Prediction Audit: Tersana vs Baladiyyat Al Mehalla Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Tersana

Sep 25, 2026 - 13:30

1 1.28

1 1.32

xG Accuracy: 85%

Baladiyyat Al Mehalla

The model missed the final outcome (Draw 1–1).

The model had projected Baladiyyat Al Mehalla at 36.1%, but the full-time result went the other way.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Prediction grade F

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

Market Prediction Result Outcome
Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Under 2.5 (2 goals) ✖ Incorrect
Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
1X2 Baladiyyat Al Mehalla Draw ✖ Incorrect
Correct Score Insights 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 1-1 ✔ Correct

Model vs Closing Market

Outcome	Model	Closing Market	Difference	Signal
Tersana	34.2%	37.4%	-3.1 pp	Aligned
Draw	29.6%	38.5%	-8.8 pp	Market Higher
Baladiyyat Al Mehalla	36.1%	24.2%	+11.9 pp	Model Edge

The statistical model estimates Baladiyyat Al Mehalla's win probability at 36.1%, compared with the closing market's implied probability of 24.2%, a difference of 11.9 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model's assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.

After full time, the result was Draw 1–1.

Market Assessment

The statistical fair estimate is materially higher than the market on Baladiyyat Al Mehalla.

The model may see a slower-scoring or closer matchup than the market.
Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.

Post Match Insights

What worked

Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
Exact score 1–1 fell within the model's highlighted bins

What failed

Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Over 2.5; match finished Under 2.5 (2 goals)
1X2: model leaned Baladiyyat Al Mehalla; match finished Draw

Market lesson

The closing market differed from the model on Baladiyyat Al Mehalla by 11.9 percentage points (24.2% vs model 36.1%) — in this case the market view proved closer.

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Prediction Timeline

How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.

Sep 25, 2026 · 13:29 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Tersana 34.2% · Draw 29.7% · Baladiyyat Al Mehalla 36.1%
- xG · Tersana 1.28 — Baladiyyat Al Mehalla 1.32
Sep 25, 2026 · 13:01 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Tersana 2.45 · Draw 2.38 · Baladiyyat Al Mehalla 3.78
- Implied 1X2 · Tersana 37.4% · Draw 38.5% · Baladiyyat Al Mehalla 24.2%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
Sep 25, 2026 · 13:29 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Tersana 2.45 · Draw 2.38 · Baladiyyat Al Mehalla 3.78
- Implied 1X2 · Tersana 37.4% · Draw 38.5% · Baladiyyat Al Mehalla 24.2%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
Sep 25, 2026 · 13:30 UTC Kickoff
FT Full-time result Draw · 1–1
FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
Archived Prediction review

Historical Snapshot

Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.

Historical verdict: Monitor

Historical Decision Monitor

Outcome Missed

Pre-match metrics (historical context)

Prediction Reliability 57/100 · Moderate

Validation: Warning
Large market gap (12 pp)

Evidence ★★★★★

Statistical edge detected
Market has already priced much of the edge
Validation warning

Pricing proximity (inverse gap) 14/100

Monitoring Confidence 20/100

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Sep 19, 2026 · 00:51 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-9562878

Closing Odds 3.78

AI Fair Odds —

CLV Pending

Final Result Draw · Tersana 1–1 Baladiyyat Al Mehalla

Prediction ✖ Missed

Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Review FAQ

How accurate was the prediction?: This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
What does xG Accuracy measure?: xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
Why wasn't the exact score predicted?: Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
Does this improve the AI record?: Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

League: Second League
Fixture: Tersana vs Baladiyyat Al Mehalla
Kickoff: 2026-09-25 13:30:00
1X2 (model): Home 34.2% · Draw 29.7% · Away 36.1%
xG (showing): Tersana 1.28 — Baladiyyat Al Mehalla 1.32 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
Best +EV line (same label as hero card when Primary thresholds are not met): Over 2.5 goals
Model: 48.2% · Implied: 32.7% · Probability edge: +15.5 pts · Est. EV: +45.1%
BTTS (model): Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%
Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.5%)

Use the cards for tiering; this text only restates the same inputs in narrative form.

Early match state can move realised goals away from pre-kick projections.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Monitor

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 30, 2026 (UTC)

Related Predictions

See Upcoming Second League Matches Track Tersana Next Match Prediction Track Baladiyyat Al Mehalla Next Match Prediction View Today's Football Predictions

Explore More Predictions Content

Get Premium Predictions for Tersana & Baladiyyat Al Mehalla!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now

Back to Predictions

Second League — Standings

#	TEAM	MP	W	D	L	PTS
1	Masar	6	5	1	0	16
2	Maleyet Kafr El Zayiat	6	4	2	0	14
3	Kahraba Ismailia	6	4	1	1	13
4	Haras El Hodood	5	4	1	0	13
5	Pharco	6	4	1	1	13
6	AL Nasr SC	6	2	3	1	9
7	Itesalat	5	3	0	2	9
8	Tersana	5	2	2	1	8
9	El Mansura	6	2	2	2	8
10	Team	6	2	1	3	7
11	Tanta SC	5	2	1	2	7
12	El Seka El Hadid	6	2	1	3	7
13	El Entag EL Harby	5	1	3	1	6
14	El Dakhleya	6	1	3	2	6
15	Baladiyyat Al Mehalla	5	1	1	3	4
16	La Viena FC	5	0	3	2	3
17	Proxy	6	1	0	5	3
18	Mega Sport	5	0	2	3	2
19	Ismaily SC	5	0	2	3	2
20	Dayrout	5	0	0	5	0

#	TEAM	MP	GS	GC	+/-	PTS
1	Masar	6	13	3	+10	16
2	Kahraba Ismailia	6	11	4	+7	13
3	Maleyet Kafr El Zayiat	6	8	2	+6	14
4	Haras El Hodood	5	8	2	+6	13
5	Pharco	6	8	5	+3	13
6	AL Nasr SC	6	7	4	+3	9
7	Itesalat	5	7	5	+2	9
8	El Entag EL Harby	5	7	5	+2	6
9	El Mansura	6	6	7	-1	8
10	Team	6	6	7	-1	7
11	El Seka El Hadid	6	6	9	-3	7
12	Tersana	5	4	4	0	8
13	Tanta SC	5	4	5	-1	7
14	Ismaily SC	5	4	9	-5	2
15	Baladiyyat Al Mehalla	5	3	5	-2	4
16	La Viena FC	5	3	5	-2	3
17	El Dakhleya	6	3	6	-3	6
18	Mega Sport	5	3	6	-3	2
19	Proxy	6	2	7	-5	3
20	Dayrout	5	0	13	-13	0