The model missed the final outcome (SC Paderborn 07 win 3–1).
The model had projected 1899 Hoffenheim at 45.6%, but the full-time result went the other way.
Tracked markets vs full-time result
Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.
- Market Prediction Result Outcome
- Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Over 2.5 (4 goals) ✔ Correct
- Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
- 1X2 1899 Hoffenheim SC Paderborn 07 ✖ Incorrect
- Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-2, 2-1, 2-2, 0-1 3-1 ✖ Incorrect
Model vs Closing Market
| Outcome | Model | Closing Market | Difference | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SC Paderborn 07 | 30.6% | 22.7% | +7.9 pp | Model Higher |
| Draw | 23.8% | 21.2% | +2.6 pp | Aligned |
| 1899 Hoffenheim | 45.6% | 56.1% | -10.5 pp | Market Higher |
The closing market estimates 1899 Hoffenheim's win probability at 56.1%, compared with the model's estimate of 45.6%, a difference of 10.5 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
After full time, the result was SC Paderborn 07 win 3–1.
Market Assessment
The market is materially more optimistic about 1899 Hoffenheim than the current fair estimate.
- Investors may be incorporating information not fully reflected in the baseline model.
- Tournament-specific context can shift market pricing.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 3.44) — 4 goals materialised
- Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
- Over 2.5 goals aligned with the xG profile
What failed
- 1X2: model leaned 1899 Hoffenheim; match finished SC Paderborn 07
- Exact score: outside the model's top score bins
Market lesson
The closing market differed from the model on 1899 Hoffenheim by 10.5 percentage points (56.1% vs model 45.6%) — in this case the market view proved closer.
Prediction Timeline
How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.
-
Sep 20, 2026 · 19:40 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · SC Paderborn 07 30.6% · Draw 23.8% · 1899 Hoffenheim 45.6%
- xG · SC Paderborn 07 1.72 — 1899 Hoffenheim 1.72
-
Sep 20, 2026 · 17:02 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · SC Paderborn 07 4.26 · Draw 4.55 · 1899 Hoffenheim 1.72
- Implied 1X2 · SC Paderborn 07 22.7% · Draw 21.2% · 1899 Hoffenheim 56.1%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Sep 20, 2026 · 17:29 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · SC Paderborn 07 4.26 · Draw 4.55 · 1899 Hoffenheim 1.72
- Implied 1X2 · SC Paderborn 07 22.7% · Draw 21.2% · 1899 Hoffenheim 56.1%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Sep 20, 2026 · 17:30 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result SC Paderborn 07 win · 3–1
-
FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Historical Snapshot
Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
- Validation: Warning
- Large market gap (11 pp)
- No strong statistical edge
- Market has already priced much of the edge
- Validation warning
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Review FAQ
- How accurate was the prediction?
- This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
- What does xG Accuracy measure?
- xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
- Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
- Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
- Does this improve the AI record?
- Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore More Predictions Content
Get Premium Predictions for SC Paderborn 07 & 1899 Hoffenheim!
Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.
Subscribe Now
Bundesliga — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Borussia Dortmund | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
| 2 | Bayern München | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 10 |
| 3 | SC Freiburg | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 10 |
| 4 | FC Augsburg | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| 5 | Bayer Leverkusen | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| 6 | FSV Mainz 05 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| 7 | SV Elversberg | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| 8 | Werder Bremen | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| 9 | RB Leipzig | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
| 10 | Eintracht Frankfurt | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| 11 | FC Schalke 04 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| 12 | SC Paderborn 07 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| 13 | 1.FC Köln | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| 14 | 1899 Hoffenheim | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| 15 | VfB Stuttgart | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| 16 | Hamburger SV | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| 17 | Union Berlin | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
| 18 | Borussia Mönchengladbach | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bayern München | 4 | 14 | 2 | +12 | 10 |
| 2 | SC Freiburg | 4 | 12 | 3 | +9 | 10 |
| 3 | FC Augsburg | 4 | 11 | 6 | +5 | 7 |
| 4 | Bayer Leverkusen | 4 | 10 | 5 | +5 | 7 |
| 5 | FSV Mainz 05 | 4 | 10 | 6 | +4 | 7 |
| 6 | Borussia Dortmund | 4 | 9 | 2 | +7 | 12 |
| 7 | RB Leipzig | 4 | 9 | 5 | +4 | 6 |
| 8 | Eintracht Frankfurt | 4 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 5 |
| 9 | SV Elversberg | 4 | 8 | 7 | +1 | 7 |
| 10 | Werder Bremen | 4 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 7 |
| 11 | 1899 Hoffenheim | 4 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 3 |
| 12 | 1.FC Köln | 4 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 4 |
| 13 | VfB Stuttgart | 4 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 3 |
| 14 | Borussia Mönchengladbach | 4 | 6 | 16 | -10 | 0 |
| 15 | Union Berlin | 4 | 4 | 17 | -13 | 1 |
| 16 | FC Schalke 04 | 4 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 5 |
| 17 | SC Paderborn 07 | 4 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 4 |
| 18 | Hamburger SV | 4 | 2 | 13 | -11 | 3 |
| # | TEAM | MP | xG | xGC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RB Leipzig | 4 | 4.0 | 0.9 | +3.1 | 6 |
| 2 | Bayern München | 4 | 3.9 | 0.9 | +3.0 | 10 |
| 3 | SC Freiburg | 4 | 1.9 | 0.5 | +1.4 | 10 |
| 4 | FC Augsburg | 4 | 4.7 | 3.8 | +0.9 | 7 |
| 5 | Bayer Leverkusen | 4 | 1.9 | 1.1 | +0.8 | 7 |
| 6 | Borussia Dortmund | 4 | 1.4 | 0.7 | +0.7 | 12 |
| 7 | Eintracht Frankfurt | 4 | 3.6 | 3.0 | +0.6 | 5 |
| 8 | Union Berlin | 4 | 1.9 | 1.4 | +0.5 | 1 |
| 9 | FSV Mainz 05 | 4 | 1.2 | 0.8 | +0.4 | 7 |
| 10 | 1899 Hoffenheim | 4 | 1.8 | 1.7 | +0.1 | 3 |
| 11 | 1.FC Köln | 4 | 1.7 | 1.8 | -0.1 | 4 |
| 12 | SC Paderborn 07 | 4 | 0.8 | 1.2 | -0.4 | 4 |
| 13 | Hamburger SV | 4 | 0.7 | 1.4 | -0.7 | 3 |
| 14 | SV Elversberg | 4 | 1.1 | 1.9 | -0.8 | 7 |
| 15 | Werder Bremen | 4 | 0.5 | 1.9 | -1.4 | 7 |
| 16 | FC Schalke 04 | 4 | 1.5 | 3.5 | -2.0 | 5 |
| 17 | VfB Stuttgart | 4 | 0.9 | 3.9 | -3.0 | 3 |
| 18 | Borussia Mönchengladbach | 4 | 0.9 | 4.0 | -3.1 | 0 |