AI correctly predicted the 2 de Mayo win.
The match finished 2–1, validating the model's directional assessment.
Tracked markets vs full-time result
Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.
- Market Prediction Result Outcome
- Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Over 2.5 (3 goals) ✔ Correct
- Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
- 1X2 2 de Mayo 2 de Mayo ✔ Correct
- Correct Score Insights 1-1, 2-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-0 2-1 ✔ Correct
Model vs Closing Market
| Outcome | Model | Closing Market | Difference | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 de Mayo | 45.1% | 21.2% | +23.9 pp | Model Edge |
| Draw | 26.2% | 31.4% | -5.2 pp | Market Higher |
| Cerro Porteno | 28.7% | 47.4% | -18.6 pp | Market Higher |
The statistical model estimates 2 de Mayo's win probability at 45.1%, compared with the closing market's implied probability of 21.2%, a difference of 23.9 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model's assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
After full time, the model's directional lean matched the result (2 de Mayo win 2–1).
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 3.10) — 3 goals materialised
- 2 de Mayo attacking xG significantly stronger (1.74 vs 1.36)
- Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
Market lesson
Large model–market gaps do not automatically mean the market is right. Here the closing market priced 2 de Mayo more conservatively (21.2% vs model 45.1%, 23.9 pp), but the model's lean was validated (2 de Mayo win 2–1).
Prediction Timeline
How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.
-
Jul 28, 2026 · 21:29 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · 2 de Mayo 45.1% · Draw 26.2% · Cerro Porteno 28.8%
- xG · 2 de Mayo 1.74 — Cerro Porteno 1.36
-
Jul 28, 2026 · 20:59 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · 2 de Mayo 4.49 · Draw 3.03 · Cerro Porteno 2.01
- Implied 1X2 · 2 de Mayo 21.2% · Draw 31.4% · Cerro Porteno 47.4%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Jul 28, 2026 · 21:29 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · 2 de Mayo 4.49 · Draw 3.03 · Cerro Porteno 2.01
- Implied 1X2 · 2 de Mayo 21.2% · Draw 31.4% · Cerro Porteno 47.4%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Jul 28, 2026 · 21:30 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result 2 de Mayo win · 2–1
-
FT Prediction validated Directional lean matched full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Historical Snapshot
Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.
Historical label: Originally displayed as "Wait for validation".
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
- Validation: Warning
- Large market gap (24 pp)
- Statistical edge detected
- Pricing remains divergent
- Validation warning
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Review FAQ
- How accurate was the prediction?
- This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
- What does xG Accuracy measure?
- xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
- Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
- Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
- Does this improve the AI record?
- Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore More Predictions Content
Get Premium Predictions for 2 de Mayo & Cerro Porteno!
Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.
Subscribe Now
Division Profesional - Clausura — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Libertad Asuncion | 11 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 23 |
| 2 | Nacional Asuncion | 12 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 22 |
| 3 | 2 de Mayo | 12 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 22 |
| 4 | Olimpia | 11 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 22 |
| 5 | Club Guarani | 12 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 20 |
| 6 | Sportivo Ameliano | 12 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 18 |
| 7 | Sportivo Trinidense | 11 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 17 |
| 8 | Cerro Porteno | 11 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 17 |
| 9 | Sportivo Luqueno | 12 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 13 |
| 10 | Rubio NU | 12 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 9 |
| 11 | Deportivo Recoleta | 11 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 7 |
| 12 | Club Sp. San Lorenzo | 11 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 1 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Olimpia | 11 | 20 | 9 | +11 | 22 |
| 2 | Nacional Asuncion | 12 | 19 | 7 | +12 | 22 |
| 3 | Libertad Asuncion | 11 | 19 | 12 | +7 | 23 |
| 4 | Sportivo Trinidense | 11 | 18 | 10 | +8 | 17 |
| 5 | Cerro Porteno | 11 | 14 | 10 | +4 | 17 |
| 6 | 2 de Mayo | 12 | 14 | 13 | +1 | 22 |
| 7 | Sportivo Ameliano | 12 | 14 | 13 | +1 | 18 |
| 8 | Club Guarani | 12 | 13 | 9 | +4 | 20 |
| 9 | Rubio NU | 12 | 13 | 23 | -10 | 9 |
| 10 | Deportivo Recoleta | 11 | 13 | 24 | -11 | 7 |
| 11 | Sportivo Luqueno | 12 | 12 | 21 | -9 | 13 |
| 12 | Club Sp. San Lorenzo | 11 | 3 | 21 | -18 | 1 |
