Fair Odds —
CLV Pending
Final Result Leeds win · Leeds 4–0 FC Augsburg
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Review FAQ

How accurate was the prediction?
This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
What does xG Accuracy measure?
xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
Does this improve the AI record?
Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Quick read on how the model reads this matchup.

  • League: Friendlies Clubs
  • Fixture: Leeds vs FC Augsburg
  • Kickoff: 2026-08-15 14:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 33.4% · Draw 29.4% · Away 37.2%
  • xG (showing): Leeds 1.26 — FC Augsburg 1.34 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Value headline: None (actionable) — best tracked EV is about +1.3%, still below the +2.0% minimum for a headline / default stake (no default bet).
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 51.8% · Over 2.5 48.2%); BTTS Yes (Yes 54.4% · No 45.6%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS Yes
  • BTTS (model): Yes 54.4% · No 45.6%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.5%)

The decision block shows no default Primary: Primary needs consensus EV ≥ +5.0% plus strength/reliability/calibration gates. A separate Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only). Lean labels are directional only — not bankroll-sized recommendations.

If lines move materially, re-run generation or refresh — implied probabilities and any future EV readouts will change first.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Wait

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

October 02, 2026 (UTC)

Related Predictions

See Upcoming Friendlies Clubs Matches Track Leeds Next Match Prediction Track FC Augsburg Next Match Prediction View Today's Football Predictions

Get Premium Predictions for Leeds & FC Augsburg!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Predictions
Friendlies Clubs World. Friendlies Clubs Predictions