Prediction Audit: Utebo vs Reddis Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Sep 27, 2026 - 16:00
0 1.35
1 1.25
xG Accuracy: 64%

The model missed the final outcome (Reddis win 0–1).

The model had projected Utebo at 37.5%, but the full-time result went the other way.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Prediction grade F

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Under 2.5 (1 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 Utebo Reddis ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 0-1 ✔ Correct

Model vs Closing Market

Broadly Aligned

The model and closing market are broadly aligned.

Largest probability gap: Utebo -2.8 pp

Outcome Model Closing Market Difference Signal
Utebo 37.5% 40.4% -2.8 pp Aligned
Draw 29.6% 28.6% +1.0 pp Aligned
Reddis 32.9% 31.0% +1.9 pp Aligned

The model and closing market are broadly aligned, with probability differences below 5 percentage points.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.

After full time, the result was Reddis win 0–1.

Market Assessment

The market and model are broadly aligned. Any small pricing gap likely reflects rounding or bookmaker margin, not a structural disagreement.

  • Current pricing remains close to the model baseline.

Post Match Insights

What worked

  • Exact score 0–1 fell within the model's highlighted bins

What failed

  • Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS Yes; match finished BTTS No
  • Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Over 2.5; match finished Under 2.5 (1 goals)

Market lesson

The full-time result was Reddis win 0–1, which did not match the model's pre-match lean on 1X2.

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Prediction Timeline

How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.

  1. Sep 27, 2026 · 15:59 UTC Forecast generated
    • Model 1X2 · Utebo 37.6% · Draw 29.6% · Reddis 32.9%
    • xG · Utebo 1.35 — Reddis 1.25
  2. Sep 27, 2026 · 15:30 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
    • 1X2 odds · Utebo 2.27 · Draw 3.20 · Reddis 2.96
    • Implied 1X2 · Utebo 40.4% · Draw 28.6% · Reddis 31.0%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  3. Sep 27, 2026 · 15:59 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
    • 1X2 odds · Utebo 2.27 · Draw 3.20 · Reddis 2.96
    • Implied 1X2 · Utebo 40.4% · Draw 28.6% · Reddis 31.0%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  4. Sep 27, 2026 · 16:00 UTC Kickoff
  5. FT Full-time result Reddis win · 0–1
  6. FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
  7. Archived Prediction review

Historical Snapshot

Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.

Historical verdict: Observe
Historical Decision No Primary Bet
Outcome Missed
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
Prediction Reliability 78/100 · High
  • Validation: Pass
Evidence ★★★★★
  • No strong statistical edge
  • Direction agrees with model lean
  • Validation passed
Market Compatibility 85/100
Betting Confidence 81/100

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Sep 21, 2026 · 00:57 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-10082208

Closing Odds 2.27
AI Fair Odds —
CLV Pending
Final Result Reddis win · Utebo 0–1 Reddis
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Review FAQ

How accurate was the prediction?
This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
What does xG Accuracy measure?
xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
Does this improve the AI record?
Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Pre-match snapshot for this fixture.

  • League: Segunda División RFEF - Group 2
  • Fixture: Utebo vs Reddis
  • Kickoff: 2026-09-27 16:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 37.6% · Draw 29.6% · Away 32.9%
  • xG (showing): Utebo 1.35 — Reddis 1.25 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Best +EV line (same label as hero card when Primary thresholds are not met): Over 2.5 goals
  • Model: 48.2% · Implied: 44.9% · Probability edge: +3.3 pts · Est. EV: +3.1%
  • BTTS (model): Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.5%)

Where EV is shown, it is estimated return per unit stake at the best tracked decimal price — not the same thing as a raw probability gap.

1X2 can look balanced even when side markets show clearer structure.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: No Primary Bet

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 28, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Utebo & Reddis!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Predictions
Segunda División RFEF - Group 2 Segunda División RFEF - Group 2 — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Barcelona B 4 3 1 0 10
2 Osasuna II 3 3 0 0 9
3 Ebro 4 2 1 1 7
4 Terrassa 4 2 1 1 7
5 Espanyol II 3 2 0 1 6
6 Manresa 4 2 0 2 6
7 Utebo 3 1 2 0 5
8 UD Logroñés II 4 1 2 1 5
9 Girona II 3 1 1 1 4
10 Olot 3 1 1 1 4
11 Barbastro 3 1 1 1 4
12 Tudelano 3 1 1 1 4
13 Peña Sport 4 1 1 2 4
14 Reddis 3 1 0 2 3
15 Calamocha 3 1 0 2 3
16 SD Logroñés 3 0 2 1 2
17 Arnedo 3 0 0 3 0
18 Náxara 3 0 0 3 0
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Barcelona B 4 10 0 +10 10
2 Espanyol II 3 8 3 +5 6
3 Girona II 3 8 7 +1 4
4 Manresa 4 7 4 +3 6
5 Osasuna II 3 6 1 +5 9
6 Ebro 4 5 3 +2 7
7 Olot 3 5 5 0 4
8 Utebo 3 4 3 +1 5
9 Barbastro 3 4 4 0 4
10 SD Logroñés 3 4 5 -1 2
11 UD Logroñés II 4 3 3 0 5
12 Tudelano 3 3 4 -1 4
13 Peña Sport 4 3 8 -5 4
14 Calamocha 3 3 8 -5 3
15 Terrassa 4 2 1 +1 7
16 Arnedo 3 2 9 -7 0
17 Reddis 3 1 3 -2 3
18 Náxara 3 1 8 -7 0