Predictions / Football / Lebanon. Premier League / Al Ansar vs Al Nejmeh

Prediction Audit: Al Ansar vs Al Nejmeh Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Jul 20, 2026 - 18:30
1 1.32
1 1.14
xG Accuracy: 88%

The model missed the final outcome (Draw 1–1).

The model had projected Al Ansar at 40.0%, but the full-time result went the other way.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Prediction grade C

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (2 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 Al Ansar Draw ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 0-0, 2-1 1-1 ✔ Correct

Model vs Closing Market

Broadly Aligned

The model and closing market are broadly aligned.

Largest probability gap: Al Ansar -1.6 pp

Outcome Model Closing Market Difference Signal
Al Ansar 40.0% 41.5% -1.6 pp Aligned
Draw 29.7% 28.2% +1.5 pp Aligned
Al Nejmeh 30.3% 30.2% +0.1 pp Aligned

The model and closing market are broadly aligned, with probability differences below 5 percentage points.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.

After full time, the result was Draw 1–1.

Market Assessment

The market and model are broadly aligned. Any small pricing gap likely reflects rounding or bookmaker margin, not a structural disagreement.

  • Current pricing remains close to the model baseline.

Post Match Insights

What worked

  • Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
  • Under 2.5 goals aligned with the xG profile
  • Exact score 1–1 fell within the model's highlighted bins

What failed

  • 1X2: model leaned Al Ansar; match finished Draw

Market lesson

The full-time result was Draw 1–1, which did not match the model's pre-match lean on 1X2.

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Prediction Timeline

How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.

  1. Jul 20, 2026 · 19:20 UTC Forecast generated
    • Model 1X2 · Al Ansar 40.0% · Draw 29.7% · Al Nejmeh 30.3%
    • xG · Al Ansar 1.32 — Al Nejmeh 1.14
  2. Jul 20, 2026 · 17:59 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
    • 1X2 odds · Al Ansar 2.14 · Draw 3.15 · Al Nejmeh 2.94
    • Implied 1X2 · Al Ansar 41.5% · Draw 28.2% · Al Nejmeh 30.2%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  3. Jul 20, 2026 · 18:29 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
    • 1X2 odds · Al Ansar 2.14 · Draw 3.15 · Al Nejmeh 2.94
    • Implied 1X2 · Al Ansar 41.5% · Draw 28.2% · Al Nejmeh 30.2%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  4. Jul 20, 2026 · 18:30 UTC Kickoff
  5. FT Full-time result Draw · 1–1
  6. FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
  7. Archived Prediction review

Historical Snapshot

Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.

Historical verdict: Observe
Historical Decision No Primary Bet
Outcome Missed
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
Prediction Reliability 78/100 · High
  • Validation: Pass
Evidence ★★★★★
  • No strong statistical edge
  • Direction agrees with model lean
  • Validation passed
Market Compatibility 92/100
Betting Confidence 81/100

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Jul 24, 2026 · 14:52 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-1608123

Closing Odds 2.14
AI Fair Odds —
CLV Pending
Final Result Draw · Al Ansar 1–1 Al Nejmeh
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade C

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Review FAQ

How accurate was the prediction?
This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
What does xG Accuracy measure?
xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
Does this improve the AI record?
Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

  • League: Premier League
  • Fixture: Al Ansar vs Al Nejmeh
  • Kickoff: 2026-07-20 18:30:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 40.0% · Draw 29.7% · Away 30.3%
  • xG (showing): Al Ansar 1.32 — Al Nejmeh 1.14 (total xG ≈ 2.46)
  • Value headline: None — no positive EV on tracked lines at current best prices (same as the decision block: no default bet).
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 55.4% · Over 2.5 44.6%); BTTS Yes (Yes 51.5% · No 48.5%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS Yes
  • BTTS (model): Yes 51.5% · No 48.5%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.9%)

The decision block shows no default Primary: Primary needs consensus EV ≥ +5.0% plus strength/reliability/calibration gates. A separate Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only). Lean labels are directional only — not bankroll-sized recommendations.

If lines move materially, re-run generation or refresh — implied probabilities and any future EV readouts will change first.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: No Primary Bet

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 30, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Al Ansar & Al Nejmeh!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Predictions
Premier League Premier League — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Al Ansar 21 17 2 2 53
2 Al Nejmeh 21 14 4 3 46
3 Al Ahed 21 13 1 7 40
4 Jwaaya FC 21 11 5 5 38
5 Safa 21 11 3 7 36
6 Al Hikma 21 9 3 9 30
7 Shabab Al Sahel 21 7 6 8 27
8 Al Mabarrah 21 5 7 9 22
9 Reyady Abaseya 21 5 5 11 20
10 Tadamon Sour 21 3 8 10 17
11 Bourj 11 3 1 7 10
12 Racing 21 0 1 20 1
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Al Ansar 21 53 9 +44 53
2 Al Nejmeh 21 42 10 +32 46
3 Al Ahed 21 34 22 +12 40
4 Jwaaya FC 21 31 14 +17 38
5 Safa 21 30 17 +13 36
6 Al Hikma 21 29 27 +2 30
7 Shabab Al Sahel 21 22 21 +1 27
8 Reyady Abaseya 21 16 30 -14 20
9 Tadamon Sour 21 12 26 -14 17
10 Al Mabarrah 21 12 36 -24 22
11 Bourj 11 8 20 -12 10
12 Racing 21 4 61 -57 1