Predictions / Football / Switzerland. 1. Liga Promotion / Kreuzlingen vs Cham

Prediction Audit: Kreuzlingen vs Cham Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Kreuzlingen Kreuzlingen
Aug 19, 2026 - 17:30
1 1.25
2 1.35
xG Accuracy: 78%
Cham Cham

AI correctly predicted the Cham win.

The match finished 1–2, validating the model's directional assessment.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Prediction grade B-

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (3 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 Cham Cham ✔ Correct
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 1-2 ✔ Correct

Model vs Closing Market

Moderate Disagreement

The closing market prices Cham higher than the statistical model.

Largest probability gap: Cham -7.8 pp

Outcome Model Closing Market Difference Signal
Kreuzlingen 32.9% 29.6% +3.3 pp Aligned
Draw 29.6% 25.1% +4.6 pp Aligned
Cham 37.5% 45.4% -7.8 pp Market Higher

The closing market estimates Cham's win probability at 45.4%, compared with the model's estimate of 37.5%, a difference of 7.8 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.

After full time, the model's directional lean matched the result (Cham win 1–2).

Market Assessment

The market and model broadly agree on Cham. The remaining divergence may reflect differences in team-strength assumptions rather than a directional disagreement.

  • Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.

Post Match Insights

What worked

  • Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.60) — 3 goals materialised
  • Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
  • Exact score 1–2 fell within the model's highlighted bins

What failed

  • Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (3 goals)

Market lesson

Large model–market gaps do not automatically mean the market is right. Here the closing market priced Cham higher (45.3% vs model 37.5%, 7.8 pp), but the model's lean was validated (Cham win 1–2).

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Prediction Timeline

How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.

  1. Aug 19, 2026 · 17:29 UTC Forecast generated
    • Model 1X2 · Kreuzlingen 32.9% · Draw 29.6% · Cham 37.6%
    • xG · Kreuzlingen 1.25 — Cham 1.35
  2. Aug 19, 2026 · 17:00 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
    • 1X2 odds · Kreuzlingen 3.10 · Draw 3.66 · Cham 2.02
    • Implied 1X2 · Kreuzlingen 29.6% · Draw 25.1% · Cham 45.4%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  3. Aug 19, 2026 · 17:29 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
    • 1X2 odds · Kreuzlingen 3.10 · Draw 3.66 · Cham 2.02
    • Implied 1X2 · Kreuzlingen 29.6% · Draw 25.1% · Cham 45.4%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  4. Aug 19, 2026 · 17:30 UTC Kickoff
  5. FT Full-time result Cham win · 1–2
  6. FT Prediction validated Directional lean matched full-time result
  7. Archived Prediction review

Historical Snapshot

Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.

Historical verdict: Observe
Historical Decision No Primary Bet
Outcome Validated
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
Prediction Reliability 75/100 · High
  • Validation: Pass
Evidence ★★★★★
  • No strong statistical edge
  • Direction agrees with model lean
  • Validation passed
Pricing proximity (inverse gap) 60/100
Betting Confidence 78/100

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Aug 13, 2026 · 02:06 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-3820545

Closing Odds 2.02
AI Fair Odds —
CLV Pending
Final Result Cham win · Kreuzlingen 1–2 Cham
Prediction ✔ Correct
Decision Grade B-

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Review FAQ

How accurate was the prediction?
This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
What does xG Accuracy measure?
xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
Does this improve the AI record?
Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Quick read on how the model reads this matchup.

  • League: 1. Liga Promotion
  • Fixture: Kreuzlingen vs Cham
  • Kickoff: 2026-08-19 17:30:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 32.9% · Draw 29.6% · Away 37.6%
  • xG (showing): Kreuzlingen 1.25 — Cham 1.35 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Value headline: None — no positive EV on tracked lines at current best prices (same as the decision block: no default bet).
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 51.8% · Over 2.5 48.2%); BTTS Yes (Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS Yes
  • BTTS (model): Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.5%)

Saying “no value” on a snapshot is a feature, not a bug: it protects readers from forcing a play when the edge is not there.

Prefer skipping to over-staking when the engine is honest about missing edge.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: No Primary Bet

Outcome: Validated — Pre-match lean validated against the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 28, 2026 (UTC)

Related Predictions

See Upcoming 1. Liga Promotion Matches Track Kreuzlingen Next Match Prediction Track Cham Next Match Prediction View Today's Football Predictions

Get Premium Predictions for Kreuzlingen & Cham!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Predictions
1. Liga Promotion 1. Liga Promotion — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Biel-Bienne 9 7 1 1 22
2 FC Schaffhausen 9 6 1 2 19
3 Cham 9 6 1 2 19
4 Grand-Saconnex 9 6 0 3 18
5 Bulle 9 5 2 2 17
6 Paradiso 9 5 1 3 16
7 YF Juventus 9 4 1 4 13
8 Amical Saint-Prex 9 4 1 4 13
9 Basel II 9 4 0 5 12
10 Brühl 9 3 2 4 11
11 Young Boys II 9 3 2 4 11
12 Zürich II 9 3 2 4 11
13 Breitenrain 8 3 1 4 10
14 Kreuzlingen 9 2 3 4 9
15 Lugano II 9 3 0 6 9
16 Bavois 9 2 2 5 8
17 Luzern II 9 2 1 6 7
18 Bellinzona 8 1 1 6 4
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Biel-Bienne 9 21 9 +12 22
2 Paradiso 9 19 9 +10 16
3 Grand-Saconnex 9 19 13 +6 18
4 Bulle 9 18 12 +6 17
5 Young Boys II 9 17 21 -4 11
6 Basel II 9 16 17 -1 12
7 FC Schaffhausen 9 15 10 +5 19
8 Lugano II 9 15 21 -6 9
9 Cham 9 14 9 +5 19
10 Zürich II 9 14 18 -4 11
11 YF Juventus 9 13 14 -1 13
12 Luzern II 9 13 16 -3 7
13 Amical Saint-Prex 9 13 20 -7 13
14 Brühl 9 12 12 0 11
15 Bavois 9 10 11 -1 8
16 Breitenrain 8 10 13 -3 10
17 Kreuzlingen 9 10 13 -3 9
18 Bellinzona 8 5 16 -11 4
1. Liga Promotion Switzerland. 1. Liga Promotion Predictions