The model missed the final outcome (Traiskirchen win 2–0).
The model had projected Krems / Rehberg at 38.5%, but the full-time result went the other way.
Tracked markets vs full-time result
Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.
- Market Prediction Result Outcome
- Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (2 goals) ✔ Correct
- Both Teams To Score BTTS No No ✔ Correct
- 1X2 Krems / Rehberg Traiskirchen ✖ Incorrect
- Correct Score Insights 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 2-0 ✖ Incorrect
Model vs Closing Market
| Outcome | Model | Closing Market | Difference | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Traiskirchen | 31.9% | 57.0% | -25.1 pp | Market Higher |
| Draw | 29.6% | 21.3% | +8.3 pp | Model Higher |
| Krems / Rehberg | 38.5% | 21.7% | +16.8 pp | Model Edge |
The closing market estimates Traiskirchen's win probability at 57.0%, compared with the model's estimate of 31.9%, a difference of 25.1 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
After full time, the result was Traiskirchen win 2–0.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Both Teams To Score (No) matched the full-time result
- Under 2.5 goals aligned with the xG profile
What failed
- 1X2: model leaned Krems / Rehberg; match finished Traiskirchen
- Exact score: outside the model's top score bins
Market lesson
The closing market differed from the model on Krems / Rehberg by 25.1 percentage points (63.5% vs model 38.5%) — in this case the market view proved closer.
Prediction Timeline
How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.
-
Sep 22, 2026 · 17:29 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Traiskirchen 31.9% · Draw 29.6% · Krems / Rehberg 38.5%
- xG · Traiskirchen 1.23 — Krems / Rehberg 1.37
-
Sep 22, 2026 · 16:59 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Traiskirchen 1.56 · Draw 4.18 · Krems / Rehberg 4.09
- Implied 1X2 · Traiskirchen 57.0% · Draw 21.3% · Krems / Rehberg 21.7%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Sep 22, 2026 · 17:29 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Traiskirchen 1.56 · Draw 4.18 · Krems / Rehberg 4.09
- Implied 1X2 · Traiskirchen 57.0% · Draw 21.3% · Krems / Rehberg 21.7%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Sep 22, 2026 · 17:30 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Traiskirchen win · 2–0
-
FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Historical Snapshot
Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.
Historical label: Originally displayed as "Wait for validation".
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
- Validation: Warning
- Large market gap (25 pp)
- No strong statistical edge
- Market strongly disagrees on price
- Validation warning
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Review FAQ
- How accurate was the prediction?
- This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
- What does xG Accuracy measure?
- xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
- Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
- Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
- Does this improve the AI record?
- Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore More Predictions Content
Get Premium Predictions for Traiskirchen & Krems / Rehberg!
Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.
Subscribe Now
Regionalliga - Ost — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mannsdorf-Großenzersdorf | 9 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 21 |
| 2 | Wiener SC | 9 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 19 |
| 3 | Oberwart | 9 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 18 |
| 4 | Traiskirchen | 9 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 17 |
| 5 | Wiener Viktoria | 9 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 16 |
| 6 | Scheiblingkirchen | 9 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 15 |
| 7 | Parndorf | 9 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 14 |
| 8 | Fach-Donaufeld | 9 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 14 |
| 9 | SV Horn | 9 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 11 |
| 10 | Krems / Rehberg | 9 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 11 |
| 11 | Leobendorf | 9 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 11 |
| 12 | Mattersburg SV 2020 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 10 |
| 13 | Donau | 9 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 10 |
| 14 | Favoritner AC | 9 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 9 |
| 15 | Gloggnitz | 9 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 8 |
| 16 | Wienerberg | 9 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mannsdorf-Großenzersdorf | 9 | 25 | 9 | +16 | 21 |
| 2 | Traiskirchen | 9 | 23 | 19 | +4 | 17 |
| 3 | Wiener SC | 9 | 21 | 7 | +14 | 19 |
| 4 | Oberwart | 9 | 18 | 12 | +6 | 18 |
| 5 | Wiener Viktoria | 9 | 15 | 9 | +6 | 16 |
| 6 | Parndorf | 9 | 15 | 13 | +2 | 14 |
| 7 | Scheiblingkirchen | 9 | 15 | 16 | -1 | 15 |
| 8 | Donau | 9 | 15 | 18 | -3 | 10 |
| 9 | SV Horn | 9 | 13 | 12 | +1 | 11 |
| 10 | Krems / Rehberg | 9 | 13 | 12 | +1 | 11 |
| 11 | Fach-Donaufeld | 9 | 11 | 10 | +1 | 14 |
| 12 | Mattersburg SV 2020 | 9 | 11 | 13 | -2 | 10 |
| 13 | Gloggnitz | 9 | 11 | 19 | -8 | 8 |
| 14 | Leobendorf | 9 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 11 |
| 15 | Favoritner AC | 9 | 6 | 12 | -6 | 9 |
| 16 | Wienerberg | 9 | 6 | 34 | -28 | 0 |
