Prediction Audit: Gandzasar vs Shirak Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Aug 14, 2026 - 16:00
0 1.28
1 1.32
xG Accuracy: 64%

AI correctly predicted the Shirak win.

The match finished 0–1, validating the model's directional assessment.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Prediction grade B-

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (1 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 Shirak Shirak ✔ Correct
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 0-1 ✔ Correct

Model vs Closing Market

Moderate Disagreement

The closing market prices Gandzasar higher than the statistical model.

Largest probability gap: Gandzasar -9.3 pp

Outcome Model Closing Market Difference Signal
Gandzasar 34.2% 43.6% -9.3 pp Market Higher
Draw 29.6% 29.6% +0.1 pp Aligned
Shirak 36.1% 26.9% +9.2 pp Model Higher

The closing market estimates Gandzasar's win probability at 43.6%, compared with the model's estimate of 34.2%, a difference of 9.3 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.

After full time, the model's directional lean matched the result (Shirak win 0–1).

Market Assessment

The market and model broadly agree on Gandzasar. The remaining divergence may reflect differences in team-strength assumptions rather than a directional disagreement.

  • Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.

Post Match Insights

What worked

  • Under 2.5 goals aligned with the xG profile
  • Exact score 0–1 fell within the model's highlighted bins

What failed

  • Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS Yes; match finished BTTS No

Market lesson

Large model–market gaps do not automatically mean the market is right. Here the closing market priced Shirak higher (45.4% vs model 36.1%, 9.3 pp), but the model's lean was validated (Shirak win 0–1).

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Prediction Timeline

How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.

  1. Aug 14, 2026 · 16:01 UTC Forecast generated
    • Model 1X2 · Gandzasar 34.2% · Draw 29.7% · Shirak 36.1%
    • xG · Gandzasar 1.28 — Shirak 1.32
  2. Aug 14, 2026 · 15:32 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
    • 1X2 odds · Gandzasar 2.09 · Draw 3.08 · Shirak 3.39
    • Implied 1X2 · Gandzasar 43.6% · Draw 29.6% · Shirak 26.9%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  3. Aug 14, 2026 · 16:01 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
    • 1X2 odds · Gandzasar 2.09 · Draw 3.08 · Shirak 3.39
    • Implied 1X2 · Gandzasar 43.6% · Draw 29.6% · Shirak 26.9%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  4. Aug 14, 2026 · 16:00 UTC Kickoff
  5. FT Full-time result Shirak win · 0–1
  6. FT Prediction validated Directional lean matched full-time result
  7. Archived Prediction review

Historical Snapshot

Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.

Historical verdict: Monitor
Historical Decision Monitor
Outcome Validated
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
Prediction Reliability 74/100 · High
  • Validation: Pass
Evidence ★★★★★
  • No strong statistical edge
  • Direction agrees with model lean
  • Validation passed
Pricing proximity (inverse gap) 18/100
Monitoring Confidence 33/100

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Aug 08, 2026 · 01:26 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-3228502

Closing Odds 2.09
AI Fair Odds —
CLV Pending
Final Result Shirak win · Gandzasar 0–1 Shirak
Prediction ✔ Correct
Decision Grade B-

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Review FAQ

How accurate was the prediction?
This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
What does xG Accuracy measure?
xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
Does this improve the AI record?
Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Pre-match snapshot for this fixture.

  • League: Premier League
  • Fixture: Gandzasar vs Shirak
  • Kickoff: 2026-08-14 16:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 34.2% · Draw 29.7% · Away 36.1%
  • xG (showing): Gandzasar 1.28 — Shirak 1.32 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Value headline: None — no positive EV on tracked lines at current best prices (same as the decision block: no default bet).
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 51.8% · Over 2.5 48.2%); BTTS Yes (Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS Yes
  • BTTS (model): Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.5%)

Saying “no value” on a snapshot is a feature, not a bug: it protects readers from forcing a play when the edge is not there.

If lines move materially, re-run generation or refresh — implied probabilities and any future EV readouts will change first.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Monitor

Outcome: Validated — Pre-match lean validated against the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 29, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Gandzasar & Shirak!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Predictions
Premier League Premier League — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 FC Noah 8 8 0 0 24
2 Ararat-Armenia 8 6 1 1 19
3 Pyunik Yerevan 8 5 3 0 18
4 Alashkert 8 4 3 1 15
5 Sardarapat 8 3 3 2 12
6 FC Urartu 8 3 2 3 11
7 Shirak 8 3 1 4 10
8 Ararat 8 3 0 5 9
9 BKMA 8 2 2 4 8
10 Van 8 1 1 6 4
11 Gandzasar 8 1 0 7 3
12 Syunik 8 0 2 6 2
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 FC Noah 8 21 5 +16 24
2 Alashkert 8 18 6 +12 15
3 Pyunik Yerevan 8 18 8 +10 18
4 Ararat-Armenia 8 17 8 +9 19
5 Sardarapat 8 14 12 +2 12
6 FC Urartu 8 12 10 +2 11
7 Shirak 8 11 10 +1 10
8 BKMA 8 8 10 -2 8
9 Gandzasar 8 8 20 -12 3
10 Ararat 8 6 13 -7 9
11 Van 8 4 21 -17 4
12 Syunik 8 3 17 -14 2