The model missed the final outcome (Girona II win 3–1).
The model had projected Tudelano at 37.1%, but the full-time result went the other way.
Tracked markets vs full-time result
Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.
- Market Prediction Result Outcome
- Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Over 2.5 (4 goals) ✔ Correct
- Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
- 1X2 Tudelano Girona II ✖ Incorrect
- Correct Score Insights 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 3-1 ✖ Incorrect
Model vs Closing Market
| Outcome | Model | Closing Market | Difference | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Girona II | 33.3% | 42.4% | -9.1 pp | Market Higher |
| Draw | 29.6% | 28.7% | +0.9 pp | Aligned |
| Tudelano | 37.1% | 28.9% | +8.2 pp | Model Higher |
The closing market estimates Girona II's win probability at 42.4%, compared with the model's estimate of 33.3%, a difference of 9.1 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
After full time, the result was Girona II win 3–1.
Market Assessment
The market and model broadly agree on Girona II. The remaining divergence may reflect differences in team-strength assumptions rather than a directional disagreement.
- Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.60) — 4 goals materialised
- Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
- Over 2.5 goals aligned with the xG profile
What failed
- 1X2: model leaned Tudelano; match finished Girona II
- Exact score: outside the model's top score bins
Market lesson
The closing market differed from the model on Tudelano by 9.1 percentage points (46.2% vs model 37.1%) — in this case the market view proved closer.
Prediction Timeline
How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.
-
Sep 13, 2026 · 15:59 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Girona II 33.4% · Draw 29.6% · Tudelano 37.0%
- xG · Girona II 1.26 — Tudelano 1.34
-
Sep 13, 2026 · 15:31 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Girona II 2.16 · Draw 3.19 · Tudelano 3.17
- Implied 1X2 · Girona II 42.4% · Draw 28.7% · Tudelano 28.9%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Sep 13, 2026 · 15:59 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Girona II 2.16 · Draw 3.19 · Tudelano 3.17
- Implied 1X2 · Girona II 42.4% · Draw 28.7% · Tudelano 28.9%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Sep 13, 2026 · 16:00 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Girona II win · 3–1
-
FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Historical Snapshot
Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
- Validation: Pass
- No strong statistical edge
- Direction agrees with model lean
- Validation passed
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Review FAQ
- How accurate was the prediction?
- This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
- What does xG Accuracy measure?
- xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
- Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
- Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
- Does this improve the AI record?
- Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore More Predictions Content
Get Premium Predictions for Girona II & Tudelano!
Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.
Subscribe Now
Segunda División RFEF - Group 2 — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Barcelona B | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 10 |
| 2 | Osasuna II | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9 |
| 3 | Ebro | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| 4 | Terrassa | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| 5 | Espanyol II | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| 6 | Manresa | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
| 7 | Utebo | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| 8 | UD Logroñés II | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| 9 | Girona II | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 10 | Olot | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 11 | Barbastro | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 12 | Tudelano | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 13 | Peña Sport | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| 14 | Reddis | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| 15 | Calamocha | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| 16 | SD Logroñés | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| 17 | Arnedo | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| 18 | Náxara | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Barcelona B | 4 | 10 | 0 | +10 | 10 |
| 2 | Espanyol II | 3 | 8 | 3 | +5 | 6 |
| 3 | Girona II | 3 | 8 | 7 | +1 | 4 |
| 4 | Manresa | 4 | 7 | 4 | +3 | 6 |
| 5 | Osasuna II | 3 | 6 | 1 | +5 | 9 |
| 6 | Ebro | 4 | 5 | 3 | +2 | 7 |
| 7 | Olot | 3 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 4 |
| 8 | Utebo | 3 | 4 | 3 | +1 | 5 |
| 9 | Barbastro | 3 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| 10 | SD Logroñés | 3 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 2 |
| 11 | UD Logroñés II | 4 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| 12 | Tudelano | 3 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 4 |
| 13 | Peña Sport | 4 | 3 | 8 | -5 | 4 |
| 14 | Calamocha | 3 | 3 | 8 | -5 | 3 |
| 15 | Terrassa | 4 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 7 |
| 16 | Arnedo | 3 | 2 | 9 | -7 | 0 |
| 17 | Reddis | 3 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 3 |
| 18 | Náxara | 3 | 1 | 8 | -7 | 0 |
