AI correctly predicted the Estepona win.
The match finished 0–2, validating the model's directional assessment.
Tracked markets vs full-time result
Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.
- Market Prediction Result Outcome
- Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Under 2.5 (2 goals) ✖ Incorrect
- Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
- 1X2 Estepona Estepona ✔ Correct
- Correct Score Insights 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 0-2 ✖ Incorrect
Model vs Closing Market
| Outcome | Model | Closing Market | Difference | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Puente Genil | 31.9% | 37.2% | -5.3 pp | Market Higher |
| Draw | 29.6% | 30.8% | -1.3 pp | Aligned |
| Estepona | 38.5% | 31.9% | +6.6 pp | Model Higher |
The statistical model estimates Estepona's win probability at 38.5%, compared with the closing market's implied probability of 31.9%, a difference of 6.6 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model's assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
After full time, the model's directional lean matched the result (Estepona win 0–2).
Market Assessment
The fair estimate shows a modest edge over current market pricing on Estepona.
- Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.
Post Match Insights
What failed
- Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS Yes; match finished BTTS No
- Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Over 2.5; match finished Under 2.5 (2 goals)
Market lesson
Large model–market gaps do not automatically mean the market is right. Here the closing market priced Estepona more conservatively (31.9% vs model 38.5%, 6.6 pp), but the model's lean was validated (Estepona win 0–2).
Prediction Timeline
How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.
-
Sep 19, 2026 · 17:00 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Puente Genil 31.9% · Draw 29.6% · Estepona 38.5%
- xG · Puente Genil 1.23 — Estepona 1.37
-
Sep 19, 2026 · 16:32 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Puente Genil 2.40 · Draw 2.90 · Estepona 2.80
- Implied 1X2 · Puente Genil 37.2% · Draw 30.8% · Estepona 31.9%
- Bookmaker · Bet365
-
Sep 19, 2026 · 17:00 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Puente Genil 2.40 · Draw 2.90 · Estepona 2.80
- Implied 1X2 · Puente Genil 37.2% · Draw 30.8% · Estepona 31.9%
- Bookmaker · Bet365
-
Sep 19, 2026 · 17:00 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Estepona win · 0–2
-
FT Prediction validated Directional lean matched full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Historical Snapshot
Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
- Validation: Pass
- No strong statistical edge
- Direction agrees with model lean
- Validation passed
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Review FAQ
- How accurate was the prediction?
- This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
- What does xG Accuracy measure?
- xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
- Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
- Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
- Does this improve the AI record?
- Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore More Predictions Content
Get Premium Predictions for Puente Genil & Estepona!
Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.
Subscribe Now
Segunda División RFEF - Group 4 — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Real Betis II | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 10 |
| 2 | Don Benito | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 10 |
| 3 | Sevilla Atletico | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
| 4 | Tenerife II | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| 5 | Recreativo Huelva | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| 6 | Badajoz | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| 7 | Sanluqueño | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| 8 | Marbella | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 9 | Estepona | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 10 | Linares Deportivo | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| 11 | Puente Genil | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| 12 | Atlético Central | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| 13 | Las Palmas II | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| 14 | Ciudad de Lucena | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| 15 | Antoniano | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| 16 | Xerez | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| 17 | Mijas Las Lagunas | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| 18 | Tamaraceite | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Real Betis II | 4 | 6 | 0 | +6 | 10 |
| 2 | Don Benito | 4 | 6 | 1 | +5 | 10 |
| 3 | Sevilla Atletico | 3 | 6 | 2 | +4 | 7 |
| 4 | Tenerife II | 3 | 6 | 4 | +2 | 6 |
| 5 | Marbella | 3 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 4 |
| 6 | Recreativo Huelva | 3 | 5 | 4 | +1 | 6 |
| 7 | Puente Genil | 3 | 5 | 4 | +1 | 3 |
| 8 | Sanluqueño | 4 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| 9 | Linares Deportivo | 4 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 4 |
| 10 | Badajoz | 3 | 4 | 3 | +1 | 6 |
| 11 | Atlético Central | 3 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 3 |
| 12 | Estepona | 3 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 4 |
| 13 | Ciudad de Lucena | 3 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 2 |
| 14 | Antoniano | 3 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 2 |
| 15 | Mijas Las Lagunas | 3 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 2 |
| 16 | Xerez | 3 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 2 |
| 17 | Las Palmas II | 3 | 1 | 4 | -3 | 3 |
| 18 | Tamaraceite | 3 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 0 |
