Prediction Audit: Bury vs Curzon Ashton Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Bury

Aug 11, 2026 - 18:45

3 1.32

2 1.28

xG Accuracy: 52%

Curzon Ashton

AI correctly predicted the Bury win.

The match finished 3–2, validating the model's directional assessment.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Prediction grade B-

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

Market Prediction Result Outcome
Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (5 goals) ✖ Incorrect
Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
1X2 Bury Bury ✔ Correct
Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 3-2 ✖ Incorrect

Model vs Closing Market

Outcome	Model	Closing Market	Difference	Signal
Bury	36.1%	44.1%	-8.0 pp	Market Higher
Draw	29.6%	26.7%	+3.0 pp	Aligned
Curzon Ashton	34.2%	29.2%	+5.1 pp	Model Higher

The closing market estimates Bury's win probability at 44.1%, compared with the model's estimate of 36.1%, a difference of 8.0 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.

After full time, the model's directional lean matched the result (Bury win 3–2).

Market Assessment

The market and model broadly agree on Bury. The remaining divergence may reflect differences in team-strength assumptions rather than a directional disagreement.

Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.

Post Match Insights

What worked

Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.60) — 5 goals materialised
Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result

What failed

Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (5 goals)
Exact score: outside the model's top score bins

Market lesson

Large model–market gaps do not automatically mean the market is right. Here the closing market priced Bury higher (44.1% vs model 36.1%, 8.0 pp), but the model's lean was validated (Bury win 3–2).

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Prediction Timeline

How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.

Aug 11, 2026 · 18:48 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Bury 36.1% · Draw 29.7% · Curzon Ashton 34.2%
- xG · Bury 1.32 — Curzon Ashton 1.28
Aug 11, 2026 · 18:18 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Bury 2.05 · Draw 3.39 · Curzon Ashton 3.10
- Implied 1X2 · Bury 44.1% · Draw 26.7% · Curzon Ashton 29.2%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
Aug 11, 2026 · 18:48 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Bury 2.05 · Draw 3.39 · Curzon Ashton 3.10
- Implied 1X2 · Bury 44.1% · Draw 26.7% · Curzon Ashton 29.2%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
Aug 11, 2026 · 18:45 UTC Kickoff
FT Full-time result Bury win · 3–2
FT Prediction validated Directional lean matched full-time result
Archived Prediction review

Historical Snapshot

Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.

Historical verdict: Observe

Historical Decision No Primary Bet

Outcome Validated

Pre-match metrics (historical context)

Prediction Reliability 75/100 · High

Validation: Pass

Evidence ★★★★★

No strong statistical edge
Direction agrees with model lean
Validation passed

Pricing proximity (inverse gap) 59/100

Betting Confidence 78/100

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Aug 05, 2026 · 02:29 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-3020228

Closing Odds 2.05

AI Fair Odds —

CLV Pending

Final Result Bury win · Bury 3–2 Curzon Ashton

Prediction ✔ Correct

Decision Grade B-

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Review FAQ

How accurate was the prediction?: This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
What does xG Accuracy measure?: xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
Why wasn't the exact score predicted?: Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
Does this improve the AI record?: Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

League: Non League Premier - Northern
Fixture: Bury vs Curzon Ashton
Kickoff: 2026-08-11 18:45:00
1X2 (model): Home 36.1% · Draw 29.7% · Away 34.2%
xG (showing): Bury 1.32 — Curzon Ashton 1.28 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
Value headline: None — no positive EV on tracked lines at current best prices (same as the decision block: no default bet).
Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 51.8% · Over 2.5 48.2%); BTTS Yes (Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS Yes
BTTS (model): Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%
Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.5%)

Saying “no value” on a snapshot is a feature, not a bug: it protects readers from forcing a play when the edge is not there.

If lines move materially, re-run generation or refresh — implied probabilities and any future EV readouts will change first.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: No Primary Bet

Outcome: Validated — Pre-match lean validated against the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

October 02, 2026 (UTC)

Related Predictions

See Upcoming Non League Premier - Northern Matches Track Bury Next Match Prediction Track Curzon Ashton Next Match Prediction View Today's Football Predictions

Explore More Predictions Content

Get Premium Predictions for Bury & Curzon Ashton!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now

Back to Predictions

Non League Premier - Northern — Standings

#	TEAM	MP	W	D	L	PTS
1	Cleethorpes Town	10	7	2	1	23
2	Avro	9	7	1	1	22
3	Redcar Athletic	10	6	4	0	22
4	Guiseley AFC	9	6	1	2	19
5	Warrington Town	9	5	2	2	17
6	Bury	9	5	1	3	16
7	Curzon Ashton	9	5	1	3	16
8	Workington	9	5	1	3	16
9	Gainsborough Trinity	9	4	1	4	13
10	Rylands	9	4	1	4	13
11	Alfreton Town	9	4	0	5	12
12	Whitby Town	9	4	0	5	12
13	Ashton United	9	3	2	4	11
14	Hyde United	10	3	2	5	11
15	AFC Emley	9	2	4	3	10
16	Lancaster City	9	3	1	5	10
17	Leek Town	10	2	3	5	9
18	Bamber Bridge	10	2	3	5	9
19	Stockton Town	10	2	2	6	8
20	Ilkeston Town	9	2	1	6	7
21	Quorn	9	1	3	5	6
22	United of Manchester	9	1	2	6	5

#	TEAM	MP	GS	GC	+/-	PTS
1	Avro	9	28	16	+12	22
2	Cleethorpes Town	10	25	6	+19	23
3	Guiseley AFC	9	22	10	+12	19
4	Redcar Athletic	10	19	7	+12	22
5	Bury	9	19	8	+11	16
6	Leek Town	10	19	20	-1	9
7	Curzon Ashton	9	18	10	+8	16
8	Warrington Town	9	18	14	+4	17
9	Workington	9	17	15	+2	16
10	Alfreton Town	9	15	10	+5	12
11	Gainsborough Trinity	9	14	12	+2	13
12	Whitby Town	9	14	24	-10	12
13	Bamber Bridge	10	14	27	-13	9
14	Stockton Town	10	13	20	-7	8
15	Rylands	9	12	13	-1	13
16	United of Manchester	9	12	19	-7	5
17	Quorn	9	12	23	-11	6
18	Hyde United	10	11	19	-8	11
19	Ashton United	9	10	9	+1	11
20	Lancaster City	9	9	17	-8	10
21	AFC Emley	9	8	15	-7	10
22	Ilkeston Town	9	6	21	-15	7