The model missed the final outcome (Werder Bremen win 3–1).
The model had projected RB Leipzig at 62.7%, but the full-time result went the other way.
Tracked markets vs full-time result
Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.
- Market Prediction Result Outcome
- Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Over 2.5 (4 goals) ✔ Correct
- Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
- 1X2 RB Leipzig Werder Bremen ✖ Incorrect
- Correct Score Insights 1-2, 0-2, 1-1, 0-1, 1-3 3-1 ✖ Incorrect
Model vs Closing Market
| Outcome | Model | Closing Market | Difference | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Werder Bremen | 15.5% | 23.0% | -7.5 pp | Market Higher |
| Draw | 21.7% | 22.2% | -0.5 pp | Aligned |
| RB Leipzig | 62.7% | 54.8% | +7.9 pp | Model Higher |
The statistical model estimates RB Leipzig's win probability at 62.7%, compared with the closing market's implied probability of 54.8%, a difference of 7.9 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model's assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
After full time, the result was Werder Bremen win 3–1.
Market Assessment
The fair estimate shows a modest edge over current market pricing on RB Leipzig.
- Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 3.25) — 4 goals materialised
- Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
- Over 2.5 goals aligned with the xG profile
What failed
- 1X2: model leaned RB Leipzig; match finished Werder Bremen
- Exact score: outside the model's top score bins
Market lesson
The closing market differed from the model on RB Leipzig by 7.9 percentage points (54.8% vs model 62.7%) — in this case the market view proved closer.
Prediction Timeline
How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.
-
Sep 05, 2026 · 19:26 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Werder Bremen 15.5% · Draw 21.7% · RB Leipzig 62.8%
- xG · Werder Bremen 1.04 — RB Leipzig 2.21
-
Sep 05, 2026 · 13:06 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Werder Bremen 4.20 · Draw 4.35 · RB Leipzig 1.76
- Implied 1X2 · Werder Bremen 23.0% · Draw 22.2% · RB Leipzig 54.8%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Sep 05, 2026 · 13:30 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Werder Bremen 4.20 · Draw 4.35 · RB Leipzig 1.76
- Implied 1X2 · Werder Bremen 23.0% · Draw 22.2% · RB Leipzig 54.8%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Sep 05, 2026 · 13:30 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Werder Bremen win · 3–1
-
FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Historical Snapshot
Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
- Validation: Pass
- High xG deviation from league baseline (64%+)
- Strong model lean
- Direction agrees with model lean
- Validation passed
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Review FAQ
- How accurate was the prediction?
- This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
- What does xG Accuracy measure?
- xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
- Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
- Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
- Does this improve the AI record?
- Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore More Predictions Content
Get Premium Predictions for Werder Bremen & RB Leipzig!
Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.
Subscribe Now
Bundesliga — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Borussia Dortmund | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
| 2 | Bayern München | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 10 |
| 3 | SC Freiburg | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 10 |
| 4 | FC Augsburg | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| 5 | Bayer Leverkusen | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| 6 | FSV Mainz 05 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| 7 | SV Elversberg | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| 8 | Werder Bremen | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| 9 | RB Leipzig | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
| 10 | Eintracht Frankfurt | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| 11 | FC Schalke 04 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| 12 | SC Paderborn 07 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| 13 | 1.FC Köln | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| 14 | 1899 Hoffenheim | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| 15 | VfB Stuttgart | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| 16 | Hamburger SV | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| 17 | Union Berlin | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
| 18 | Borussia Mönchengladbach | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bayern München | 4 | 14 | 2 | +12 | 10 |
| 2 | SC Freiburg | 4 | 12 | 3 | +9 | 10 |
| 3 | FC Augsburg | 4 | 11 | 6 | +5 | 7 |
| 4 | Bayer Leverkusen | 4 | 10 | 5 | +5 | 7 |
| 5 | FSV Mainz 05 | 4 | 10 | 6 | +4 | 7 |
| 6 | Borussia Dortmund | 4 | 9 | 2 | +7 | 12 |
| 7 | RB Leipzig | 4 | 9 | 5 | +4 | 6 |
| 8 | Eintracht Frankfurt | 4 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 5 |
| 9 | SV Elversberg | 4 | 8 | 7 | +1 | 7 |
| 10 | Werder Bremen | 4 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 7 |
| 11 | 1899 Hoffenheim | 4 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 3 |
| 12 | 1.FC Köln | 4 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 4 |
| 13 | VfB Stuttgart | 4 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 3 |
| 14 | Borussia Mönchengladbach | 4 | 6 | 16 | -10 | 0 |
| 15 | Union Berlin | 4 | 4 | 17 | -13 | 1 |
| 16 | FC Schalke 04 | 4 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 5 |
| 17 | SC Paderborn 07 | 4 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 4 |
| 18 | Hamburger SV | 4 | 2 | 13 | -11 | 3 |
| # | TEAM | MP | xG | xGC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RB Leipzig | 4 | 4.0 | 0.9 | +3.1 | 6 |
| 2 | Bayern München | 4 | 3.9 | 0.9 | +3.0 | 10 |
| 3 | SC Freiburg | 4 | 1.9 | 0.5 | +1.4 | 10 |
| 4 | FC Augsburg | 4 | 4.7 | 3.8 | +0.9 | 7 |
| 5 | Bayer Leverkusen | 4 | 1.9 | 1.1 | +0.8 | 7 |
| 6 | Borussia Dortmund | 4 | 1.4 | 0.7 | +0.7 | 12 |
| 7 | Eintracht Frankfurt | 4 | 3.6 | 3.0 | +0.6 | 5 |
| 8 | Union Berlin | 4 | 1.9 | 1.4 | +0.5 | 1 |
| 9 | FSV Mainz 05 | 4 | 1.2 | 0.8 | +0.4 | 7 |
| 10 | 1899 Hoffenheim | 4 | 1.8 | 1.7 | +0.1 | 3 |
| 11 | 1.FC Köln | 4 | 1.7 | 1.8 | -0.1 | 4 |
| 12 | SC Paderborn 07 | 4 | 0.8 | 1.2 | -0.4 | 4 |
| 13 | Hamburger SV | 4 | 0.7 | 1.4 | -0.7 | 3 |
| 14 | SV Elversberg | 4 | 1.1 | 1.9 | -0.8 | 7 |
| 15 | Werder Bremen | 4 | 0.5 | 1.9 | -1.4 | 7 |
| 16 | FC Schalke 04 | 4 | 1.5 | 3.5 | -2.0 | 5 |
| 17 | VfB Stuttgart | 4 | 0.9 | 3.9 | -3.0 | 3 |
| 18 | Borussia Mönchengladbach | 4 | 0.9 | 4.0 | -3.1 | 0 |