Prediction Audit: Maidenhead vs Torquay Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Sep 08, 2026 - 18:45
0 1.32
4 1.28
xG Accuracy: 33%

The model missed the final outcome (Torquay win 0–4).

The model had projected Maidenhead at 36.1%, but the full-time result went the other way.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Prediction grade F

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (4 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS No No ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 Maidenhead Torquay ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 0-4 ✖ Incorrect

Model vs Closing Market

Broadly Aligned

The model and closing market are broadly aligned.

Largest probability gap: Torquay -4.1 pp

Outcome Model Closing Market Difference Signal
Maidenhead 36.1% 33.0% +3.1 pp Aligned
Draw 29.6% 28.6% +1.1 pp Aligned
Torquay 34.2% 38.4% -4.1 pp Aligned

The model and closing market are broadly aligned, with probability differences below 5 percentage points.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.

After full time, the result was Torquay win 0–4.

Market Assessment

The market and model are broadly aligned. Any small pricing gap likely reflects rounding or bookmaker margin, not a structural disagreement.

  • Current pricing remains close to the model baseline.

Post Match Insights

What worked

  • Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.60) — 4 goals materialised
  • Both Teams To Score (No) matched the full-time result

What failed

  • Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (4 goals)
  • 1X2: model leaned Maidenhead; match finished Torquay

Market lesson

The full-time result was Torquay win 0–4, which did not match the model's pre-match lean on 1X2.

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Prediction Timeline

How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.

  1. Sep 08, 2026 · 18:46 UTC Forecast generated
    • Model 1X2 · Maidenhead 36.1% · Draw 29.7% · Torquay 34.2%
    • xG · Maidenhead 1.32 — Torquay 1.28
  2. Sep 08, 2026 · 18:16 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
    • 1X2 odds · Maidenhead 2.81 · Draw 3.25 · Torquay 2.42
    • Implied 1X2 · Maidenhead 33.0% · Draw 28.6% · Torquay 38.4%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  3. Sep 08, 2026 · 18:46 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
    • 1X2 odds · Maidenhead 2.81 · Draw 3.25 · Torquay 2.42
    • Implied 1X2 · Maidenhead 33.0% · Draw 28.6% · Torquay 38.4%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  4. Sep 08, 2026 · 18:45 UTC Kickoff
  5. FT Full-time result Torquay win · 0–4
  6. FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
  7. Archived Prediction review

Historical Snapshot

Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.

Historical verdict: Monitor
Historical Decision Monitor
Outcome Missed
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
Prediction Reliability 77/100 · High
  • Validation: Pass
Evidence ★★★★★
  • No strong statistical edge
  • Direction agrees with model lean
  • Validation passed
Market Compatibility 27/100
Monitoring Confidence 34/100

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Sep 02, 2026 · 02:31 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-6581514

Closing Odds 2.42
AI Fair Odds —
CLV Pending
Final Result Torquay win · Maidenhead 0–4 Torquay
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Review FAQ

How accurate was the prediction?
This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
What does xG Accuracy measure?
xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
Does this improve the AI record?
Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

  • League: National League - South
  • Fixture: Maidenhead vs Torquay
  • Kickoff: 2026-09-08 18:45:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 36.1% · Draw 29.7% · Away 34.2%
  • xG (showing): Maidenhead 1.32 — Torquay 1.28 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Best +EV line (same label as hero card when Primary thresholds are not met): Under 2.5 goals
  • Model: 51.8% · Implied: 46.3% · Probability edge: +5.5 pts · Est. EV: +11.4%
  • BTTS (model): Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.5%)

Totals and BTTS are evaluated against current market prices where available.

Early match state can move realised goals away from pre-kick projections.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Monitor

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 29, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Maidenhead & Torquay!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Predictions
National League - South National League - South — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Maidstone Utd 9 6 1 2 19
2 Weston-super-Mare 9 5 2 2 17
3 Dagenham & Redbridge 9 5 1 3 16
4 Salisbury 9 4 3 2 15
5 Billericay Town 9 4 3 2 15
6 Tonbridge Angels 9 4 2 3 14
7 Truro City 8 4 2 2 14
8 Dover 9 4 2 3 14
9 Dorking Wanderers 9 3 4 2 13
10 Torquay 9 3 4 2 13
11 Farnham Town 8 4 1 3 13
12 Folkestone Invicta 8 3 3 2 12
13 Chesham United 9 3 1 5 10
14 Chelmsford City 8 1 7 0 10
15 Horsham 8 2 4 2 10
16 Hemel Hempstead Town 9 2 4 3 10
17 Maidenhead 9 2 4 3 10
18 Braintree 8 3 1 4 10
19 AFC Totton 8 3 1 4 10
20 Farnborough 8 3 1 4 10
21 Hampton & Richmond 9 2 2 5 8
22 Ebbsfleet United 3 1 2 0 5
23 Slough Town 8 1 0 7 3
24 Walton & Hersham 8 0 1 7 1
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Tonbridge Angels 9 18 9 +9 14
2 Dorking Wanderers 9 18 13 +5 13
3 Billericay Town 9 18 14 +4 15
4 Maidstone Utd 9 17 9 +8 19
5 Weston-super-Mare 9 16 7 +9 17
6 Salisbury 9 16 7 +9 15
7 Chesham United 9 16 15 +1 10
8 Folkestone Invicta 8 15 9 +6 12
9 Dover 9 15 16 -1 14
10 Torquay 9 13 11 +2 13
11 Braintree 8 13 18 -5 10
12 Truro City 8 11 4 +7 14
13 Farnham Town 8 11 10 +1 13
14 Hampton & Richmond 9 11 23 -12 8
15 Dagenham & Redbridge 9 9 7 +2 16
16 Chelmsford City 8 9 8 +1 10
17 Horsham 8 9 10 -1 10
18 Slough Town 8 9 21 -12 3
19 Hemel Hempstead Town 9 8 10 -2 10
20 Maidenhead 9 8 11 -3 10
21 AFC Totton 8 8 13 -5 10
22 Farnborough 8 6 11 -5 10
23 Walton & Hersham 8 4 24 -20 1
24 Ebbsfleet United 3 3 1 +2 5
National League - South England. National League - South Predictions