Prediction Audit: HIK vs Roskilde Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Sep 25, 2026 - 17:00
1 1.22
1 1.38
xG Accuracy: 85%

The model missed the final outcome (Draw 1–1).

The model had projected Roskilde at 39.0%, but the full-time result went the other way.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Prediction grade F

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (2 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS No Yes ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 Roskilde Draw ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 1-1 ✔ Correct

Model vs Closing Market

Strong Disagreement

The closing market prices Roskilde higher than the statistical model.

Largest probability gap: Roskilde -24.3 pp

Outcome Model Closing Market Difference Signal
HIK 31.5% 15.8% +15.6 pp Model Edge
Draw 29.5% 20.9% +8.6 pp Model Higher
Roskilde 39.0% 63.3% -24.3 pp Market Higher

The closing market estimates Roskilde's win probability at 63.3%, compared with the model's estimate of 39.0%, a difference of 24.3 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.

After full time, the result was Draw 1–1.

Post Match Insights

What worked

  • Under 2.5 goals aligned with the xG profile
  • Exact score 1–1 fell within the model's highlighted bins

What failed

  • Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS No; match finished BTTS Yes
  • 1X2: model leaned Roskilde; match finished Draw

Market lesson

The closing market differed from the model on Roskilde by 24.3 percentage points (63.3% vs model 39.0%) — in this case the market view proved closer.

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Prediction Timeline

How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.

  1. Sep 25, 2026 · 17:00 UTC Forecast generated
    • Model 1X2 · HIK 31.5% · Draw 29.5% · Roskilde 39.0%
    • xG · HIK 1.22 — Roskilde 1.38
  2. Sep 25, 2026 · 16:30 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
    • 1X2 odds · HIK 5.79 · Draw 4.39 · Roskilde 1.45
    • Implied 1X2 · HIK 15.8% · Draw 20.9% · Roskilde 63.3%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  3. Sep 25, 2026 · 17:00 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
    • 1X2 odds · HIK 5.79 · Draw 4.39 · Roskilde 1.45
    • Implied 1X2 · HIK 15.8% · Draw 20.9% · Roskilde 63.3%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  4. Sep 25, 2026 · 17:00 UTC Kickoff
  5. FT Full-time result Draw · 1–1
  6. FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
  7. Archived Prediction review

Historical Snapshot

Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.

Historical verdict: Cautious / Wait

Historical label: Originally displayed as "Wait for validation".

Historical Decision Wait
Outcome Missed
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
Prediction Reliability 51/100 · Moderate
  • Validation: Warning
  • Large market gap (24 pp)
Evidence ★★★★★
  • No strong statistical edge
  • Pricing remains divergent
  • Validation warning
Pricing proximity (inverse gap) 0/100
Betting Confidence 33/100

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Sep 19, 2026 · 01:16 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-9569274

Closing Odds 1.45
AI Fair Odds —
CLV Pending
Final Result Draw · HIK 1–1 Roskilde
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Review FAQ

How accurate was the prediction?
This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
What does xG Accuracy measure?
xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
Does this improve the AI record?
Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Pre-match snapshot for this fixture.

  • League: 2. Division
  • Fixture: HIK vs Roskilde
  • Kickoff: 2026-09-25 17:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 31.5% · Draw 29.5% · Away 39.0%
  • xG (showing): HIK 1.22 — Roskilde 1.38 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Value headline: At least one tracked line reaches the headline EV threshold — align with the hero / Primary card if shown.
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 51.8% · Over 2.5 48.2%); BTTS No (Yes 54.4% · No 45.6%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS No
  • BTTS (model): Yes 54.4% · No 45.6%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.5%)

Saying “no value” on a snapshot is a feature, not a bug: it protects readers from forcing a play when the edge is not there.

Most likely correct score stays a low-probability tail: use it for context, not as a must-bet story.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Wait

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 28, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for HIK & Roskilde!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Predictions
2. Division 2. Division — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Nykobing FC 9 6 3 0 21
2 VSK Århus 9 5 3 1 18
3 Roskilde 9 3 6 0 15
4 Fremad Amager 9 3 5 1 14
5 Middelfart 8 3 4 1 13
6 Naestved 8 3 4 1 13
7 B 93 9 3 3 3 12
8 Skive 9 3 2 4 11
9 HIK 9 2 2 5 8
10 Brabrand 9 1 3 5 6
11 FA 2000 9 1 2 6 5
12 Thisted FC 9 1 1 7 4
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Nykobing FC 9 24 10 +14 21
2 Roskilde 9 16 10 +6 15
3 Middelfart 8 15 8 +7 13
4 VSK Århus 9 14 5 +9 18
5 Fremad Amager 9 13 12 +1 14
6 B 93 9 13 13 0 12
7 Naestved 8 11 9 +2 13
8 Skive 9 11 12 -1 11
9 Brabrand 9 10 18 -8 6
10 FA 2000 9 10 21 -11 5
11 HIK 9 8 16 -8 8
12 Thisted FC 9 8 19 -11 4